On the other hand, I give my props to Seymore and others for popularizing (well, within a rather demented somewhat wider circle I guess) a "new" sexual kink. I mean the idea of being pissed upon normally doesn't turn me on -- it doesn't repulse me either, it just seems rather pointless, and, well, a clean up job.

But being squirted by WHATEVER at ejaculation time, when animal abandonment rules -- well THAT'S JUST PLAIN HOT!! It's in a different category. It's, you know, ANIMAL heat stuff. (Besides, unlike crap, piss is bacteria clean. In fact, it's rather like our body's chemical waste dump. Few living things survive total immersion in piss. It's an acidic cleaning agent. Seriously. They used to use it to clean clothes and other stuff in the Middle Ages, or so I've learned.)

So while I think you got it going on technically Blondie, I think you need to pay more attention to the "moving the imagination art form" side of it as well.

Not that you didn't pay some attention to that side. Just not enough.

I love your screen name BTW.

It's an art form unto itself.

To understand what I mean, consider how few regulars here, or for that matter any guys here, actually refer to you as "Dumb Blonde". As you name yourself. Yet imagine how many are intrigued deah, I know you knew all that ab initio. Props.

Whanna fu*k?

We don't gotta tell you husband, you know. Stealth.

Let me be your candy man!! <gin>

Edited by - dexplorer on Sep 2 2001

[Link]

One supposes this practice (squirting) will be discussed in his trial.

The references to physical nausea as a result of watching the video, dramatic as they were, seemed a little bit clichéd. I wonder what kind of descriptions we would get if DB were to review something like this title.

It was some science fiction writer, probably Joe Haldeman, who once said that people who read science fiction to learn physics deserve what they get. To paraphrase, people who turn to porn (and especially to someone who calls himself "Seymore Butts") for sex education certainly deserve what they get.

To some people the female ejaculation concept is a political issue. There's a lot of feminist stuff about it if you search the web. Here's a link to one somewhat amusing document(a transcript of a radio show with several experts discussing the phenomenon, as well as a live demonstration).

[Link]

Speelie,
The majority of 'complaints' I've received, have been from guys mistakingly thinking that I wasn't aware of what squirting was, and in their patronizing way, have been inundating me with all the old stuff. Then there's the ones who agree that it's fake in the movies, but their wife/GF
does it for real, and "it's not pee".

There didn't seem to be anything spontaneous about it, and then when it did happen, it was overdone. But, that's just my opinion - others might indeed find it a beautiful thing.
Even so, I agree when it is filmed right, it can be very erotic.
I didn't mean to come across as "I'm so smart", but I do know what 'squirting' is, as I have learned how to do it my self, and have done it. It is very much a controlled act,
however. The only time it would be spontaneous, or involuntary, is when incontinence is involved. All I'm trying to do is dispel this 'female ejaculation' misnomer,
though even this seems to anger some people.

Take care,
DB

Reason,
Devious? Tongue-in-cheek, and cautious, maybe, but if I wanted to be devious (and why would I?), I would have been much more subtle.
I don't find Glasser unappealing at all, in fact I stated I thought he was a good looking guy, only that he did indeed look very pimp-like in those shots.
So, if I had just come out and said that I thought he was being dishonest, that is not really correct either, because I UNDERSTAND the reason he cannot just come out and say it - same reason I didn't.

quote: "The references to physical nausea as a result of watching the video, dramatic as they were, seemed a little bit clichéd."
That was nothing more than a little humor thrown in, not meant to be dramatic. Although all the squirting at the end did prove to be a bit much, that didn't bother me as much as those assholes.
I just didn't find those attractive at all.

I wasn't really asking for my review to be critiqued, but appreciate the feedback, even so.

[Link]

This has been an interesting thread to watch. DB I am not going to inundate you with links as it is VERY obvious you have reached your position after exhaustive research. I commend you on reaching and sticking to your conclusion in a rational and intellectual fashion. Descartes would be proud M'Lady! *bow*

I admit to having a large collection of videos on this subject and would agree with you that much of the material is staged or overdone VERY poorly. It is a popular fetish and the producers of the product are attempting to capitalize on the interest. Such is capitalism and so be it.

But I also have first hand experiences and somehow must reconcile what science and reason tells us and what my own experiences point to. We have SOOOO much to learn about what REALLY happens when men and women orgasm physically and mentally.

So until then I say "Damn the torpedoes! Get me a TOWEL! Full squirt ahead!" And when a Lovely Lass is giving me a facial I'll gladly accept it's erotic wetness knowing it's exciting her as well as me and I'll not bother to ask the scientific question of what it REALLY is.

Shiver me Timber! Har!

Phadrus00

[Link]