Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 2/16/2006 1:47:40 AM
[Link]
Anal Slut Lilly Wants To Gape - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
LCF  All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 |  Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 1:47AMEdited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 2/16/2006 1:47:40 AM [Link] |
| gia jordan Member 670 Posts 9/04 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 2:20AM Reminds me of that Sesemee Street song Which one of these things is not like the other... . [Link] |
| The Fly Is Open Member Where in the hell is my grilled cheese? 575 Posts 3/05 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 2:45AM [Link] |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 10:19AM [Link] |
 | |
| Kat Kat Slater 72 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 4:51PM There are ways to do it that just may stay under radar of the extremists. I mean... they fuck too. Right? [Link] |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 5:12PM [Link] |
| eduardo911 Senior Member 1299 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 5:28PM [Link] |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 6:01PM [Link] |
| realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04 | Posted - Feb 16 2006 : 7:25PM monkey power wrote Why is it always the person on the offended side who is labeled as "touchy?" So if someone comes up to you and insults or disrespects a member of your family, will you be "touchy" for punching him in the face? It will be so nice when people, especially in the West, learn to start taking other peoples' and cultures' feelings into consideration instead of always saying, "Well why are they acting like that?" A major newspaper ridiculed their religion. That's why. Their reaction is definitely not right. Killing people and destroying property over a cartoon is unreasonable. However, I can definitely understand their anger, if not their retaliation. I don't think it's a matter of them being "touchy." Instead, I think it's a matter that people are not mindful or respectful of other peoples' faiths, beliefs, or cultures. This is especially a problem that many Americans and other Westerners have. They tend to say and do the most egregious things that are either ethnically, religiously, or culturally offensive. And then, when the offended parties react harshly, the perpetrators always want to play innocent and say, "What? What did we say?" Instead of taking any accountability, or even offering a sincere apology to make ammends, it's always the other person who is "overreacting," or who is "touchy."The insane psycho case Rob Black of Extreme Associates made quite a few movies like that. Supposedly, he has psychological issues from being raised Catholic, although I personally think his religion (or lack thereof) has little to do with. In "Ass Clowns #3," for example, Brian Surewood gets a BJ from a chick while he is hanging from a cross. I had to turn it off and couldn't even watch the movie. There's something about a movie making me feel like I'm going to Hell for watching it that immediately turns me off. Anybody who participated in the creation of that scene obviously has problems.[Link] |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | Posted - Feb 17 2006 : 2:24AM But my question was what kind of reaction will have western masses if were aware of a porn movie involving Jesus as a carachter? and what do the Jewish do if it was Abraham or Moses? what the whole population (well almost)of Utah may say if it was Joseph Smith?
[Link] |
| realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04 | Posted - Feb 17 2006 : 3:36AM Laurie Cameron Fan wrote They will do what sensible people do and just avoid or disregard the movie. Most people know what porn is all about anyway, so it wouldn't make sense to even get upset over something like that. If a mainstream movie or TV show does it, it will definitely spark a controversial reaction, but a porn movie would spark no such reaction, except perhaps among porn watchers. I doubt if a porn movie will be enough to incite a public riot. Getting upset over something a porn movie does is just as absurd as getting upset over an episode of "South Park." If I know that something is made for the express purposes of being offensive and inciting a reaction, then it loses all purpose as far as I'm concerned. It has to be something more meaningful to get a volatile reaction, at least in my opinion.[Link] |
| Sugar On Top Member People's Republic of Brooklyn 10 Posts 8/05 | Posted - Feb 19 2006 : 10:37PM First off, here in NYC most of the porn shops are run by Muslims. Fair amount of that in Europe as well. Don't let stereotypes go to your head. Keep in mind the USA (and semi-Christian European countries) are currently on a rampage invading and occupying various Muslim countries (Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Yemen, Pakistan and maybe soon Iran and Syria... It's u.g.l.y. Creating porn that feeds into the general dehumanization of war is really dangerous. Remember what happened to Saigon and Bangkok? Whole cities became brothels because of the madness of war. Nothing fun about that. There were reports of pornographization of female captives during the Balkan wars with inter-religious stuff reaching levels that were called "genocide." So kids, let's remember that there's a big world out there and people are pissed about more than cartoons. I have no problem mocking religion -- but we should stick to mocking our own and not other people's. That verges on hate. We have too much of that already... think Abu Ghraib and the giddy Americans having sex around Arab corpses. Really. I like porn, but I'd rather not just be a jerkoff. Edited by - Sugar On Top on 2/19/2006 10:41:21 PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |