The term "review" IMHO describes all kinds of critical statements about a product that judge its quality. Length and proportion between description and critical assessment can vary a lot. E.g. the movie reviews in my local newspaper, my TV guide and a feuilleton of a national weekly are all different in this regard.
So yeah, a review that offers a lengthy description of the scene content, i.e. which sex positions & sexual acts are done in chronological order, is totally standard among porn reviews.
As long as there still is a statement about the question "Good or Bad?" and "Why so?" I cannot see why this can't be deemed a review.
In this XCritic example, the judging parts are short, but nonetheless they exist, cf. "Overview"/"Final Thoughts".
Obviously one could write a review with a lot less description and a lot more opinion too...


