Reviewers Recommend
Petite Hottie Has A Tight GripPetite Hottie Has A Tight Grip - review by Captain Jack
Director: KGB
Starring: Alex Jones, Cheerleader Kait. Read review
All Forums > Sex Talk > Sex Talk Forum Page 12 > Women's erect nipples are too small in porn!
AuthorPost
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 1 2014 : 2:48PM
I believe 99 % of women's erect by blood engorged nipples in the worldwide population are undersized and resemble fat men's or fat boy's breast. I've investigated and there isn't any adequate cosmetic surgery or procedure that has natural, erotically stimulating efficient results for women's nipple enlargement because, that capability is beyond current medical technology. Regularly for the last seven years I've enlarged women's nipples by photo retouch from subscription high resolution zip files internet porn as a hobby! Women at scale (actual, life ) size look feminine only with 13/16 inch diameter and length double extra-large nipples on a thin, small and medium skeletal frames. In beauty theory, women's nipple diameter could increase dependent upon if their breast size is over average bra cup size for proportionate ratio sake. I'm stating the opposite of most people's view on this subject, "that fat boy's or fat men's breast resemble women's breast" because, I think most women's nipples look too masculine when they're erect and still small! Below isn't photo retouched but, are perfect images of the 1 %ers of a woman's perfect erect nipples on breast! ALS_Model-10_Shalina-Devine_by_Als-Photographer_high_0015.jpg ALS_Model-10_Shalina-Devine_by_Als-Photographer_high_0024.jpg

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on Sep 2 2014

Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Sep 1 2014 : 6:09PM
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I must inform you, though, that your opinion is rubbish. Your opinion epitomizes everything that's wrong with the so-called "beauty industry" - it a woman's body parts don't fit some sort of preconfigured template, then she's somehow not good enough. Nonsense.
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 1 2014 : 8:42PM
@Mocko69,
Anthropometry (the mathematical measurement of women or humans) is necessary in determining the differences between ideal separate genders and people with intersex (pseudo-hermaphrodite) physical traits. Teratology is the study of abnormalities of physiological development and is also, necessary for identifying non-ideal physical traits. It is often thought of as the study of human congenital abnormalities, but it is much broader than that, taking in other non-birth developmental stages, including puberty; and other non-human life forms, including plants. A male bisexual as yourself that isn't authentically heterosexual, would definitely think my radical, logical opinion is rubbish!

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 1:39:16 AM

Pieps
Senior Member

Honey, come quick, somebody on the internet is wrong!
9233 Posts
11/13
Posted - Sep 1 2014 : 10:47PM
I think so too. But it's amusing, anyhow.
Possibly you were bottle-fed on a Playtex nurser with one of those squared-off nipples and you imprinted on that like a baby duck. Maybe that's even a widespread phenomenon.
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 1 2014 : 11:01PM
@Pieps, Ducks aren't mammals and can't produce milk to nurse their young (including having no nipples) and your imprinting analogy to a bottle's rubber nipple is also, incorrect! I've seen an extreme amount of porn of only naked women content sense puberty, is how I determined the preference of women's big, erect nipples. I believe male heterosexuals are supposed to have this preference through libido drive (instincts) but, the exact statistical percentages that do are unknown to me.

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 2:45:47 PM

 
Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 12:10AM
This thread topic doesn't belong in the Sex Talk forum.
Edited by - Macko69 on 9/2/2014 12:23:20 AM
Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 12:11AM
N/M
Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 12:19AM
More rubbish opinions, with a juvenile attempt at a personal insult.
Let me state that I said nothing about you as a person. I just called your opinion rubbish, which it is. It's not logical. It's stupid.
I'm not bisexual, and this thread isn't about me. It's about you spewing bullshit. Please, if that's what you want to do, don't let me stand in your way.
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 1:13AM
Mocko69 wrote:
"if a woman's body parts don't fit some sort of preconfigured template, then she's somehow not good enough. Nonsense."
@Mocko69,
A separate gender mathematical ideal is necessary, if a person wants psych or physical health as a goal.
I wasn't personally insulting you by accurately psych evaluating your bisexual orientation because, of your lowered, tolerant criteria of a sexual object choice's physical traits that resemble an intersex (pseudo-hermaphrodite)!
You're in denial because, you just wont comprehend polarity of gender nipple sizes!

