Why do boob jobs have to suck?

Author	Post
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 8:21AM I posted a comment in another thread that threatens to derail a discussion of an amazing sexy star. Essentially, some are fantastic. Why don't all the girls just go to the great surgeons? Bibi Jones Tasha Reigns [Link]
Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 9:07AM Very very very very very few boob jobs are fantastic. What's more to discuss really? Most go way too big and way too vulgar... leaving ugly scars.... But then again, America is all about bigger and "better". Half the population is fat and think it's perfectly fine. That said, boobies is not why I watch porn, I watch it because of those great asses and girls that understand sex on a psychological level. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 9:20AM The lady's tits need to look a little soft and suckable to me, or else her tits look no good to me. Because tits are made for sucking. This is their biological purpose. And defeating this purpose with plastic surgery simply doesn't make sense to me. It makes the lady look less attractive to me, when her tits look like hard rocks that no baby and no man can enjoy sucking upon. But I think boob jobs are getter better now. Kagney Linn Karter looks like she has had a boob-job done. And her tits still look a little soft and suckable to me. Like her tits I certainly do. Basically, the lady's tits need to look touchable and suckable, with some softness and some yield, when you touch her tits. Edited by - Dan on 12/11/2011 9:21:28 AM [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 11:12AM ^^ I agree that most boob jobs are "vulgar," the question is "Why is such vulgarity the norm?" For years, I assumed that surgeons just didn't have the skill and technique to do better, but Bibi and Tasha prove that isn't true. Is it just that girls push for two cup sizes when one cup size would do the trick, or that they try to save money when they should be thinking "investment," or what? Take jessica drake for instance. She's beautiful, classy, has a body that screams "I spend time in the gym," and is clearly invested in her career. Is this really the best she could do? [Link]
John Corollo Deactivated User 129 Posts 9/04	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 12:32PM ^ I agree on both levels. On the latter, it makes more sense to seek out pornstars whose boob jobs enhanced their bodies rather than made them look like a freak show and ask them who their surgeon is. You have to remember that most of these chicks are 18-24 years old so they tend to think impulsively and look for a surgeon who offers the best price rather than take the time to research their options. jessica, who's body I love, has gone up and down in implant size over the course of her career. I hope she leaves her breasts alone at this point because she takes such good care of her body and skin that further scarring on her breasts isn't worth taking the chance on, IMO. Edited by - john corollo on 12/11/2011 12:33:48 PM [mod edit: quote removed. please do not quote the post directly above your own. just use an "up arrow". thx.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 12/11/2011 12:36:48 PM [Link]

Rolf Muller Member 119 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 1:40PM I think that you have three sets of problems to good boob jobs, and for it to turn out well, all three have to be in place. 1) The raw material: the human body comes in a variety of different shapes. I'd guess that the average silicone breast is one of "one shape fits all" instead of coming in a ton of varieties like the natural human breast. Good breast jobs probably look good on those who's natural breast contours best match the general specification of their implant. 2) The skill of the surgeon: Not everybody who has the calling for medicine is also an artist - to render beauty on the human canvas, you'd need both. 3)Unconscious dreams, desires, and stereotypes: this could be in the doctor or the patient. Either one may have an idea of what a good looking breast may be, and either could push in a direction that any outside observer would agree was wrong, but they can't see it because they have a particular dream of how a beautiful breast would look and they won't stop until it's done. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:29PM This may be the future. In short, implanting a biodegradable matrix into which the woman's own breast tissue would grow. Over about 6 months the implant would dissolve. They are just starting tests on mastectomy patients, and according to the report, it wouldn't be available for cosmetic use for about ten years. (Assuming the tests go well.) Of course, I have no idea about what the breast would look like during the six months, or whether the implant would require a bigger incision than is currently used. But at first glance, it seems ideal. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:43PM CummingLinguist wrote: This may be the future. In short, implanting a biodegradable matrix into which the woman's own breast tissue would grow. Over about 6 months the implant would dissolve. They are just starting tests on mastectomy patients, and according to the report, it wouldn't be available for cosmetic use for about ten years. (Assuming the tests go well.) Of course, I have no idea about what the breast would look like during the six months, or whether the implant would require a bigger incision than is currently used. But at first glance, it seems ideal. Click to expand I've read about another breast-enhancement procedure, where a doctor aspirates some of the lady's own fat through liposuction and then injects this fat into her breasts to make them bigger. And apparently, this can permanently enlarge the woman's breasts, if after injection the lady wears a kind of negative air-pressure bra on her boobs. This device makes the lady's boobs balloon out because of the negative air pressure. Which allows the injected fat cells to grow, multiply, and heal, leaving the lady with permanently enlarged boobs. And the shape of the lady's boobs can be controlled too. Because it's the shape of the device sucking on her boobs that will determine how her boobs look at the end of the healing process. And on top of this, there are no scars at all. Because it works through injection and not cutting. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:48PM ^ I'd heard of using fat from liposuction before. Though I didn't know about the sucking bra. Do you know if it's widely done? If not, do you know if the problem is cost, that women want more enhancement than this can provide, that it just doesn't work that well, or some other issue? [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 3:00PM ^ I answered my own question. It seems that "fat augmentation" costs more than other procedures, and it can only provide a slight increase in size. Here's before and after from one doctor's website-- not what your typical porn star is looking for. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 3:02PM CummingLinguist wrote: ^ I'd heard of using fat from liposuction before. Though I didn't know about the sucking bra. Do you know if it's widely done? If not, do you know if the problem is cost, that women want more enhancement than this can provide, that it just doesn't work that well, or some other issue? Click to expand From what I've read, this is a very new procedure that probably not many plastic surgeons are yet familiar with. Actually, fat injections from liposuction were tried before. And they didn't work. Because the increased tightness in the woman's breast tissue, as a result of the fat injection, caused her body to digest the fat cells and make them go away. It's the negative air suction device for the woman's breasts that creates the room for her injected fat cells to grow, heal, and become a permanent part of her breast tissue, instead of the fat cells being rejected and digested. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 4:27PM Imagine sucking on tits leads to happy results! Who'd a guessed it? [Link]
Johnothan Pedak Senior Member Catastrophe 1594 Posts 6/07	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:11AM CummingLinguist wrote: Why don't all the girls just go to the great surgeons? Tasha Reigns Click to expand I'm pretty sure those are real. [Link]
Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:41AM You can see scars at the edge of her areolas (quite clear in the last shot). [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:53AM ^ I was relying on what seemed to be the consensus at Tasha's thread. Since then, I listened to the interview referred to in that thread. At around 3:09, she says, "I've always had boobs, yeah I mean, I've enhanced them [laughs], but I've always had boobs." I think this photo may be from before her enhancement. If so, then, yeah, she's always had boobs. If so, then part of the answer to my original question is that few porn stars have a God-given rack as nice as Tasha Reign (who worked at Rachel Lorraine when this photo was taken.) Edited by - Cumminglinguist on 12/12/2011 6:56:15 AM [Link]

RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 7:31AM Boob jobs suck. The end. [Link]
DP AsaAkira Senior Member 2087 Posts 8/10	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 3:22PM ^agree 99.8% [Link]
solidsnake Member Dying To Live 266 Posts 10/07	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 3:37PM For me, I am for anything that makes a woman happier. Come on, lets get down to brass tax. So most people are saying if you picked up Jessica Drake and you are taking her home to get it on, you are gonna complain about her boob job? I don't see that happaning with any red blooded male, or even if it is some big tit hottie you just met at a bar and are gonna do the same. I can see the angle of us all being porn fans and not liking the look of the one tit higher than the other, or "googly eyes" like I like to refer to them. But bigger is always better, but to each their own I guess. [Link]
Dread Senior Member Latex and boobs 5085 Posts 3/07	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 10:20PM despite what this forum thinks not every boobjob is the end of the fucking world. There are some great looking tits out there that are fakes. I'd rather not run them down though, the usual suspects will shoot it down as par the course. ----Dread---- [Link]
angryassdrummer Member 559 Posts 3/11	Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 11:05PM ^^^^^ agreed Jill Kelly still has the best tits ive ever seen and they are fake sure some suck, obviously they went to a cheaper surgeon. Here in australia a lot of women go to thailand as its cheaper to fly there, have a holiday, get the surgery and fly back than it costs to get the job done here. i have seen a few from both... some where amazing ( ex gfs were STUNNING) others were a bit shitty..all the great ones tho were a lot dearer..so im guessing same thing happens in the states.. Girls try and cut costs.. 1 doctor quotes $10 000 they go to another he quotes $5000.they think wow saving $5000 but then the end result isnt as good [Link]
monkey power Member Tim? 868 Posts 1/03	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 12:48AM this question has fascinated me for more years than I've been alive. What's with these people getting bad boob jobs in a career where their money is dependent on their boobs? Do lousy surgeons charge 30% less and starlets can't resist the savings or something? (It's like they went shopping and found a bargain and they don't think of the consequences until it's too late?) Or is it more like how insurance companies want you to take your car only to one of their approved garages for repairs? (So porners keep getting steered to the same bad boob job guys?) Is it that the industry is so jaded in its thinking that nobody even cares if the boob jobs are good or bad? (because studies show that porn fans are so dumb they'll buy ANY movie as long as it has big dome tits on the boxcover. And because stripclubs will hire feature dancers with ANY kind of boob job as long as they're big.) Is it that the majority of pornstars weren't A students and this means they're not very likely to do good research before seeking out a surgeon? (They might not have in mind what they want their breasts to look like, so when the surgeon asks them for input they have none to offer aside from saying "Just give me big honkin' bozumes!" ) (And if by chance you ARE one of these pornstars reading this right now and you're about to get your boobs done and you don't know what to request from the doctor, then please for the love of god make sure to try for boobs that have some "give" in them and aren't all super rigid like domes of cement. Make THAT the top priority! It's such a tragedy when people get these big silly tits and they still can't titty fuck worth a damn because the things are so rigid they can't be folded around the dick! What's the point of that?, I ask. That's like going out and getting a hunting dog and then the dog won't hunt.) Is it that starlets are pushing for too many CC's in order to get that pornstar look and many of their frames can't support all those CCs without looking weird? (Meaning the doctors often could have done better looking work, but the women insisted on clown boobs?) I mean what gives? Why is this boobie massacre stuff happening all the time in porn like a freakin epidemic? You know what I mean? [Link]
Harri Patel Senior Member #SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 1:12AM It isn't any of those things. It's simply the nature of the procedure self. Slicing a human body open, jamming a bag of goo into the wound, and sewing it back up results, 99% of the time, in an appearance of exactly what it is: a bag of goo trapped beneath the skin. It is what it is. It doesn't matter what doctor does it, or how much they charge. [Link]
Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:06AM ^ Except that there isn't 'a' procedure, there are a number of different procedures, and the results will vary depending on whether you go to a chop shop where the goal is to make a much money off the suckers as possible, or to a surgeon who practices reconstructive surgery and actually cares about the result. Granted, it is very difficult to recreate what Mother Nature provides, but the results can be acceptable; witness Vanessa Blue's job, or Mya Diamond's. Obviously, Ms. Diamond's is not natural, but it is still pleasing to the eye. [Link]
skronker Notable Legendary Icon Scopophiliac 9780 Posts 9/02	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:08AM Liza Del Sierra's boobs are fantastic .... and I think they are fake, are they not? [Link]
angryassdrummer Member 559 Posts 3/11	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:30AM ^^^^^ i could list 100 performers who i think have stunning fake breasts,,, but then the anti fake league would disagree with all of them [Link]

BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:52AM Liza's boobs are fake, but she's great enough that I can overlook it. [Link]
Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 3:04AM angryassdrummer wrote: the anti fake league Click to expand Sounds like super heroes to me. [Link]
angryassdrummer Member 559 Posts 3/11	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 3:18AM more like sooky villains i enjoy all boobs from perky little naturals to monster fake ones all boobs rock [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 6:14AM DreadSynapse wrote: despite what this forum thinks not every boobjob is the end of the fucking world. Click to expand Of course it isn't. But every new boob job makes it harder for me to find what I like and what I want. There are some great looking tits out there that are fakes. I'd rather not run them down though, the usual suspects will shoot it down as par the course. Click to expand As I've said before, I consider barely detectable boob jobs to actually be worse than obvious ones because it causes conflict in my mind and kills my boner. At 38 years old, I have enough obstacles to getting my rocks off without having my wood killed by a boob job. I need to be able to just relax and do my thing. I do my best to detect boob jobs before I'm sitting here trying to beat off. I need to be able to detect them at first sight. I'm actually pretty good at it. At this point, boob jobs are so ubiquitous I just assume every set of tits larger than a certain size has had something done to them and then I filter out the ones that are definitely boob jobs and take a closer look at the ones I'm not sure about. If they look at all suspicious, they have to go off of my list of girls I'm interested in. Finally, I arrive with maybe a small handful of current performers whose looks appeal to me who don't have boob jobs and crazy tattoos. Of those, several of them will probably make a small handful of movies and drop off the face of the earth. Of those who remain, they generally start getting tattoos about a month after I discover them and one day they just show up with a honkin' boob job. So I'm lucky if there are 3-4 girls I can really get interested in making a lot of movies for a wide variety of producers (because I'm really picky there too) at any given time. If you love boob jobs and/or tattoos and don't care that much about quality content or have any particularly special kinks, the porn world is wide open to you so I don't expect you to sympathize with me. You couldn't even begin to imagine how bad it sucks to go through a painstaking search for nice, natural looking girls and then to have even that highly focused effort fucked up when they show up with boob jobs and tattoos. It especially sucks when she's basically as perfect as women get (as was the case with Rebeca Linares). It's not the end of the world. It's just really disappointing and nothing really mitigates it. Once I know or suspect it's a boob job, I'm done. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 6:35AM angryassdrummer wrote: Jill Kelly still has the best tits ive ever seen and they are fake Click to expand I generally prefer the more natural looking boob jobs, like Bibi's and Tasha's that I referred to above. But Jill Kelly's are obviously fake, and I like 'em: [Link]
bissy Senior Member Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!! 7066 Posts 12/09	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 11:04AM Best boobs yes ...don't care if fake... [Link]
kripes Member 418 Posts 8/06	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 4:08PM Julia Ann and Jayden Jaymes got good jobs done. [Link]
draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09	Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 4:19PM angryassdrummer wrote: ^^^^^ agreed Jill Kelly still has the best tits ive ever seen and they are fake Click to expand I always thought they were natural and perfect until I saw the before pics, and was wondering why aren't a lot more that great. Told it was because of boob technology, that the old saline implant were more liquid so gave a more realistic breast but once they were found to be dangerous the tech was changed. [Link]
Sraddha Member 91 Posts 11/10	Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 8:02AM There are a ton of reasons why some elective surgeries don't turn out well. Some people just say the idea of implants makes a girl less attractive - of course, when they like a girl and profess they can't tell she's had surgery, that argument seems a bit weak. Like with BiBi - if you look back at her thread you'll find a discussion from last year where people were wondering if she was real/implants. Guys - she looks great, but the girl's 5'6'', has no body fat, and a perky D cup. Come on! It seems like a lot of this is due to exposure - if you grew up with Playboy in the 90's or later, the odds of people not minding implants are better. But there are usually three elements that are needed for a good outcome: 1. A good (only good - you don't need that one-in-a-million to get decent results) surgeon that understand aesthetics, 2. A good patient (a non-smoker in good health, with good bloodflow, recuperative powers, and - all things being equal - on the younger side of the spectrum) (and let's face it: after the same implants, a pretty girl will be prettier than an average one), 3. And some luck (not necessarily good luck - more like an absence of the bad kind) Why are there so many bad results, as evidenced by every strip club you've ever been to? Same reason an entire baseball team buy their cars from the same guy -- people generally use someone their friends/co-workers visited. Girls will often go to the same doc as their friends, and in stripper-world that often isn't someone that's been extensively cross-shopped. And it's a very competitive market -- if a girl can best accomodate 350cc but she really wants 480cc, many docs won't turn away the business - and that only increases the chances for long-term complications. And then the patients themselves! Often smokers (at best) with lifestyles not based on eating organic food and pilates. Surgeons doing what patients want and strippers for patients is a combo that will often lead to some bad luck, and some poor aesthetics. Anyway, this is meant to talk about BiBi's implants, and she's often given props to her surgeon, Dr. Malek in Scottsdale. I don't have any personal knowledge, but if my SO were in the market for implants, I'd recommend she at least interview him, based on BiBi's results. Edited by - sraddha on 12/15/2011 9:52:39 AM [Link]
bissy Senior Member Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!! 7066 Posts 12/09	Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 8:23AM ^ Now here is some in depth study on getting enhancements done....agree with all the points ...more with recuperative powers required and age on their side...better get it done when younger...I believe Bibi and Tara reign boob jobs are example worthy... [Link]

kripes Member 418 Posts 8/06	Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 9:44AM And they don't always look great, even from the same surgeon. See: http://www.marcmalekmd.com/phoenix-before-after-photos/47-breast-augmentation-with-lift [Link]
bissy Senior Member Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!! 7066 Posts 12/09	Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 10:37AM ^ thanks Kripes...but I found the after ones of #47 quite nicely done actually...IMHO....the before ones didn't have the spring in them... [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 3:28PM I thought the breast augmentations generally looked better than the breast augmentation with lifts. This may speak to one of Sraddha's points, because it seems like older women (or at least women with saggier breasts) are more likely to want a lift. [Link]
bissy Senior Member Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!! 7066 Posts 12/09	Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 8:48AM ^ the boob jobs are great looking...i believe in most of the cases posted above have been a success... [Link]
Sraddha Member 91 Posts 11/10	Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 9:40AM You really can't compare a BA+lift to a BA - they're completely different procedures. Patients will (often) have had kids, so their breasts will have gotten bigger, shrunk, didn't return to their original position, and now exhibit sagging -- so you already know that their tissue lacks the "youthful" resiliency for recovery. I thought the linked gallery showed pretty good results for both BA's and BA's+lifts. But yes, unless you're just tossing fatwa's against the entire procedure, there are definitely such things as good implants. They're generally not available in Mexico for $2500, though. EDIT: Oh, and those fat injection procedures that people keep talking about? Tough to see a future in which they're not as worthless as they are now. Edited by - sraddha on 12/15/2011 9:42:56 AM [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Dec 16 2011 : 6:04AM ^ Sraddha, you seem to know a lot more on this topic than I do. What is the prognosis for someone like Bibi Jones. She looks great today. What does the experience of nursing do for a woman that has implants? How is time likely to affect her implants? [Link]
Sraddha Member 91 Posts 11/10	Posted - Dec 18 2011 : 10:18AM Without personal knowledge it's only a guess, but I'd say future-BiBi will still be fine; her implants don't appear so large that her tissue can only support them for a brief time before it begins to break down. Time (i.e., gravity) is likely to have an effect, though it should be much smaller than you'd see with a girl with similarly-sized natural breasts. I think her implants are already 2 years old, so any obvious ill-effects like bottoming out would have already begun to show themselves. Nursing? Finances permitting, many girls have a redo after kids; probably most do after nursing. Mostly depends on skin/tissue elasticity, and if girls get 'boobie greed' -- after growing a cup size or two, many don't like going back down. [Link]
DP AsaAkira Senior Member 2087 Posts 8/10	Posted - Dec 20 2011 : 5:09PM 300,000 women worldwide have their breast filled with silicone from the company Poly Implant Prothese, PIP. According to newspaper Liberation the implants are causing breast cancer, the french authorities now recommends the women to have the implants removed. Another reason for women to stay away from FUCKING silicone and a reason for all the male implants freaks to stop encourage women getting the shit. [Link]
Dread Senior Member Latex and boobs 5085 Posts 3/07	Posted - Dec 20 2011 : 9:44PM some people are so damn narrowminded to push their agenda. Quite comical. ----Dread---- [Link]
DP AsaAkira Senior Member 2087 Posts 8/10	Posted - Dec 21 2011 : 6:47AM narrowminded?? JFC your right about comical, what a joke your are. [Link]
Dread Senior Member Latex and boobs 5085 Posts 3/07	Posted - Dec 21 2011 : 10:25AM no. Picking and choosing selective data to serve your argument is where the comedy comes in. Shall i link the story where your information was proven false? Again comical. but i really don't give a fuck about your or anyone else's opinion on this topic, especially when you don't understand the other side of the argument. So carry on. ----Dread---- [Link]
Sraddha Member 91 Posts 11/10	Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 7:53AM My take-away from the developing PIP scandal is that medical silicone shouldn't be replace with industrial silicone, and that the French version of the FDA really dropped the ball. Also, I'm glad that in the US there are laws and lawyers that can make the company pay; it appears that in France the company has simply disappeared and now the state may be on the hook. And I think you give 'implant freaks' way too much credit; I'd argue that most girls getting implants are doing it for themselves. And while I'm sure there are implant fetish people out there (their extreme opinions exactly mirrors yours, btw - have fun wrapping your mind around that) I'll be comfortable with my opinion: I've yet to turn a girl down because she didn't have implants, or date one because she did. People always try to conflate implants with penis enlargement, which doesn't quite ring true for me. I mean, I spend time in a gym, and I'm able to reach my physique goals; for many girls, reaching these goals is impossible without surgery. I always thought about girls getting implants as more like guys taking steroids: augmenting a physique beyond what is naturally possible. Depending on the people involved, the results can be great, or they can be laughable. But arguing about the simple existence of the technology is a waste of time and effort. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 11:03AM DP AsaAkira wrote: 300,000 women worldwide have their breast filled with silicone from the company Poly Implant Prothese, PIP. According to newspaper Liberation the implants are causing breast cancer, the french authorities now recommends the women to have the implants removed. Another reason for women to stay away from FUCKING silicone and a reason for all the male implants freaks to stop encourage women getting the shit. Click to expand I like your name, 'DP AsaAkira'. It makes you sound like a real fan of Asa Akira's sexy bum. 'DP Asa Akira!' is the kind of yelling from horny guys you would probably hear a lot, if they were a part of a live audience watching Asa Akira play dirty tricks with horny guys' dicks. Perhaps I should change my name to 'DP Kagney-Linn-Karter'. Although it's a cowgirl-DP and not just any DP that I want to see for Kagney Linn Karter. Because in cowgirl-DP, it's the anal guy on top who really gets to ride the nice lady's ass a lot. The lady's pussy guy is mostly there to make her ass tighter for her anal guy. Edited by - Dan on 12/22/2011 11:10:30 AM [Link]
DP AsaAkira Senior Member 2087 Posts 8/10	Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 4:38PM Hi Dan, thx, I choosed the name the day I saw Asa did her first DP, I was ecstatic that day, never thought she was going to do anal and DPs, I guess I was wrong BIG TIME, thankfully. Same thing about Kagney, but I just think her boobjob was not needed, but still a very beautiful and wild girl:) [Link]
dangol Deactivated User 134 Posts 1/07	Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 5:57PM I don't get into these types of threads much as I don't want to insult anyone by pointing out names. Jill Kelly, though far from a bad boob job, aren't anything that great. And I'm a big fan of hers. Some of the best boob jobs I've seen: Kagney Lynn Carter, Chasey Lain, Julia Ann, Pamela Anderson, Tory Lane, Dasha (Czeck porn star - Best tit job EVER!). Sadly, Nicole Aniston, one of the prettiest girls in porn, got a less than stellar boob job. [Link]
Hoya Deactivated User 338 Posts 2/12	Posted - Apr 8 2012 : 7:25AM Boob jobs mean the girl has no boobs. Not good. [Link]

Author

Post

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 8:21AM

I posted a comment in another thread that threatens to derail a discussion of an amazing sexy star.
Essentially, some are fantastic. Why don't all the girls just go to the great surgeons?
Bibi Jones

Tasha Reigns

[Link]

Gunzo
Senior Member

1377 Posts
2/05

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 9:07AM

Very very very very very few boob jobs are fantastic. What's more to discuss really?
Most go way too big and way too vulgar... leaving ugly scars....
But then again, America is all about bigger and "better". Half the population is fat and think it's perfectly fine.
That said, boobies is not why I watch porn, I watch it because of those great asses and girls that understand sex on a psychological level.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 9:20AM

The lady's tits need to look a little soft and suckable to me, or else her tits look no good to me.
Because tits are made for sucking. This is their biological purpose. And defeating this purpose with plastic surgery simply doesn't make sense to me. It makes the lady look less attractive to me, when her tits look like hard rocks that no baby and no man can enjoy sucking upon.
But I think boob jobs are getter better now. Kagney Linn Karter looks like she has had a boob-job done. And her tits still look a little soft and suckable to me. Like her tits I certainly do.
Basically, the lady's tits need to look touchable and suckable, with some softness and some yield, when you touch her tits.
Edited by - Dan on 12/11/2011 9:21:28 AM

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 11:12AM

^^
I agree that most boob jobs are "vulgar," the question is "Why is such vulgarity the norm?" For years, I assumed that surgeons just didn't have the skill and technique to do better, but Bibi and Tasha prove that isn't true.
Is it just that girls push for two cup sizes when one cup size would do the trick, or that they try to save money when they should be thinking "investment," or what?
Take jessica drake for instance. She's beautiful, classy, has a body that screams "I spend time in the gym," and is clearly invested in her career. Is this really the best she could do?

[Link]

John Corollo
Deactivated User

129 Posts
9/04

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 12:32PM

^ I agree on both levels. On the latter, it makes more sense to seek out pornstars whose boob jobs enhanced their bodies rather than made them look like a freak show and ask them who their surgeon is. You have to remember that most of these chicks are 18-24 years old so they tend to think impulsively and look for a surgeon who offers the best price rather than take the time to research their options.
jessica, who's body I love, has gone up and down in implant size over the course of her career. I hope she leaves her breasts alone at this point because she takes such good care of her body and skin that further scarring on her breasts isn't worth taking the chance on, IMO.
Edited by - john corollo on 12/11/2011 12:33:48 PM
[mod edit: quote removed. please do not quote the post directly above your own. just use an "up arrow". thx.]
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 12/11/2011 12:36:48 PM

[Link]

Rolf Muller
Member

119 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 1:40PM

I think that you have three sets of problems to good boob jobs, and for it to turn out well, all three have to be in place.
1) The raw material: the human body comes in a variety of different shapes. I'd guess that the average silicone breast is one of "one shape fits all" instead of coming in a ton of varieties like the natural human breast. Good breast jobs probably look good on those who's natural breast contours best match the general specification of their implant.
2) The skill of the surgeon: Not everybody who has the calling for medicine is also an artist - to render beauty on the human canvas, you'd need both.
3)Unconscious dreams, desires, and stereotypes: this could be in the doctor or the patient. Either one may have an idea of what a good looking breast may be, and either could push in a direction that any outside observer would agree was wrong, but they can't see it because they have a particular dream of how a beautiful breast would look and they won't stop until it's done.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:29PM

This may be the future.
In short, implanting a biodegradable matrix into which the woman's own breast tissue would grow. Over about 6 months the implant would dissolve. They are just starting tests on mastectomy patients, and according to the report, it wouldn't be available for cosmetic use for about ten years. (Assuming the tests go well.)
Of course, I have no idea about what the breast would look like during the six months, or whether the implant would require a bigger incision than is currently used. But at first glance, it seems ideal.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:43PM

I've read about another breast-enhancement procedure, where a doctor aspirates some of the lady's own fat through liposuction and then injects this fat into her breasts to make them bigger.
And apparently, this can permanently enlarge the woman's breasts, if after injection the lady wears a kind of negative air-pressure bra on her boobs.
This device makes the lady's boobs balloon out because of the negative air pressure. Which allows the injected fat cells to grow, multiply, and heal, leaving the lady with permanently enlarged boobs. And the shape of the lady's boobs can be controlled too. Because it's the shape of the device sucking on her boobs that will determine how her boobs look at the end of the healing process.
And on top of this, there are no scars at all. Because it works through injection and not cutting.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 2:48PM

^ I'd heard of using fat from liposuction before. Though I didn't know about the sucking bra.
Do you know if it's widely done? If not, do you know if the problem is cost, that women want more enhancement than this can provide, that it just doesn't work that well, or some other issue?

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 3:00PM

^ I answered my own question. It seems that "fat augmentation" costs more than other procedures, and it can only provide a slight increase in size.
Here's before and after from one doctor's website-- not what your typical porn star is looking for.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 3:02PM

From what I've read, this is a very new procedure that probably not many plastic surgeons are yet familiar with.
Actually, fat injections from liposuction were tried before. And they didn't work. Because the increased tightness in the woman's breast tissue, as a result of the fat injection, caused her body to digest the fat cells and make them go away.
It's the negative air suction device for the woman's breasts that creates the room for her injected fat cells to grow, heal, and become a permanent part of her breast tissue, instead of the fat cells being rejected and digested.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 11 2011 : 4:27PM

Imagine sucking on tits leads to happy results!
Who'd a guessed it?

[Link]

Johnothan Pedak
Senior Member

Catastrophe
1594 Posts
6/07

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:11AM

I'm pretty sure those are real.

[Link]

Gunzo
Senior Member

1377 Posts
2/05

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:41AM

You can see scars at the edge of her areolas (quite clear in the last shot).

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 6:53AM

^ I was relying on what seemed to be the consensus at Tasha's thread.
Since then, I listened to the interview referred to in that thread. At around 3:09, she says, "I've always had boobs, yeah I mean, I've enhanced them [laughs], but I've always had boobs."
I think this photo may be from before her enhancement. If so, then, yeah, she's always had boobs.

If so, then part of the answer to my original question is that few porn stars have a God-given rack as nice as Tasha Reign (who worked at Rachel Lorraine when this photo was taken.)
Edited by - Cumminglinguist on 12/12/2011 6:56:15 AM

[Link]

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 7:31AM

Boob jobs suck. The end.

[Link]

DP AsaAkira
Senior Member

2087 Posts
8/10

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 3:22PM

^agree 99.8%

[Link]

solidsnake
Member

Dying To Live
266 Posts
10/07

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 3:37PM

For me, I am for anything that makes a woman happier. Come on, lets get down to brass tax. So most people are saying if you picked up Jessica Drake and you are taking her home to get it on, you are gonna complain about her boob job? I don't see that happaning with any red blooded male, or even if it is some big tit hottie you just met at a bar and are gonna do the same. I can see the angle of us all being porn fans and not liking the look of the one tit higher than the other, or "googly eyes" like I like to refer to them. But bigger is always better, but to each their own I guess.

[Link]

Dread
Senior Member

Latex and boobs
5085 Posts
3/07

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 10:20PM

despite what this forum thinks not every boobjob is the end of the fucking world. There are some great looking tits out there that are fakes. I'd rather not run them down though, the usual suspects will shoot it down as par the course.
----Dread----

[Link]

angryassdrummer
Member

559 Posts
3/11

Posted - Dec 12 2011 : 11:05PM

^^^^^ agreed
Jill Kelly still has the best tits ive ever seen and they are fake
sure some suck, obviously they went to a cheaper surgeon. Here in australia a lot of women go to thailand as its cheaper to fly there, have a holiday, get the surgery and fly back than it costs to get the job done here.
i have seen a few from both... some where amazing ( ex gfs were STUNNING) others were a bit shitty..all the great ones tho were a lot dearer..so im guessing same thing happens in the states..
Girls try and cut costs.. 1 doctor quotes $10 000 they go to another he quotes $5000.they think wow saving $5000 but then the end result isnt as good

[Link]

monkey power
Member

Tim?
868 Posts
1/03

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 12:48AM

this question has fascinated me for more years than I've been alive.
What's with these people getting bad boob jobs in a career where their money is dependent on their boobs?
Do lousy surgeons charge 30% less and starlets can't resist the savings or something? (It's like they went shopping and found a bargain and they don't think of the consequences until it's too late?)
Or is it more like how insurance companies want you to take your car only to one of their approved garages for repairs? (So porners keep getting steered to the same bad boob job guys?)
Is it that the industry is so jaded in its thinking that nobody even cares if the boob jobs are good or bad? (because studies show that porn fans are so dumb they'll buy ANY movie as long as it has big dome tits on the boxcover. And because stripclubs will hire feature dancers with ANY kind of boob job as long as they're big.)
Is it that the majority of pornstars weren't A students and this means they're not very likely to do good research before seeking out a surgeon? (They might not have in mind what they want their breasts to look like, so when the surgeon asks them for input they have none to offer aside from saying "Just give me big honkin' bozumes!" ) (And if by chance you ARE one of these pornstars reading this right now and you're about to get your boobs done and you don't know what to request from the doctor, then please for the love of god make sure to try for boobs that have some "give" in them and aren't all super rigid like domes of cement. Make THAT the top priority! It's such a tragedy when people get these big silly tits and they still can't titty fuck worth a damn because the things are so rigid they can't be folded around the dick! What's the point of that?, I ask. That's like going out and getting a hunting dog and then the dog won't hunt.)
Is it that starlets are pushing for too many CC's in order to get that pornstar look and many of their frames can't support all those CCs without looking weird? (Meaning the doctors often could have done better looking work, but the women insisted on clown boobs?)
I mean what gives? Why is this boobie massacre stuff happening all the time in porn like a freakin epidemic? You know what I mean?

[Link]

Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 1:12AM

It isn't any of those things.
It's simply the nature of the procedure self. Slicing a human body open, jamming a bag of goo into the wound, and sewing it back up results, 99% of the time, in an appearance of exactly what it is: a bag of goo trapped beneath the skin. It is what it is. It doesn't matter what doctor does it, or how much they charge.

[Link]

Hardware

All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:06AM

^ Except that there isn't 'a' procedure, there are a number of different procedures, and the results will vary depending on whether you go to a chop shop where the goal is to make a much money off the suckers as possible, or to a surgeon who practices reconstructive surgery and actually cares about the result.
Granted, it is very difficult to recreate what Mother Nature provides, but the results can be acceptable; witness Vanessa Blue's job, or Mya Diamond's. Obviously, Ms. Diamond's is not natural, but it is still pleasing to the eye.

[Link]

skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:08AM

Liza Del Sierra's boobs are fantastic .... and I think they are fake, are they not?

[Link]

angryassdrummer
Member

559 Posts
3/11

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:30AM

^^^^^ i could list 100 performers who i think have stunning fake breasts,,, but then the anti fake league would disagree with all of them

[Link]

BlackSix

All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 2:52AM

Liza's boobs are fake, but she's great enough that I can overlook it.

[Link]

Gunzo
Senior Member

1377 Posts
2/05

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 3:04AM

Sounds like super heroes to me.

[Link]

angryassdrummer
Member

559 Posts
3/11

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 3:18AM

more like sooky villains
i enjoy all boobs from perky little naturals to monster fake ones
all boobs rock

[Link]

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 6:14AM

Of course it isn't. But every new boob job makes it harder for me to find what I like and what I want.

As I've said before, I consider barely detectable boob jobs to actually be worse than obvious ones because it causes conflict in my mind and kills my boner. At 38 years old, I have enough obstacles to getting my rocks off without having my wood killed by a boob job.
I need to be able to just relax and do my thing. I do my best to detect boob jobs before I'm sitting here trying to beat off. I need to be able to detect them at first sight. I'm actually pretty good at it. At this point, boob jobs are so ubiquitous I just assume every set of tits larger than a certain size has had something done to them and then I filter out the ones that are definitely boob jobs and take a closer look at the ones I'm not sure about. If they look at all suspicious, they have to go off of my list of girls I'm interested in.
Finally, I arrive with maybe a small handful of current performers whose looks appeal to me who don't have boob jobs and crazy tattoos. Of those, several of them will probably make a small handful of movies and drop off the face of the earth. Of those who remain, they generally start getting tattoos about a month after I discover them and one day they just show up with a honkin' boob job.
So I'm lucky if there are 3-4 girls I can really get interested in making a lot of movies for a wide variety of producers (because I'm really picky there too) at any given time.
If you love boob jobs and/or tattoos and don't care that much about quality content or have any particularly special kinks, the porn world is wide open to you so I don't expect you to sympathize with me. You couldn't even begin to imagine how bad it sucks to go through a painstaking search for nice, natural looking girls and then to have even that highly focused effort fucked up when they show up with boob jobs and tattoos. It especially sucks when she's basically as perfect as women get (as was the case with Rebeca Linares). It's not the end of the world. It's just really disappointing and nothing really mitigates it. Once I know or suspect it's a boob job, I'm done.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 6:35AM

I generally prefer the more natural looking boob jobs, like Bibi's and Tasha's that I referred to above. But Jill Kelly's are obviously fake, and I like 'em:

[Link]

bissy
Senior Member

Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!!
7066 Posts
12/09

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 11:04AM

Best boobs yes ...don't care if fake...

[Link]

kripes
Member

418 Posts
8/06

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 4:08PM

Julia Ann and Jayden Jaymes got good jobs done.

[Link]

draghixafan
Senior Member

Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush!
2378 Posts
7/09

Posted - Dec 13 2011 : 4:19PM

I always thought they were natural and perfect until I saw the before pics, and was wondering why aren't a lot more that great. Told it was because of boob technology, that the old saline implant were more liquid so gave a more realistic breast but once they were found to be dangerous the tech was changed.

[Link]

Sraddha
Member

91 Posts
11/10

Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 8:02AM

There are a ton of reasons why some elective surgeries don't turn out well. Some people just say the idea of implants makes a girl less attractive - of course, when they like a girl and profess they can't tell she's had surgery, that argument seems a bit weak. Like with BiBi - if you look back at her thread you'll find a discussion from last year where people were wondering if she was real/implants. Guys - she looks great, but the girl's 5'6'', has no body fat, and a perky D cup. Come on!
It seems like a lot of this is due to exposure - if you grew up with Playboy in the 90's or later, the odds of people not minding implants are better.
But there are usually three elements that are needed for a good outcome:
1. A good (only good - you don't need that one-in-a-million to get decent results) surgeon that understand aesthetics,
2. A good patient (a non-smoker in good health, with good bloodflow, recuperative powers, and - all things being equal - on the younger side of the spectrum) (and let's face it: after the same implants, a pretty girl will be prettier than an average one),
3. And some luck (not necessarily good luck - more like an absence of the bad kind)
Why are there so many bad results, as evidenced by every strip club you've ever been to? Same reason an entire baseball team buy their cars from the same guy -- people generally use someone their friends/co-workers visited. Girls will often go to the same doc as their friends, and in stripper-world that often isn't someone that's been extensively cross-shopped. And it's a very competitive market -- if a girl can best accomodate 350cc but she really wants 480cc, many docs won't turn away the business - and that only increases the chances for long-term complications.
And then the patients themselves! Often smokers (at best) with lifestyles not based on eating organic food and pilates. Surgeons doing what patients want and strippers for patients is a combo that will often lead to some bad luck, and some poor aesthetics.
Anyway, this is meant to talk about BiBi's implants, and she's often given props to her surgeon, Dr. Malek in Scottsdale. I don't have any personal knowledge, but if my SO were in the market for implants, I'd recommend she at least interview him, based on BiBi's results.

Edited by - sraddha on 12/15/2011 9:52:39 AM

[Link]

bissy
Senior Member

Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!!
7066 Posts
12/09

Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 8:23AM

^ Now here is some in depth study on getting enhancements done....agree with all the points ...more with recuperative powers required and age on their side...better get it done when younger...I believe Bibi and Tara reign boob jobs are example worthy...

[Link]

kripes
Member

418 Posts
8/06

Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 9:44AM

And they don't always look great, even from the same surgeon. See: http://www.marcmalekmd.com/phoenix-before-after-photos/47-breast-augmentation-with-lift

[Link]

bissy
Senior Member

Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!!
7066 Posts
12/09

Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 10:37AM

^ thanks Kripes...but I found the after ones of #47 quite nicely done actually...IMHO....the before ones didn't have the spring in them...

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 14 2011 : 3:28PM

I thought the breast augmentations generally looked better than the breast augmentation with lifts.
This may speak to one of Sraddha's points, because it seems like older women (or at least women with saggier breasts) are more likely to want a lift.

[Link]

bissy
Senior Member

Nikki Sexx is superhot !!!!
7066 Posts
12/09

Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 8:48AM

^ the boob jobs are great looking...i believe in most of the cases posted above have been a success...

[Link]

Sraddha
Member

91 Posts
11/10

Posted - Dec 15 2011 : 9:40AM

You really can't compare a BA+lift to a BA - they're completely different procedures. Patients will (often) have had kids, so their breasts will have gotten bigger, shrunk, didn't return to their original position, and now exhibit sagging -- so you already know that their tissue lacks the "youthful" resiliency for recovery. I thought the linked gallery showed pretty good results for both BA's and BA's+lifts.
But yes, unless you're just tossing fatwa's against the entire procedure, there are definitely such things as good implants. They're generally not available in Mexico for $2500, though.
EDIT:
Oh, and those fat injection procedures that people keep talking about? Tough to see a future in which they're not as worthless as they are now.
Edited by - sraddha on 12/15/2011 9:42:56 AM

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Dec 16 2011 : 6:04AM

^
Sraddha, you seem to know a lot more on this topic than I do.
What is the prognosis for someone like Bibi Jones. She looks great today. What does the experience of nursing do for a woman that has implants? How is time likely to affect her implants?

[Link]

Sraddha
Member

91 Posts
11/10

Posted - Dec 18 2011 : 10:18AM

Without personal knowledge it's only a guess, but I'd say future-BiBi will still be fine; her implants don't appear so large that her tissue can only support them for a brief time before it begins to break down. Time (i.e., gravity) is likely to have an effect, though it should be much smaller than you'd see with a girl with similarly-sized natural breasts. I think her implants are already 2 years old, so any obvious ill-effects like bottoming out would have already begun to show themselves.
Nursing? Finances permitting, many girls have a redo after kids; probably most do after nursing. Mostly depends on skin/tissue elasticity, and if girls get 'boobie greed' -- after growing a cup size or two, many don't like going back down.

[Link]

DP AsaAkira
Senior Member

2087 Posts
8/10

Posted - Dec 20 2011 : 5:09PM

300,000 women worldwide have their breast filled with silicone from the company Poly Implant Prothese, PIP. According to newspaper Liberation the implants are causing breast cancer, the french authorities now recommends the women to have the implants removed. Another reason for women to stay away from FUCKING silicone and a reason for all the male implants freaks to stop encourage women getting the shit.

[Link]

Dread
Senior Member

Latex and boobs
5085 Posts
3/07

Posted - Dec 20 2011 : 9:44PM

some people are so damn narrowminded to push their agenda. Quite comical.
----Dread----

[Link]

DP AsaAkira
Senior Member

2087 Posts
8/10

Posted - Dec 21 2011 : 6:47AM

narrowminded?? JFC your right about comical, what a joke your are.

[Link]

Dread
Senior Member

Latex and boobs
5085 Posts
3/07

Posted - Dec 21 2011 : 10:25AM

no. Picking and choosing selective data to serve your argument is where the comedy comes in. Shall i link the story where your information was proven false?
Again comical. but i really don't give a fuck about your or anyone else's opinion on this topic, especially when you don't understand the other side of the argument. So carry on.
----Dread----

[Link]

Sraddha
Member

91 Posts
11/10

Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 7:53AM

My take-away from the developing PIP scandal is that medical silicone shouldn't be replace with industrial silicone, and that the French version of the FDA really dropped the ball. Also, I'm glad that in the US there are laws and lawyers that can make the company pay; it appears that in France the company has simply disappeared and now the state may be on the hook.
And I think you give 'implant freaks' way too much credit; I'd argue that most girls getting implants are doing it for themselves.
And while I'm sure there are implant fetish people out there (their extreme opinions exactly mirrors yours, btw - have fun wrapping your mind around that) I'll be comfortable with my opinion: I've yet to turn a girl down because she didn't have implants, or date one because she did.
People always try to conflate implants with penis enlargement, which doesn't quite ring true for me. I mean, I spend time in a gym, and I'm able to reach my physique goals; for many girls, reaching these goals is impossible without surgery. I always thought about girls getting implants as more like guys taking steroids: augmenting a physique beyond what is naturally possible. Depending on the people involved, the results can be great, or they can be laughable. But arguing about the simple existence of the technology is a waste of time and effort.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 11:03AM

I like your name, 'DP AsaAkira'. It makes you sound like a real fan of Asa Akira's sexy bum.
'DP Asa Akira!' is the kind of yelling from horny guys you would probably hear a lot, if they were a part of a live audience watching Asa Akira play dirty tricks with horny guys' dicks.
Perhaps I should change my name to 'DP Kagney-Linn-Karter'. Although it's a cowgirl-DP and not just any DP that I want to see for Kagney Linn Karter. Because in cowgirl-DP, it's the anal guy on top who really gets to ride the nice lady's ass a lot. The lady's pussy guy is mostly there to make her ass tighter for her anal guy.

Edited by - Dan on 12/22/2011 11:10:30 AM

[Link]

DP AsaAkira
Senior Member

2087 Posts
8/10

Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 4:38PM

Hi Dan,
thx, I choosed the name the day I saw Asa did her first DP, I was ecstatic that day, never thought she was going to do anal and DPs, I guess I was wrong BIG TIME, thankfully. Same thing about Kagney, but I just think her boobjob was not needed, but still a very beautiful and wild girl:)

[Link]

dangol
Deactivated User

134 Posts
1/07

Posted - Dec 22 2011 : 5:57PM

I don't get into these types of threads much as I don't want to insult anyone by pointing out names. Jill Kelly, though far from a bad boob job, aren't anything that great. And I'm a big fan of hers.
Some of the best boob jobs I've seen:
Kagney Lynn Carter, Chasey Lain, Julia Ann, Pamela Anderson, Tory Lane, Dasha (Czeck porn star - Best tit job EVER!). Sadly, Nicole Aniston, one of the prettiest girls in porn, got a less than stellar boob job.

[Link]

Hoya
Deactivated User

338 Posts
2/12

Posted - Apr 8 2012 : 7:25AM

Boob jobs mean the girl has no boobs. Not good.

[Link]