The good news is, if/when it is, the porn industry will be the ones to make it happen
[Link]
Natural 6 - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| warrenwest67 Member  Thanks for the mammaries. 966 Posts 1/07 |  Posted - Nov 12 2007 : 2:15PMNow that there is HD1080-p. Does the resolution make a difference? How cool would that be? edited to fix a misspelling in the subject line Edited by - heynow on Nov 13 2007 [Link] |
| Always Hardened Member 18 Posts 11/07 | Posted - Nov 12 2007 : 2:18PM The good news is, if/when it is, the porn industry will be the ones to make it happen [Link] |
| Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02 | Posted - Nov 12 2007 : 2:22PM [Link] |
Flash  Golden Age Classic 11017 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Nov 12 2007 : 10:21PM [Link] |
| Dracula Member Women's necks are too damned sexy for me! 756 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 2:24AM [Link] |
| Lonborg Member 114 Posts 1/03 | Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 2:42AM [Link] |
| warrenwest67 Member Thanks for the mammaries. 966 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 7:54AM [Link] |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 | Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 3:10PM The "neXt" thing after that is probably "brain" implants  Cube [Link] |
| coachcam Member 218 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Nov 13 2007 : 8:24PM Directed as always by Bobby Rinaldi. It comes with 2 pair of 3D glasses. Three discs...3D, regular and HD. The regular disc has BTS and Interviews too. [ invalid url ] coachcam [Link] |
| warrenwest67 Member Thanks for the mammaries. 966 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 9:38AM Thanks for the link... it looks great. How has it been doing. Ill have to look at some reviews. I cant wait to see what it looks like in 3-D [Link] |
| warrenwest67 Member Thanks for the mammaries. 966 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 9:39AM [Link] |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 2:23PM |
| Tinaka Member 953 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 2:30PM [Link] |
| bbillballs New Member 1 Posts 11/07 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 7:17PM If you want to check out some amazing Adult 3D CGI Animation,take a look at Pinks from Adult Source Media. I dig traditional 3D, but the animated 3D is pretty fucking awesome. Great box cover too. www.adultsourcemedia.com [Link] |
| coachcam Member 218 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Nov 14 2007 : 8:09PM Here are 2 links to reviews of Screw My Wife, Please 3D. CAVR Review [ invalid url ] coachcam [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Sep 2 2008 : 9:49PM I was with my little cousins the weekend before last, watching fishies swim in the deep blue sea at IMAX and all I kept thinking about was how fuckin' cool it would be to watch porn in 3-D. Could you even imagine interactive POV 3D porn? There would be men who NEVER left their houses. [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Sep 2 2008 : 9:54PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Sep 2 2008 : 11:05PM [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 1:57PM Also FEMALE POV? Dood...Now I get to see what all you guys go nuts over. [Link] |
| john lyons Senior Member Co-founder of Vinegar Syndrome 1188 Posts 1/08 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 2:06PM http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082193/ [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 3:17PM Sindee Jennings is such a cutie too...  [Link] |
| Cerebral Jedi Senior Member I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 11:23PM A milk enema being forced out. A chick "squirting". Some big ass titties swaying towards the camera. Those would be interesting to see in 3D. Though the enema one would be my least fav. [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 11:23PM [Link] |
| Cerebral Jedi Senior Member I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 11:34PM [Link] |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - Jan 16 2009 : 12:14AM The problem with the typical red/cyan 3D glasses is the obvious tint to the picture. Kinda defeats the purpose of having a nice, high resulution display, only to go and grossly discolor it. No disrespect to the producers of the products mentioned above, but I think those titles are kinda "gimmicky" and don't see those leading to a sustainable product line. (yes, there is interest in them now, but it appears to be more as a curiousity, than as good erotic material) The best implimentation I have seen was for computers, and required some special 3D glasses that interacted with the display. Basically the image was displayed in an interlaced format. Field A was for the left eye, Field B was for the right eye. The glasses were hooked to the monitor output and synced to the frame changes. When Field A was displayed, the glasses would momentarily block the right lense, and vice versa for Field B. While it did produce a bit of a flicker, the image reproduction was much better. (and in my opinion the 3D more striking) This system could be adopted for "normal" tv displays as well. The obvious downside to this is you would need special equipment... The glasses of course, and some sort of set top box that would trigger the glasses, either an add-on box, or a player with the functionality built in. (good luck getting manufacturers adding that functionality unless the big mainstream studios decide to persue it too) I've also read about technology that used glasses with polarized filters on them. The upside, was no color distortion or flicker, the downside was you had to have a very specialized display for the system to work. (Good luck getting everyone to ditch their current HD displays) Holgraphic projection is a possibility in the future, but I suspect their would be some significant problems with backwards compatability for current 2D displays. (and very difficult/expensive to produce) [Link] |
| licker Senior Member Heretic, Iconoclast, Skeptic 1141 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Jan 16 2009 : 12:43AM It would be tricky to do with video, you'd need separate video streams for the left and right projectors, and you would need to synchronize them to the exact frame. As you say, it will not work with existing HD screens. This looks interesting - Ad for new Philips 3D displays. Unfortunately you can't see any of the 3D effects in the ad, because you are looking at it on your 2D computer screen. I'd like to see a demo of one of these in real life. No glasses are needed. [Link] |
| UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Jan 16 2009 : 9:07AM Any red/cyan just makes everybody's eyes hurt and you lose all the color which is why 3D failed in the 50s and will continue failing until there are better affordable solutions out there. Just recently there have been some price drops in the area of 3D displays. For example, the iZ3D monitor which uses polarized light and polarized glasses, is now available at $399 which is quite cheap. It is originally tailored towards gamers but it will play any other TRUE stereoscopic 3D source. What this means is that releasing your DVD in red/cyan is a big no-no. What you want to do is release a DVD with both camera positions stored separately, so that any technology can produce the desired 3D effect by overlaying the 2 positions in whatever way is necessary for that particular technology. The other solutions are still quite expensive, especially if you look at the 3D TVs that don't require glasses. Have never seen those in action though but I hear they have quite the limited range of view which is understandable but applies to almost all 3D TVs including the polarized ones. The best overall solution is probably a higher-end HMD (Head-Mounted display). These provide the viewer with 2 tiny parallel OLED (organic LEDs) screens, one for each eye. However, the resolution for these will go no higher than 720p at the very very most. The cheaper ones are stuck at 480p. In either case the experience is still like sitting in a ginormous 3D cinema. And you don't get any eye strain because they both run with 60 Hz minimum with no flickering and true color, so that's why I'd say they're the best solutions right now. These are available at $1500+ (good ones). You might find more information at mtbs3d.com. Though that site also targets gamers it also concerns itself with all other areas of 3D technology and is one of the more active ones with actual reviews etc. Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 1/16/2009 9:18:31 AM [Link] |
| licker Senior Member Heretic, Iconoclast, Skeptic 1141 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Jan 16 2009 : 9:17AM [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Posted - Jan 16 2009 : 1:08PM One of the problems with 3-D is that generally doesn't give you a true 3-D feel, where you get a real sense of volume. What it really does best is separate the foreground from the middleground from the background. It's kind of like those shadow boxes where things are flat, but there's space between them. That works well for a variety of things, but porn? Not really. Another problem with it is that to do it properly, you really need to have the separation between the lenses matched to what you're focusing on. At reasonable distances (say 10 feet away) it's simple. But porn is usually stuff that's shot 6-feet, 4-feet away? Maybe a foot away for closeups. If you're shooting with a stereo camera (one that's meant to shoot two images simulatenously), the lenses are usually fixed and you can't change the separation or the convergance. If you shoot with two separate cameras, you can--but it's complicated and a lot of work. My guess is that at some point we'll have computer controlled cameras which can automatically converge and separate the lenses based on what we're focused on. But that's going to be very pricey and God knows how long it would be before it becomes cheap enough for most porn studios to justify the expense. CGI might also change things, since you could have a model and then tell the computer to render the image from two different viewpoints. I'm surprised that Pixar hasn't done this yet. Last problem is that a lot of people simply don't know what to do with 3-D anyway. It's wonderful, yet it ends up being gimmicky. A lot of good 50s movies were shot in 3-D (Hitchcock's Dial M for Murder, and I think John Wayne's Hondo, for instance), yet we only remember the crap like House of Wax and the shlock horror movies where they threw things at the screen. Same thing in porn. Not long ago I reviewed Rack-o-Rama, which is in 3-D, and it's a piece of shit. You're not seing a cock or a dildo pumping a pussy, you're seeing a girl skipping rope, or tangled in ropes that run into the foreground and threaten to tear your eyes out if you try to focus on them. [Link] |
| john lyons Senior Member Co-founder of Vinegar Syndrome 1188 Posts 1/08 | Posted - Jan 17 2009 : 12:05PM Anaglyphic 3-D is useless. [Link] |
| UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Jan 24 2009 : 8:06PM It uses wireless active 3D shutter glasses so you get - full color, any resolution - no viewing angle restrictions (as with polarization) - multiple viewers per screen They require a 120Hz monitor so you get 60Hz on every eye which is the same as regular monitors, no eye strain. They also work with Mitsubishi 60''+ DLP HDTV Theaters and, as I understand, you can also get them to work with any other TV that can put out more than 100Hz. 600$ for a 22 inch Samsung monitor with glasses, 200$ only glasses. Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 1/24/2009 8:12:50 PM [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Posted - Jan 24 2009 : 8:12PM [Link] |
| UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Jan 24 2009 : 8:16PM [Link] |
| MonicaF Member 136 Posts 10/08 | Posted - Jan 25 2009 : 10:28AM [Link] |
| john lyons Senior Member Co-founder of Vinegar Syndrome 1188 Posts 1/08 | Posted - Jan 25 2009 : 11:16AM It's a neat gimmick but it's headache inducing regardless. [Link] |
 | |
| Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 6:10PM [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 9:55PM [Link] |
| RFrog Member 396 Posts 10/07 | Posted - May 29 2009 : 12:18AM High definition 1080p porn? Yes. But I think porn's new home is on the internet. 3D porn????? Probably too expensive to produce. [Link] |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 | Posted - May 31 2009 : 11:49AM the possibilities are endless. I´ve seen some JAP 3D but they all had the same problem ... if you seen them you know just look at these PIC_1___PIC_2___PIC_3___PIC_4___PIC_5___PIC_6___PIC_7___PIC_8___PIC_9__ PIC_10___PIC_11___PIC_12___PIC_13___PIC_14___PIC_15___PIC_16___PIC_17___PIC_18__ pictures and tell me they are not fuckin hot  Cube Edited by - cubesnake on 5/31/2009 1:56:02 PM [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Posted - May 31 2009 : 1:46PM [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Posted - May 31 2009 : 2:50PM There was experimentation with print using a lenticular surface (i.e. ridges), but it didn't look very convincing. Then with glasses come all the normal problems. Some people don't like wearing them. Some of us already wear them, so you need something that fits over those, which is usually huge and uncomfortable. No matter what, it's a nuisance in some degree or another. I think the long term answer is holography, but that still has a way to go and hasn't been made practical on a scale where you can sell it at Best Buy for $199. [Link] |
| Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02 | Posted - May 31 2009 : 4:00PM [Link] |
| RFrog Member 396 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Jul 25 2009 : 6:42PM As long as it's video and audio, the fans tend to goggle it up. [Link] |
| UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Jul 25 2009 : 9:09PM [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Posted - Jul 25 2009 : 10:11PM I'm sure it'll catch on eventually, but it seems to be slow going. The leap between conventional DVD and Blu-Ray just isn't as compelling as going from VHS to DVD. [Link] |
| Flash Golden Age Classic 11017 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Jul 26 2009 : 1:32AM [Link] |
| spyblimp2 Deactivated User 3 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Jul 26 2009 : 1:49AM [Link] |
| JohnW Senior Member 1351 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Jul 26 2009 : 6:07AM I'm really looking forward to it. [Link] |
| Herzog Deactivated User 245 Posts 2/12 | Posted - Apr 9 2012 : 1:35PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |