It's not cool for a girl to try and stop a scene only to have the guys use force to keep fucking her against her will over and over.
That said, on a totally separate topic: I love the concept you mentioned of "daisychaining", as an alternative to gangbanging. To me every extra guy in a scene is a case of 2 steps forward, 1 step back... yeah sure there's more action going on, but it's harder to film and there's no natural M/F chemistry to follow -- and like the other guy mentioned, after enough guys all you see is a circle of guys' asses blocking the view of the girl inside. And then you get the stupid group jerkoff at the end. Far better to have the girl fuck one guy at a time, have each one cum normally, and have the girl get slowly covered in cum as the scene goes on.
I think a completely unedited scene might be going too far, but directors should certainly pay more attention to times when it would be good to have unedited chunks.
For example, it's incredibly hot when a girl has had a butt-plug in for a long time, I mean if it's been in there for a good few minutes, and you know that for sure because there's no cut. Then when she takes it out and puts it in her friend's mouth, what could be hotter?
This is actually extremely rare, and I wonder how much of that is because directors don't think about the possibilities and how much is because the girls (even the more daring ones) are reluctant to do it?
Can anyway recommend any good scenes with buttplugs sucked after a long stay in the love-tunnel?
Just a side note: There are some guys that have to edit in camera to save money from the editor. So you're not really missing out on cut out scenes. I don’t think you want to see the things that are edited out, seems like you want to see the things that are not shot. BTS is extra footage unless it’s just more of the same sex. Its like a hole other short scene, but with talking instead of fucking which might make it more personal. Yani Z
Suprised I haven't seen more directors adopt this scene style yet. Granted I know it would be complicated to pull off for most. I still think it is an untapped style that would keep the viewer deeply immersed in the scene. In the end it would be a lot less painful for the director and producer as well. No edits. lol *****The Dr. of Nasty*****
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jan 23 2010 : 2:29AM
In general I think there isn't enough editing in gonzo, but when a scene has a real flow this can work well. Check out Rebecca Linares/Mick Blue's scene in She's the Boss 2 for an excellent sex scene that flows really well between positions and has a great sense of spontaneity. Best scene I've ever seen from Rebecca and one the best things William H has shot imo.
I think why it hasn't become an option to think about is because a movie like that would ruin the "fantasy" of porn that a lot of people have. Guys i know that watch porn outside of a select few don't care about anything other than the sex itself. Some even skip tease sequences just to get to the action. Personally i'd buy it in a heartbeat, as i'm always seeking out BTS stuff and interviews and candids and all that. I think that's a part of why i follow a few starlets on twitter to get that aspect. The ones that actually say stuff anyway and not trying to use it as just a promo tool (Eva Angelina i'm looking at you...) ----Dread----
I think the position transition would be awesome if done right. I know that was one of the best parts of some of Jules Jordan's older movies. When they would go from fucking downstairs in the living room and then stop and walk up stairs to the bedroom with sexual encounters in between. No edits during that part, just straight through. I dislike when a scene cuts from one position and then goes directly into another. Also you get all of those cool or funny moments that are sometimes edited out on in there. *****The Dr. of Nasty*****
I would have to say to look @ Raw 2 from Evil Angel and Manuel. The scenes I have seen (no pun) he runs the camera, and fucks the girl @ the same time. Tripod shots mostly but the scenes are up to 1 hour long.
100% agree. Of course, you have to realize what most people are afraid of is an editor who has no idea what should and shouldn't be cut. I guess that's a good point but IMO, the director should be the editor as well (Or should be sitting right there in the room directing the editor). If the director has no idea what's good and what isn't, what are the chances a movie directed by that individual is going to be any good in the first place? The worst thing that's probably going to happen is you're going to have to endure less of something that was probably almost painful to watch to start with. I've seen too much porn that was nearly unedited and completely ruined by it. Edited by - randomprecision on 1/25/2010 1:17:50 AM
I love this kind of stuff. I even had a thread looking for more BTS kinds of movies. It seems to be a love it or hate it thing ( BTS or uncut stuff) Kinda like breast implants I guess.
the stuff i have been getting in the last week or so is un edited apart from maybe getting rid of the bit showing me pulling a face coz some idiot had spunked in my eye lol
