Hi just got a email back from A rep @ IAFD about my inquiring about the bio for a 90's actress called Heidi Kat.Rep said her bio had been deleted and they couln't comment any furher.Any one have any info on why she or others bio would be deleted and they can't say why Thanks
Without going into any more detail, the choice between an IAFD with Heidi Kat or no IAFD at all seems like a no-brainer. So we went with the no-brainer. Sorry to let you down.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. 1048 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 2 2008 : 5:39PM
This is quite intriguing. Let the speculation begin. I'll start. Heidi Kat is the daughter/wife/sister of a powerful politician or business mogul. Or possibly and underworld bigwig. This individual is doing everything he can both legally and illegally to erase all evidence of Heidi Kat's porn past. Unfortunately anyone posting in this thread is now a marked man.
Speculating and dragging this issue about serves to benefit NO ONE within the greater porn community! In fact, quite the contrary. I would consider it a great personal favor if everybody would just let this issue die a very quick death.
Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07
Posted - Jan 2 2008 : 6:59PM
Big Bob it's exactly that type of attitude that allows the cancer of censorship to exist and the rich and poweful to strangle those they choose. I don't want to see IAFD shut down anymore than you or anyone else but I would love to see the individual that threatened them brought to his knees and exposed for all to see. I find this type of thing more disgusting and obscene than any movie Heidi pussy could have ever have been in.
I don't think there are legal grounds for Heidi Kat to sue IAFD. This is a protected speech issue. As one poster has already mentioned, IMDB still has her filmography up.
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - Jan 2 2008 : 8:13PM
What do you know that we don't know?
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - Jan 2 2008 : 8:16PM
Is there a neutral place we can discuss this and get to the bottom of it?
Here's the non-info on AVNThat would be telling Seriously, Jeff made a decision that I -- and all the rest of the IAFD staff -- supported him on. We also support Jeff's reasons for not wishing to discuss this any further. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." - Benjamin Franklin
My guess is that she was either not of age when she started out, or that she used fake IDs. Her IMDB listing has her birth date as March 11th, 1971 and it also lists her as starring in "Return of Johnny Wadd" in 1986. As Mike South would say "Y'all do the math."
I doubt it's a underage thing.They still have the Traci Lords bio up.The Holmes movie @ IMDB say's "updated 1993" scenes.So it doesn't seem to be a age thing there either.I'm no 1st amendment expert,but isn't her bio public info now ?
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. 1048 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 3 2008 : 2:17AM
An interesting theory but since iafd lists all the credits for both Tracy Lords and Alexandria Quinn (and even state that they started at 16) I don't think that is it.
The quoted birthdate is the same as the one quoted on the original 'Official Pornstar Birthday List' (for those with very long memories) as well as Peter van Aarle's own data as provided via 'The Jamal Database' (also no longer around). When I last checked Heidi Kat's IAFD entry (in terms of it being available) her debut year was given as 1991, which would make her aged 20. All of the above sources have more credence in my book than does IMDB.
Just to help slow the speculation down... #1 Age had nothing to do with it. #2 The IAFD was not threatened, nor is it in any kind of trouble. Jeff is just a very smart guy who knows things that are not for public dissemination "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." - Benjamin Franklin
Drunkenness will get you ... well... put me in a shower with Rog and Skronk and who knows what it'll get you. ;-) To lay to rest a few quick things -- I don't talk about it because I gave people my word I wouldn't discuss details. I try to keep my word. There's no great mystery, it's all sorts of boring; but the people involved don't want details discussed, so I'll abide by that. And anyone can get sued; for anything; baseless accusations or not. And to defend oneself even against bullshit charges have costs; lawyers who file the "frivolous lawsuit" briefs cost money, as do the ones who argue "protected speech" and so forth. Not to mention just the mental stress created by lawsuits. Who needs it? The government knows this. Call me cynical, but I don't think they expect to win a single obscenity prosecution... they just expect to put the defendant out of business under the crushing weight of legal fees to defend oneself.
#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03
Posted - Jan 3 2008 : 3:18PM
Sounds like a threat to me. It's your website, and you can run it however you see fit. But you absolutely have the right to publish the bio for this individual (assuming it was more or lesslike all the other ones you have up), and anyone who advised you otherwise is full of shit. If it ever actually came down to requiring legal representation, I don't think you would have any trouble at all getting pro bono assistance, either from some of the attorneys who do a lot of adult-industry work, or just by putting out an appeal for help (opportunities to do actual First Amendment work are few and far between in the real world).
^ Harri, you're not going to catch Jeff and I in some contradiction here. Read what Jeff posted immediately before your post... Like I said, Jeff is a very smart guy. Bottom line: preventative actions were taken -- for excellent reasons -- so that nothing would result in harm to the IAFD. There is far too much invested in the IAFD -- blood, sweat, tears, Peter's legacy, tens of thousands of hours of work by our staff, Jeff's investment in time, equipment and endless maintenance and countless submissions by the greater porn community -- to throw it all away over one performer's listing. Like Ben said... "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." - Benjamin Franklin
Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07
Posted - Jan 3 2008 : 8:29PM
How come then the IMDB hasn't removed her list or entry. What in the world could possibly be that bad? Nothing shocks anyone anymore. Having said that I understand the desire not to be in court and having to pay for one's defense. I have always said that the state or fed should have to reimburse the defendant if found innocent. That would make them think twice about bringing bullshit charges against anyone.
Because the IMDB doesn't know what we know.I'm glad we agree on this :)We are not concerned with the government. As Luke said, "would you all let this go please." Thanks for the concern, but we've said all we can.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. 1048 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 4 2008 : 1:38AM
I was starting to be willing to let this drop but then BigBobxxx wrote the above reply. Too bad. I fear all you have done is to awake a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve. Dropping lines like that is only going to make people more curious.
Heidi Kat was on the grassy knoll. Heidi Kat is Mulders' kidnapped sister. Heidi Kats' real last name is Hoffa. Heidi Kat went for a drive with Ted Kennedy. Heidi Kat is a scientologist. For someone that's trying to keep a secret there sure seem to be alot of people here that know it. Kimi Lixx,Julie Night,Tina Tyler and then everyone else.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Jan 7 2008 : 11:20PM
Jesus H. Christ. If you want to discuss a strange performer on the IAFD, then discuss [ invalid url ]. Tell you what, that's by far the yummiest 'performer' listed in the IAFD.
Mayor of Chatsworth said: “Imagine crossing Ed Powers with Peter North, and you've got Rodney Moore.”