Chloe Temple Interview| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Something Different Member 96 Posts 1/06 | Recently I saw Russian Institute 8 and 3. They were both done by the same director Hereve but had one major difference. Volume 8 has taken a major step backwards in the development of porn. With so many studios planning to go to HD why does Herve have to put essentially vhs quality on a dvd? Is it for art? Last time I checked, when I go to a museum there were no signs that said please wear beer goggles to enjoy the true value of the pieces. Herve has taken a great film with hot women and softened, blurred and white washed it to a piece of shit. It should be a crime to destroy the film through so-called editing effects. Sure women at a bar might need some artistic editing to see their beauty, but not in this case where the women are naturally easy on the eyes. I guess I'm frustrated because I like the underlying film without the effects, as found in the earlier version. Perhaps he could make two versions for the market. One in the original version without effects applied and then one with the effects applied. -Mad as Hell [Link] |
| budtugley Senior Member One man's trash can be the next man's treasure. 1187 Posts 1/04 | Oh well, I don't have to rent it or buy it either. |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |