I think missionary position is the best when it comes to reflect the lust and enjoyment of sex to the audience. Man and the woman embrace themselves and their bodies contact at its fullest. I don't really understand why porn directors prevent missionary position in their films.
I see missionary positions in films all the time. Will admit I do tend to look for it though. I love it because you can clearly see the females face and eyes, the penetration itself, and her reactions to being fucked. Its also one of the few positions the camerapeople can't mess up as much.
Know what you are talking about. Full frontal body to body contact. So what you can't see the actual in-out. Seeing a woman on her back, with her legs in the air, or wrapped around the dudes back, staring him in the face, is HOT! Penny Flame has quite a few scenes like that. Well worth looking into.
Actual missionary position with full body contact is rare. What passes as missionary is bodies at a ninety degree angle is the porn norm. It's is a bow to the directors thinking that the the penis must be on full display at all times. Doggy position where the male kneels with both knees on a surface and holds the females hips with both hands as he thrust is a rarity.
[Link]
Karloff Deactivated User
319 Posts 7/10
Posted - Oct 18 2010 : 6:54PM
Mandatory condoms will hopefully eliminate mopes from the equation.
Missionary happened more often in old school porn, but not so much these days as you cannot see as much. Personally I think it can look hot (and sometimes I do not need the over-gratuitous highlights of penetration as it happens).
Simple answer. The way bodies fit together in missionary creates too many shadows where the penetration is taking place. It is an awful position to try and shoot. Porn sex is about performing for the viewers, not actual personal intimacy between the participants. If you want to see porn where there is more of an emphasis on the physical act of "love making", just do a search for "couples porn".