I've been posting here for some time about the appeal of women who (enthusiastically) accept cock from ass to pussy. Fairly, I've been confronted by those who argue the dangers of various bacterial infections. But, I have remained amazed by beautiful women, like Angel Dark, who is tall, statuesque and exquisite, and who seem to revel in numerous scenes where she accepts cock from her ass to her pussy. Consensus would have Angel as the best of the best. And, she is sufficiently filthy to take cock from ass to pussy in everything she does. And, she swoons when the swap happens. We love her, and she deserves loving. She also deserves regular highlighting as the best of the best, and a very filthy woman (for which we all love her!!)
I forgot to add (which was the point in the first place) how so many shy away from porn events like ATP. I've read so many reviews that skip around the reality (e.g in recent times the O-Ring Blowout review. The simple reality was Keri took a number of ATP events. Read the review and no such thing happened.) To me it was great that Keri took cock ass to pussy. Just like it was great to see her as the cutest ATOGM cock cleaner in Anal Expedition. Keri is trusting and filthy. Now she is with Wicked. Who dares, wins. Personally, I'd like to see Keri take Mandingo and Lex, anally, at once. Too late, perhaps? But, she could do it.
I honestly think that you're one of the very few who cares enough about seeing ATP to make an issue of it.
Before you came along, it's not something I even thought to note in reviews. Now that you've started posting, I notice it and point it out as a negative (simply because I'd prefer not to see the girls taking that risk--not that it isn't their right to do so. Just my preference.). ::shrug::
Anyway, I guess I just don't understand the issue that you're raising.
I can certainly get behind your ode to Angel Dark, if you need some backup there, however. :) Although I like her for different reasons than her willingness to do ATP. :)
Hardware, It wasn't an ode to Angel. To bluntly put the point, the point was when ATP happens so many ignore it. Why? At ADT reviews include commentary on ATM, ATOGM etc, but ATP seems verboten (I repeat, Keri Sable in O Ring Blowout - she took cock ATP a number of times without protest). The reviews dodge the act. I just don't get it. The most prolific ATP proponent in modern gonzo hardcore is Erik Everhard. He is (rightly) welcomed here, but what he does is ignored. It does not make sense. Erik is a frequent ATP practitioner, but the act5 is ignored. By coy, I meant the subject is avoided by many, to me unreasonably. The list of ATP practitioners is not restricted to hack Europeans. Ashley Haze, Melissa Lauren, Chiquita Lopez, Trixie Lixx, Sabrine Maui, Lauren Phoenix, Miko Lee, Lyla Lei, Jayna Oso, Roxy Jezel, Audrey Hollander, Taylor Rain, Jasmine Lynn, Kelly Kroft, Lucy Thai, Sara Blue, Vanessa Mae, Sandra DeMarco, Jane Darling, Ellen Saint, Angel Dark, Lilliane Tiger, Julie Silver, Simmone Peach, Nikki Dark, Bianca Pureheart, Naudia Nice, Angelina Crow, Lucy Anne, Kathy Anderson, Claudia Rossi, Melissa Black, Sandra Romain, Dora Venter, Lucy Lee and Jessica Fiorentino are just some of the porn stars who have displayed more than comfort (watch Julie Silver in XXX Road Trip #4 - she's fucking amazing) when offered the switch of cock from ATP. But, yet, it's ignored in reviews and commentary. That's what I mean by coy.
Mlyons wrote: I honestly think that you're one of the very few who cares enough about seeing ATP to make an issue of it.
M, you're darn tootin' Porn is about excess. It's about risk taking. It's about real rule breaking. The issue I raise is the number of people who avoid the harshness of ATP, but feel comfortable writing/talking about ATM, ATOGM, gapes, etc. I don't see the difference when it comes to risk. I've always said I hope the folks involved have the risks mitigated by previous good behaviour and current medicinal practices. But, I still maintain, if it's good enough for people to write about Max Harcore's behaviour on this site, then it's good enough for a non-violentr li'l frog like me to wonder aloud about why good looking women seem more than comfortable with an act like ATP. I don't wish them ill, I just marvel at their willingness to partake, and wish them well. Crikey, if ever Audrey Hollander came to Australia, I'd be more than happy to buy the lady a drink and chat about weather, politics, religion and sport. She (for instance) just seems like a wierd, but charming, woman. And she's damn good at what she does, ATP and all.
Sorry, I gave up mind reading for Lent. Your posts will get dealt with as they are, not as how you dreamed they should be.
I suggest you consider PL's response. Maybe if you'd back off on the negativity and just ask if any reviewers make note of ATP you'd sound less like a broken record.
Ok... and who's saying it's not ok for you to do that?
By all means, talk about ATP all you want. Once again, I just don't get the issue you're raising--which seems to be bigger than it needs to be. Like Hardware said, if you want reviewers to mention it, just ask them. Some won't, some will. You seem to be railing against what you perceive as a double standard, when all I see is a simple issue of taste. ::shrug::
If Cobalt60 is right, in that I've just been spanked, then crikey, I must have missed it. See, I tend to believe folks when they say sites such as this are for posting whatever it is that floats one's boat. And that's what I have done. MLyons was close to the money, when he detected the concern about double standards. But, it's not a simple issue of taste - it's an issue of omission. If folks don't like it, say so (I concede some do, but very few, and infrequently cf the occurrences). If they do like it, say so. Just stop pretending it doesn't take place. If it's acceptable enough for some to post about (e.g.) pissing in a girl's mouth, or messy ATOGM, then this subject is no more extreme. If people put themselves up as reviewers of the industry, then they should acknowledge everything that takes place (that doesn't mean they have to dwell solely on it). Anything less is omission. And the most offensive double standard is reference to the risks of ATP, while omitting the risks associated with all other acts. Such rationalisation defies logic. The reason I mentioned Erik Everhard earlier is because he frequently indulges in the said act. If he does so without consideration of the girls involved, then that's not right. But, I don't think he does, given the responses. And, Erik seems to be a reasonable fella, given his longevity and standing in the industry.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Apr 8 2005 : 1:45PM
alongway, I think you're confused. Nobody here is putting themselves up as an "industry reviewer". This is a consumer review site. People review because they enjoy it and want to help others. It's not fun to review when people nitpick reviews and act like there's some conspiracy over nothing. You seem to think that not caring about a sex act equals shying away from it. There is no requirement to mention every sex act in a review.
[Link]
DenverDon Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02
Posted - Apr 8 2005 : 1:51PM
Wow. Quite a statement.
Have you written a review?? If not, try one. Perhaps you can give us an example where everything that takes place is included in it. Those could be some looooong reviews.
I still say that the omission is a matter of people not CARING about it... not any active attempt on their part to "pretend it doesn't take place."
You seem to be under the impression that every reveiw should make note of every single act that could conceivably be a fetish for every viewer. That, I suppose, is where we disagree. I can't think of a more boring review than one that would attempt to do that. Like I said, some will mention your fetish, and some won't. Find the ones that do, and even ask reviewers to make note of it. It's all good. But I really believe it's simply omission out of lack of interest... not out of some strange sense of health-conscious choice. As you say yourself, the fact that so many have no problems with A2M, peeing, etc. is proof of that.
Anyway, I'm just repeating myself now... I think I've made my point, and really... it seems silly to be dwelling on it like this anyway. :) I'll leave you to your thread.
I definately know what you are saying. I found that our natural bacteria gets fucked and imbalanced when it comes to using, foods, fem. products, lubes, and good old ass to mouth, pussy etc and not enough yogurt in the world can help that. BUt even doing these things you can still avoid getting infections by taking what is called pro-biotic blend vitamins from whole foods every day. It replaces your natural bacteria that fights the bad, that we kill everyday. It is a form of acidophilis and others, and it helps prevent having to take harsh antibiotics by giving your body enough good bacteria to do its job.I love doing other girls ass to mouth, it is a fetish of mine so these blends are great for me!:)
Tiana, maybe you should talk to the dairy company Danone about an endorsement deal.
Here in Europe they have some awful TV commercials for a pro-biotic yogurt called Actimel. (DanActive in the US)
Perhaps you could spice it up a bit:
Hi, I'm Tiana Lynn. Ask any Gonzo star today, and she's sure to tell you, shooting porn is hard work and can really put a drain on your body's resources. That's why I use Actimel every day to keep my stomach in top condition. When doing ATMs the immune system takes quite a kicking, but with AcTiMel, I can keep on licking.
I don't know if this adds anything to our conversation (my posts usually don't), but I would gladly accept the bacteria of Angel Dark's ass in my mouth; as long as it was coming from a strap-on manned by Simony or Simone Peach.