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 2:48:58 PM

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 12:39PM
Ah, the lure of eugenics. Maybe you could have a sit down with Goebbels and Rüdin in Hell and discuss its merits with them. There's a reason eugenics is consigned to the trash bin of History. The truth, grasshopper, lies with Darwin, which means diversity is the key to success in Nature, and any attempt to standardize the human form is a step in the wrong direction.
Pieps
Senior Member

Honey, come quick, somebody on the internet is wrong!
9233 Posts
11/13
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 12:52PM
Photo_Retoucher said:
You're wrong. I did think it was in the wrong place, and I'm an expert on that.
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 2:31PM
Photo_Retoucher wrote:
A separate gender mathematical ideal is necessary, if a person wants psych or physical health as a goal.
Hardware wrote:
"Ah, the lure of eugenics. Maybe you could have a sit down with Goebbels and Rüdin in Hell and discuss its merits with them. There's a reason eugenics is consigned to the trash bin of History. The truth, grasshopper, lies with Darwin, which means diversity is the key to success in Nature, and any attempt to standardize the human form is a step in the wrong direction."
@ Hardware,
Diversity of what - hopeless, circus freaks? You haven't a clue!

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 3:40:13 PM

Pieps
Senior Member

Honey, come quick, somebody on the internet is wrong!
9233 Posts
11/13
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 3:28PM
Photo_Retoucher said:
Hilarious just as written.
Hardware said:
Photo_Retoucher replied:
Dude. If 99% of women have the wrong nipples... and diversity = circus freaks...
Hoo boy. Are the 99% of women who don't have pencil eraser nipples circus freaks?

Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 3:49PM
Photo_Retoucher said:
... 99 % of women's erect, by blood engorged nipples in the worldwide population are undersized...
Pieps wrote:
Hilarious just as written.
If 99% of women have the wrong nipples... and diversity = circus freaks...
Hoo boy. Are the 99% of women who don't have pencil eraser nipples circus freaks?
@Pieps,
I wrote explicitly to have no misinterpretations! The women's ideal erected nipples beauty theory is 13/16 inch diameter, about the size of a quarter and that's considerably larger diameter compared to a Number 2 pencil eraser. Yes, the 99% are negative mutations!
I've at least an ideal criteria that's involving the 1% high quality of women's breast with large, erect nipples.

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 7:04:03 PM

Pieps
Senior Member

Honey, come quick, somebody on the internet is wrong!
9233 Posts
11/13
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 6:02PM
Photo_Retoucher wrote:
I rest my case.
 
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 7:00PM
@Pieps,
I suspect you're female and was threatened of losing feminine empowerment for what I stated.
Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/2/2014 7:21:34 PM
charn
fubar

2880 Posts
12/09
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 10:52PM
Maybe ADT needs another subforum, such as Virgin Talk or Celibacy Talk.
Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 11:05PM
Photo_Retoucher's favorite sex toy:
[Image not found DB]
Pieps
Senior Member

Honey, come quick, somebody on the internet is wrong!
9233 Posts
11/13
Posted - Sep 2 2014 : 11:11PM
Photo_Retoucher said:
Yes, I'm female. I hardly think that my 'female empowerment' is affected by anything you've said.
You misread my mood. I chuckle whenever you post. I suspect you aren't for real. Or anyway, not any more real than silk was, or shameless. Are you putting us on?

Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 3 2014 : 6:26AM
@charn,
Permanent abstinence would be better than being a desperate loser, that takes what whatever garbage that's accessible!

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/3/2014 6:48:14 AM

Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 3 2014 : 6:34AM
Photo Retoucher said:
I suspect you're female and was threatened of losing feminine empowerment for what I stated.
Pieps wrote:
Yes, I'm female. I hardly think that my 'female empowerment' is affected by anything you've said.
You misread my mood. I chuckle whenever you post. I suspect you aren't for real. Or anyway, not any more real than silk was, or shameless. Are you putting us on?
@Pieps,
I'm very sincere!

Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/3/2014 6:36:44 AM

Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 3 2014 : 6:39AM
.
Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/3/2014 6:51:04 AM
Photo_Retoucher
Deactivated User

11 Posts
12/12
Posted - Sep 3 2014 : 6:49AM
.
Edited by - Photo_Retoucher on 9/3/2014 6:49:39 AM



Jump To: