New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Hazel Heart Interview

"I LOVE the taste of myself actually. I love the smell and the taste and playing with myself afterwards! It’s fun."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 549 > Why the hell did they take that out???
AuthorPost
kh
Member

289 Posts
1/06
Posted - Oct 6 2006 : 8:48PM
What other videos have extra sex that SHOULD have been in the movie?

I was watching the extra sex/bts of Service Animals 18 last night, and there is a part where Teagan in stomach down on the couch getting fucked from behind.

The way her ass was jiggling......

Worth the money just for that short clip

DancesWithPorn
Member

Why say no, when it feels so good to say yes.
117 Posts
10/06
Posted - Oct 6 2006 : 9:04PM
Yeah that's ones of the best behind the scenes taken out I've seen. I have noticed Evil Angel has a bad habit of taking out scenes that are really hot. Oftentimes they take out scenes that are hotter than the actual stuff left in.

The one you are talking about is the above shot of Teagan. Her ass is jiggling like crazy and she's getting pounded pretty well and she's moaning heavily. The shot pulls her ass into frame and the rest of her body and she has pink elbow bands/pads on. Yeah, I remember that scene VERY well.

That's how porn should be made. Full body scenes, hold the position for a good while, lots of moaning or talk, some color on the girl via articles of clothing and no pulling out, just keep going at it. Yet they pulled that scene out. Why? Because they are fucking idiots that's why.

Well not always...

Edited by - danceswithporn on 10/6/2006 9:06:09 PM

DancesWithPorn
Member

Why say no, when it feels so good to say yes.
117 Posts
10/06
Posted - Oct 6 2006 : 9:19PM
The real question is who's to blame? The director or the editor? The director who can't see how hot it is to add more of that style into his film. Or the editor who thinks it should be taken out.

Just remember if there wasn't any space left, you'd probably never see it. Most DVDs don't even have out takes on them.

I think the main reason they did it was because of the fluidness of the film. Suddenly you got this really hot angle and style mixed in your crappy angles and style and it doesn't fit. It's too POV they think. The camera stays there too long when it's been bouncing all over the place prior. So they say, we can't have that! Let's take that out and make it an extra clip. And that's the problem.

I think a lot of porn gets dumped on the internet in 15 second clips, which is why when watching a porno it's like you are watching the stringing together of 15 second clips.

Whereas, most people stroking it to porn, really want the stringing together of 1 minute clips+. When I say a clip, I'm talking about the camera holding it without moving to something else. I'm talking about the pornstars holding it before changing it up too much.

So when they got there string of 15 second clips, or whatever pace they are at and you get something that's too extended, suddenly it gets pulled. That's my thoughts on it.




Jump To: