| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Endless Loop Senior Member Tomatometer 1129 Posts 8/04 | Why are there excerpts, highlighting scenes and cumshots, so often included in the lead-in segments, of the very titles they apparently aim to plug? I would expect that most have already purchased, or rented the movie, by the time its sitting in the player, playing? Not to overly criticize, since these are not the plot twists of suspense driven cliffhangers being jeopardized, its just that personally, I prefer watching never before seen content, lead up to equally unforeseen cumshots. Revealing the cumshot, just prior to its actual scene, risks nulifying any possible impact they might generate, particularly when the $shot, is significantly more intense, than the scene might otherwise have lead the viewer to expect. Seems I inevitably end up seeing these preview cumshots, before I can ever grab the remote, in time to fastfwd past them. [Link] |
| Joey Starr Senior Member Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00 | |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | For the most part, the title sequences you see are identical to the previews/cumming attractions trailers. So they're serving double-duty. I don't see any need for the studios to spend additional time and money creating a separate and unique "title" and "trailer" for every DVD/video. Exception: In big-budget plot-driven major releases (like "The Fashionistas") distinct titles and trailers should be the norm. |
| Zoid Senior Member Boobies and Anal 2004 Posts 5/04 | |
| PL Senior Member God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03 | Edited by - PL on 9/25/2004 11:27:38 PM |
| -Kelly- Senior Member 2517 Posts 5/03 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |