Reviewers Recommend
Hot Wives 8, TheHot Wives 8, The - review by Captain Jack
Director: Mike Quasar
Starring: Van Wylde, Jay Smooth, Codey Steele, Ella Reese, Charlotte Sins, Freya Parker, Melissa Stratton. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 37 > Why do Female porn performers have short careers?
AuthorPost
Optimyst
Member

13 Posts
5/21
Posted - Apr 4 2024 : 1:49PM
I have wondered for a while as to why Female performers have such short careers as compared to Male ones. Even compared to other parts of entertainment it is extremely short.I Don't think it is any of these things(even though they would be the obvious examples.)

  • Abuse allegations: If it was abuse-related surely the same thing would happen in Hollywood with female actresses having much shorter careers than male ones as in porn. Obviously Abuse is NOT justified but it is a disparity between Hollywood cases of abuse and Porn that Porn performers are obviously more likely to quit as a result of it than Hollywood Actresses.

  • Physical and mental demands: Many other parts of Entertainment, Athletics and sport have MUCH higher physical(and I would argue even mental)demands than Porn so that cannot be it.

  • Money: Although the rise of Onlyfans has enabled longer careers relative to the 2010s, it still doesn't explain the HUGE gap between Male and Female career length and also between other forms of entertainment.


If it was these things then other fields that have them same issues would have the same short career span.
For example, athletes have a 15-20 year career typically, Hollywood Actors/Actresses can last for decades same as Musicians. Boxers and MMA Fighters have at least a 10 year career but female Porn performer's careers typically last a year or two which probably breeds the obsession some people have with anal. As in, if she is not going to be around for long better pester her for a poor anal scene then none at all.
So, Why do you think Porn has such a short average career span for Women relative to Men, as well as all other forms of entertainment?
Tessa
Member

337 Posts
7/22
Posted - Apr 5 2024 : 2:28PM
Could be because females in porn are treated like fads, today they're among the most sought after stars and then they often become old news fast. Like, in porn, new female talent is very much sought after. Males are treated more like an accessory, not the main draw usually in heterosexual porn. Thus, as long as they can stay hard and ejaculate, they can get work. In heterosexual porn, viewers don't typically watch to see the newest male talent or I doubt even pay attention to this. Yet with females, this is big news so when the newness wears off, it's different than with males.
Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11018 Posts
5/01
Posted - Apr 5 2024 : 3:59PM
If you look in any company thread here you see people losing their shit if a company repeats a female performer. There are only so many companies out there.
shalalin
Senior Member

1737 Posts
11/07
Posted - Apr 5 2024 : 5:16PM
Did you not realize that these people are the cream of the crop in their respective fields? For every single person you were thinking of when you wrote that, there are dozens if not hundreds who have a cup of coffee in the public eye at best, and then their professional career is over (or at least it only continues completely out of sight of the public, earning them no more than any random 9 to 5 job). Relative to the total amount of people who are actively trying to "make it" in each line of entertainment, I doubt women in the porn industry are all that special in the rate at which performers get to stay for the long haul.


Edit: And in addition to that, porn has very low barriers to entry. No 19-year-old that's suddenly getting the idea, "hey, I want to be a highly paid professional athlete!" is going to even get started with that, because the field is already full of guys/gals who've dedicated half their lives to it at that point (the vast majority of whom will end up failing anyway, per the preceding paragraph). Porn allows a lot more people to just drift in, which lowers the average levels of motivation and dedication among those who give it a try, leading to more fast dropouts.

Edited by - shalalin on 4/5/2024 5:28:47 PM

fit18
Member

642 Posts
1/20
Posted - Apr 5 2024 : 5:25PM
Men don't necessarily have longer careers in porn, you just have far fewer men so it skews the average. But if you were to compare only the women and men who go the distance, you may find women have shorter careers for the same reason they do in the corporate world, entertainment or sports: they want to have children. Sure there are outliers like Emma Hix, but most move on.

As someone who has been producing for a few years and known producers for nearly 20, the vast majority of girls leave after 1 or 2 shoots because they realize porn is not for them, and not because they had a bad first experience or got roped into girlsdoporn-type situation. Imagining yourself becoming a pornstar, and actually doing it, can be two very different things not unlike you wanting to skydive and then realize you don't like it after the first try. Some may love it, but many won't.

 
Tessa
Member

337 Posts
7/22
Posted - Apr 5 2024 : 9:18PM
"Many other parts of Entertainment, Athletics and sport have MUCH higher physical(and I would argue even mental)demands than Porn so that cannot be it." I disagree. Female porn performers have their offrices pounded repeatedly and this can take a physical toll. Plus, just watching anal scenes doesn't show the behind the scenes preparations where they may use enemas and not eat all day to prepare. They may get a call time in the morning and not get out until the evening. Sometimes, they spend time posing for many still photos before the scene starts and then get interrupted during the scene to pose for pictures while penetrated. This is physical labor and if the man has trouble staying hard or ejaculating, this increases the physical exertion for both the female and male talent because the woman keeps trying harder to get him off. This can also explain why men may last in the biz longer than women on average if that's the case. Because female performers and production companies often want established male talent who they know can perform. Some may be hesitant to work with new men for that reason.

Edited by - Tessa on 4/6/2024 10:08:13 AM

Helmuth Richler
Member

49 Posts
7/10
Posted - Apr 6 2024 : 3:19PM
I think if they don't have it in them to build a fanbase, it just tends to be over with quickly.

Women who wanted to aspire to a longer career, they often used to start with girl-girl. magazine layouts and spread shots, then ease themselves in with some vanilla boy-girl and then go from there to: Mulitple partner threesomes, orgies, DPs, blowbangs, the smart ones made good business decisions to get the maximum buck for their (fuck) time.

Maybe stars today still do the same, I don't really pay much attention anymore. About 10-12 years Cherie Deville did this pretty much to the letter as she debuted in LA porn - I guess she had already done an amateur Boy-Girl screw shoot under name "Lana" first but I didn't put two and two together - when she first started as an enthusiastic lesbo vag lapper and she worked her way up from those humble beginnings, by degree, to become a premier starlet / amabassador for the smut business.

In the post 2000s days of plotless gonzo most girls are kinda one scene (or only a few) and done, if they're not doing anal then all the sex acts variations on the theme of an intro interview and strip tease, BJ, oral for the girl, couple different positions to show off all the female body parts, (T, A & V shots) and then a pop. Often with little to make any of it special, it's just a dude setting up a camera and then point and shoot video style.

As has already been mentioned, there is always another set of young girls coming in soon who want to be cast so there is an endless supply to feed the demand.

Every day another girl turns 18 who needs the money, is a natural exhibitionist and loves the camera and is maybe attention starved or wants to show the world what she has in terms of her physical beauty or sexual skills.

Put that together with a strong libido, probably the sex hormones are never as strong as they will be when men and women are in their sexual prime of 18-25, the perceptioin of "easy" money (why work a boring job at Walmart for endless hours making minumum wage if you can have pleasurable sex for money) and also the internet's social media culture means lots of young people think nothing of posting and distributing provocative images, I think the never ending supply of girls if anything will get stronger.

My take on what's happened in the last few years anyway.

studrams
Deactivated User

409 Posts
7/16
Posted - Jun 7 2024 : 3:28PM
The last part of this sums it up very well, thinking you can do it and actually doing it are two very different things.
Being naked under the spotlights for the first time is undoubtedly a pretty intimidating experience for most girls and that's before they discover that sex with a professional is vastly different to sex with their boyfriend.
80s Mullet
Member

41 Posts
6/22
Posted - Jun 10 2024 : 10:18AM
It's a young women's game.

They go out and ruin themselves with bad plastic surgery and cover themselves in hideous tattoos, and then are no longer marketable except to certain niche audiences.

Tony Spumoni
Member

110 Posts
12/23
Posted - Jun 10 2024 : 10:36AM
What I'd be interested in knowing is how many women ultimately regret having made porn. It's hard to gauge this because once women leave the business, they do their best to fall off the face of the planet, you rarely see post-mortem interviews with women discussing their experience. I would bet when all the dust settles there's probably a pretty high percentage of girls who will ultimately tell you if they could turn back time, they probably wouldn't have done it, which contributes to relatively short careers. I'm sure people also get into porn thinking it's some small niche thing that only has a limited reach and they'll be able to have otherwise normal lives, and then the first time they get recognized out on the street run for the hills. Obviously everything you see on screen is (or should be) consensual, but just because you're consenting to something doesn't mean you're enjoying it or want to do it.
veridical
Member

176 Posts
3/24
Posted - Jun 10 2024 : 6:15PM
This sounds right. You see those interviews with new girls who claim to have entered porn because they 'love sex and want to get paid for it,' but porn shooting sex is wildly different, at least professionally produced porn is. Constant testing, long days, make up, weird scene locations, sometimes flying to a scene, learning dialog (though this is maybe less common now), putting up with a male talent you didn't have a *ton* of choice over (just a 'no' list), putting up with better or worse directors, doing stills in sex positions that seem unnatural or forced, sex with a ton of scene changes and getting a flow/chemistry can be difficult, then waiting for the male to pop after having been hard all day, and you get paid a contracted amount regardless of what the studio makes, and they own the footage and can release it ad infinitum, even after you leave the industry. Not every scene is this way, of course, but some combination of some of these features seems common. Like a 9-to-5 job for the rest of us, individual risk tends to be lessened but at the cost of bureaucracy and frustration.

Or, alternatively, you start an OnlyFans, choose your collaborating talent, shoot at your home or wherever you please, on your own schedule, and it takes little more than a little investment in a camera or two. You get to keep all the proceeds (or split with your collaborator). All the rest of the details are up to you. There's more risk, but there's more freedom and the possibility of greater reward.

But, ultimately, I think you're right about wanting to have kids, too. This is true for every industry, even for physicians. More women give up their careers in the interest of raising a family. And doing so after a porn career is just that much harder, so you see more women make decisions to leave far earlier than you might otherwise.

pat362
Senior Member

10083 Posts
3/10
Posted - Jun 10 2024 : 7:05PM
I don't get angry about porn so I can't speak for why some people lose their shit over mundane things like a performer appearing multiple times on a site but I do have a theory as to why some people like myself lose interest in that performers subsequent appearances and sadly it has very little to do with the performer herself and everything to do with modern porn. The vast majority of the porn made today is gonzo but worse it's copycat gonzo where you have the same performers doing the same thing with the same people in nearly identical locations. The things that differentiate one sites content from another is mostly cosmetic and therefore isn't as important as the actual content.

I know some will argue that an anal scene shot for Tushy will look different from one shot for Tushy Raw but are they really? I mean yeah the lighting is going to be different and they will offer some different camera angles but ultimately you will still get the same female performer appearing with the same male performer on both platforms basically doing the same things. Why would fans care all that much if that same performer appears 3-4 more times if we are going to get the same scene that we already have?

Tony Spumoni
Member

110 Posts
12/23
Posted - Jun 11 2024 : 11:19AM
There probably is something to this, while there are dozens and dozens of different stufios out there and sometimes the gimmicks or the setup might change, for the most part sex is sex, there's only so many different ways to shoot it, and there's only so much variety you're going to find. A performer who doesn't want to do anal or doesn't want to swallow typically won't change those preferences from one scene to the next, so if you see Perfomer X do a scene for BangBros, Naughty America, Brazzers, and TeamSkeet, more often than not, most of those scenes are all going to be interchangeable with one another. For a lot of performers they do they rounds at all the various studios, and after they're done I imagine they probably run into a wall where they either need to agree to start doing things they don't want to, or they stop finding work because would rather find new talent than continue churning out the same content over and over, why pay Performer X to shoot new content that will be largely identical to their previous content when you can just continue rehashing the over stuff forever.
Dr No
Senior Member

Blake Blossom,Crystal Chase,Leana Lovings,Ashlyn Peaks and Santana Ayo are all goddesses
1101 Posts
9/19
Posted - Jun 11 2024 : 4:37PM
I think some girls dip their toes in porn, without realising the repercussions of getting in the industry. Even if they try and do porn on the DL, there is still a risk of being recognised by someone they know. So the less scenes they do, the less chance of being recognised. The Internet is forever though. Once they've done a scene, there is no going back.

Whyspers2Scorpio
Senior Member

"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite
2347 Posts
12/17
Posted - Jun 13 2024 : 1:03AM
Nathan Bronson has been in porn long enough to the point where he has said that he can never been sure if his cock is going to work and there are days when he doesn't want to be having sex with a female performer. Let that sink in and then while you are digesting that: DVP, DAP, TAP, gangbangs, blowjobs done with very well endowed men - are you seriously going to say that MMA, NFL etc have far more physical/psychological demands? Maybe we should put you in the industry and see how long you last, I'm guessing less than two months. I think Damon Dice said it beautifully - adult performers are sexual athletes. I disagree with the argument that male performers inevitably have longer careers than women do because they are making WAY less money compared to their female counterparts, sorry to burst your bubble on that one. My personal explanations as to why you have shorter careers for women in porn is due to a number of factors. Within the US, being in porn restricts you from so many things and leads to a level of discrimination along with hostile treatment from a variety of places from banks to law enforcement to real estate to investments. One of the other factors is piracy and that is getting under the skin of a number of performers which ties back into what I said about the restrictions of being in the industry because it's extremely difficult to find a job that won't fire you once you are outed. Cherie DeVille is a wonderful exception to this being able to have a job in the medical field yet work in porn at the same time. Same thing with Phoenix Marie; I also feel like burnout is another reason why many end up leaving for private websites and OF. There have been more than a few performers who had endured a catastrophic loss that led them out of studio work from the death of a parent to a grandmother or a divorce or the loss of a child. It takes a special type of person to have a long successful career in porn and the number of performers who can develop/retain that edge or mindset keeps shrinking. Which is why not long ago, I suggested the idea of a porn bootcamp. Not to discourage people from wanting to enter the industry but much like in Special Forces, the idea being identify the weak links vs those with the potential and the drive to become future heavyweights; cultivating the career trajectories of the latter rather than the former so they keep rising to the coveted legend/icon status.
 
veridical
Member

176 Posts
3/24
Posted - Jun 13 2024 : 4:27AM
Yes. While I do think you're largely spot on about many of the demands of pornstars, there's a demonstrable difference between professional athletes, who spent most of their lives physically and mentally training to make it to the professional level, and pornstars, where most women can literally walk on to a set as a virgin and fuck for some amount of money, lol. No experience required. No training, nothing. Just show up, take off your pants, and get fucked. Guys, obviously, are going to be different. It's difficult for men to get into the industry, and harder to maintain a position in the industry given the demands. But, my point still stands: for the most part, what it takes to enter porn is nowhere near what it takes to become a professional athlete.

Further, there's a demonstrable difference between, say, spending 1-3 10 hour days on set per week having interrupted sex, popping Viagra or whatever to stay hard (for the men), doing stills and whatever else, in front of 3-5 people (typically), and the demands of a professional baseball player playing in 28 games in 30 days in front of 30,000 live fans plus 1,500,000 people on average watching on TV. Professional athletes are training constantly, on game days, off days, off-season, spending hours in the gym and studying video, maintaining specific nutritional plans, going to trainers and therapists of all sorts to maintain their health, plus all sorts of other commitments like team travel, charity events, media interviews, and all sorts of other things.

Not even your most famous pornstars come even close to any of this kind of commitment, or have to do so much to maintain such a high level of performance. That isn't to say that pornstars don't have skills, or don't have to maintain their bodies by going to the gym or eating well (though that's arguable, depending on the kinds of videos a performer typically shoots; think Nicole Aniston vs Skylar Vox, no offense to Skylar), but there are very few professional athletes who are able to let their bodies go without seeing such a drop in their performance that they can no longer perform at the highest level. For the most part, a gym rat pornstar can let herself go and simply do BBW or MILF porn and still get away with it, at least for some time.

That said, I actually don't disagree with you that there very important psychological demands on pornstars. I just think they're demonstrably different and unique to each. Whereas the MLB player has to put up with the psychological demands of playing in front of 30,000 live fans and 1,500,000 TV watchers, the pornstar does feel the pressure of being able to perform on set, pop at the right time, position, and per the demands of the director, and also, importantly, provide a cumshot that's acceptable (right color, amount, etc), which you won't exactly know until you do it.

Pornstars, both during and after their careers, also have unique psychological demands. In most places, it's never acceptable to have done porn. As you said, it disqualifies you from a lot of jobs, or at least it far more difficult to get those jobs after a porn career. It's still societally improper, and it will be difficult getting a job, raising a family (and your kids will one day know about your career and their friends might happen upon your videos and share them, dealing with current family who knows about the career and probably disagrees with it (in many cases, at least), finding and having friends who accept your career, and even just finding a supportive significant other who won't judge you for your current or past porn career. There's also, of course, the risk of STIs and pregnancy, and everything that comes along with having sex with many different people who are also having a lot of sex with a lot of different people. And, for a pornstar, maintaining a healthy personal sex life can be difficult, given their chosen career and the acts. They also sometimes have to deal with stalkers and people trying to take advantage of them, but, then again, so do some professional athletes.

Professional athletes don't deal with the same kind of societal disapproval, but instead are largely honored for their accomplishments. But they have a whole host of other psychological demands. It sounds privileged to say -- and it is -- but dealing with large amounts of money (at least in the case of top male professional athletes) isn't as easy as people think. Given the short careers of professional athletes due to performance decreases, injuries, new and fresher players, and changing priorities in their lives, they make a lot of money in a very short amount of time. For many, maintaining the quality of life they enjoyed while still making the big bucks puts financial strain on them, which is why 35% of NFLers go bankrupt or are financially stressed within two years of retiring. Their lives during their careers, though, aren't exactly perfect. Again, they're constantly undergoing physical demands very few people can withstand, traveling away from their families for many days of the season and with few actual days off, dealing with major injuries that will plague them for the rest of their lives (including traumatic brain injuries for many contact sport athletes), constantly under scrutiny from the media/journalists/analysts/fans/coaches, feeling the pressure of possibly being traded or sent down (in which case their living situation becomes tenuous), plus finding a significant other who isn't just a gold digger or who will try to extort you and ruin your career (see: Trevor Bauer), none of that is exactly easy, either.

My point here is that the demands of each are unique, and I don't see it as at all obvious that pornstars have demonstrably greater demands in most senses compared to professional athletes. Indeed, I'd argue that even the minor professional athletes, whose personal resources are probably more on par with many pornstars (though I'm sure some pornstars are making bank on OnlyFans, even doing softcore stuff or teasing -- see Bhad Bhabie/Danielle Bregoli's $52,000,000 made on OnlyFans, though this is atypical), still have potentially greater demands than many pornstars. They still have all of the physical demands as the other professional athletes, perhaps lesser fan pressures (since they play in front of fewer people), greater travel demands (same amount of travel, but less travel comfort), for far less money ($12,000 a year in A, $26,000 in AA, $63,000 in AAA) than their top level counterparts (interestingly, the average pornstar salary is estimated to be somewhere between an AA and AAA professional baseball player). So even trying to equalize in some way each career path, I still don't see it as obvious that pornstars somehow have greater demands. They're just different, some ways better, some ways far worse, but the considering the totality of each it would seem to me that the demands of the professional athlete are far greater, especially when taking into consideration the life-long preparation required to become a professional athlete, not just being able to respond to an ad, presumably getting an STI test, and showing up to an office or whatnot to have sex on a casting couch for $1,000 (their reported compensation for the shoot). This kind of preparation (and the resources it takes) alone demonstrates that the pressures experienced by these high level athletes is far greater and far more consistent.

I agree with the first sentence, but to the rest of it, I ask: who cares? Studios don't really invest in their performers. They're not professional sports clubs, who will spend millions of dollars scouting prospective athletes/draftees, investing in multiple developmental coaches who will work on different skills, developing professional athletes who will generate millions of dollars of revenue while contributing to the organization's success for multiple years. Most pornstars, at the end of the day, are nearly entirely replaceable. As much as we all might enjoy top performers like Ella Knox, Kimmy Granger, Kali Roses, Sky Bri, Johnny Sins, Manuel Ferrara, Isiah Maxwell, among others, if any one of them were to disappear, a studio simply moves on to another performer. In no sense whatsoever are any of these performers so important or talented that a studio couldn't simply replace them with someone else with similar looks, skills, or professionalism. In comparison, professional sports clubs have to develop their athletes, attract other players (which requires them to pick up and move), negotiate with other clubs for talent, coordinate the logistics of complex and high value contracts and visas, among other things.

A studio doesn't care about investing money into a performer to make them into a legend, when that performer can skip around to different studios and, now, create their own content and generate their own revenue. And I highly doubt you'd find any performer so new to the industry and yet so committed to a career in porn that they're willing to invest in themselves to pay for a "porn bootcamp." They're not exactly out there going, "Yeah, after I hit the gym I'm going to work on my gape for a couple hours." Once they learn the porn shoot angles, the rest is just how well they're able to consistently act interested in what's going on despite the frequent stops and whatnot. Whether a naïve new girl does one or two videos and disappears after making $1,000, or if she becomes a legend and makes a total of $300,000 a year doing a combination of studio and private work, studios don't have to care, because in either case, they're easily replaceable by someone else willing to do the job. She might look a bit different, or have different skills or things she's willing to do/not do, or moan in slightly different ways, but for the most part when a porn actress disappears, the industry forgets her and moves on (for better or worse, or right or wrong). Us fans are left wanting, but the studios just don't care. The investment just isn't necessary, and they have no reason to care about a performer whose investment wasn't necessary to begin with.

And, not to harp on this even further, but with the industry changing so much toward pornstar-led content creation, this will get even worse. Meaning, there will be performers who will come and go, ones who will collaborate with and support each other, and this will, in my opinion, make many of the studios even more of a vestigial organ than they are currently. Considering how quickly studio-led content is ripped and posted, and how easily a pornstar can produce quality content that's (imo) more attractive than cookie cutter, derivative studio-led content, and without having to placate shady studio owners, producers, directors, and so on and so forth, the industry is changing for the better. With the industry leaning more heavily toward pornstar-led content creation, pornstars can generate content faster, relatively cheaply, on their own terms, with performers they trust, keep a higher percentage of the revenue while maintaining rights over their content, re-use their own content to generate additional revenue, and, theoretically, maintain a career longer or end their career sooner with a greater amount of control over their content post-career, the only downsides are they have to market themselves, attract and grow their subscriber base, do their own legal/IP work, and obviously handle health concerns on their own. But the potential benefits of this model have to look very attractive in comparison to the tired, old model.

Anyway, this was far too long of a post, so I apologize. I'm just not convinced by your view given the above, and I actually think that the changing porn industry will actually improve their conditions, which will make the disparity between the unique demands of each even further apart, maintaining, imo, that the professional athlete has greater demands overall than the pornstar.

Edited by - veridical on 6/13/2024 4:30:22 AM

damaster
Member

74 Posts
9/20
Posted - Jun 13 2024 : 9:18AM
I see their careers similar to pro athletes. Some have short careers and shine for 1 or 2 years. Other performer have HOF-Careers or are simple workhorses. There is always new girls or women who move u to take the dicks.
Optimyst
Member

13 Posts
5/21
Posted - Jul 15 2024 : 6:54AM
[


How can you square a lack of competition with a very low barrier to entry? Surely that it a contradiction.
If there is a low barrier to entry you would expect lots of people to go into Porn which should also raise the requirements of people to do Porn in the same way.

dodgerfan
Senior Member

2419 Posts
1/14
Posted - Jul 15 2024 : 11:50PM
I totally agree with this as the most common and simple answer. Sure there are other issues that this thread has addressed and they are all factors but I think this is it in a nutshell.
studrams
Deactivated User

409 Posts
7/16
Posted - Jul 16 2024 : 12:52AM
There's no contradiction, there's not a lot of competition simply because there's not a lot of girls willing to do it and the only real barrier to getting into the industry is being attractive enough for studios to want to hire you.



Jump To: