WHY doesn't Brazzers have a site devoted to POV?!

You are not logged in
Log in | Register to Post

New Pornstar Interviews - [more]

Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 370 > WHY doesn't Brazzers have a site devoted to POV?!

Author	Post
Wolfe23 Member 54 Posts 7/09	Posted - Jun 17 2010 : 1:31AM I mean really, they have all these different sites, yet not one that is POV. It's my favorite type of porn and Brazzers gets all the hot girls for their scenes but I'm never interested in watching them because they're not POV. At least Naughty America has the Housewife 1 on 1 series, although I don't care for those scenes very much. [Link]
monkey power Member Tim? 868 Posts 1/03	Posted - Jun 17 2010 : 3:10AM because they've branded themselves as the ones who don't suffer from inferior camera work? And when they were creating their niche, it was easy for them to stand out as a quality product because everyone else was doing POVs which are incomplete scenes by comparison since the camera only shows half of what it could if it were moving around like in normal porn. Now with that said, if they're going to have 47 different sites they might as well do some POV on one of them. [Link]
Wolfe23 Member 54 Posts 7/09	Posted - Jun 17 2010 : 4:04PM monkey power wrote: because they've branded themselves as the ones who don't suffer from inferior camera work? And when they were creating their niche, it was easy for them to stand out as a quality product because everyone else was doing POVs which are incomplete scenes by comparison since the camera only shows half of what it could if it were moving around like in normal porn. Now with that said, if they're going to have 47 different sites they might as well do some POV on one of them. Click to expand I don't agree that POV means inferior camera work. If done right, I think it's the best genre of porn out there. Directors like Mike John, Chirs Streams, Jonni Darkko, Manuel Ferrara, Vince Vouyer all make very good POV movies. [Link]
ninja1 Senior Member 2939 Posts 1/08	Posted - Jun 17 2010 : 5:16PM Wolfe23 wrote: I don't agree that POV means inferior camera work. If done right, I think it's the best genre of porn out there. Directors like Mike John, Chirs Streams, Jonni Darkko, Manuel Ferrara, Vince Vouyer all make very good POV movies. Click to expand Even the best POV is inherently restricted, because it can't show many of the (imo) best camera angles and positions. No matter how great the director. It's more about the viewer being OK with the sacrifice or (more likely) not perceiving it as a sacrifice. Personally, I can't watch POV without getting frustrated and wishing the camera could be further away and showing a wider/different view of the girl. I can't just let go and flow with it, and believe me I've tried. But....to each his own. [Link]
rc7394 Senior Member 1109 Posts 8/04	Posted - Jun 17 2010 : 6:56PM Peter North's POV series is excellent as compared to Lex Steele's POV series. There are some good POV series out there but not many. Brazzers knows exactly how to shoot a scene. Naughty America's Housewife 1 On 1 is a really good POV series (Rachel Roxxx, Mya Luanna, etc.). Write Brazzers and ask them to add POV. Brazzers does much better work than Digital Playground who can't shoot porn to save their life. [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 370WHY doesn't Brazzers have a site devoted to POV?!

Previous topic: Big Wet Asses 17 Casting Suggestions
Next topic: Bangbros lost It's way?