Featured New Release
Box cover for Equilibrium Ep 3
Equilibrium Ep 3
Studio: Deeper
Release date: 8/6/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 690 > Adult Movies/Actors/Actresses at the IMDB
AuthorPost
Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 11 2004 : 4:43PM
Having submitted a few titles recently, it seems, not even major international studios like Private care about entries of their movies in the International Movie Database.

It also seems, every (USAnian) B-movie support-role actor in mainstream movies has a photo in the IMDB, but even well known contract-stars like Racquel Darrian, Janine Lindemulder or Jodie Moore, e.g., do not have a portrait submitted, not to speak of a picture gallery.

Is there any reason for this?

Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11017 Posts
5/01
Posted - Jul 11 2004 : 4:51PM
I don't think most people turn to the Internet Movie Database (IMDB) for adult films, hence why most studios wouldn't care about the listings there. For adult films I think most people use the Internet Adult Film Database (IAFD) which has headshots for many stars.
cv
Member

My reviews[/url]
594 Posts
7/03
Posted - Jul 11 2004 : 5:27PM
IAFD always had a mainstream focus since its inception as resource for the rec.arts.movies Usenet newsgroup and throughout most of the Nineties as a user-contributed community. In 1998, IAFD was bought out by Amazon.com.

Meanwhile, a separate adult film database was being created at IAFD; it was associated with the alt.sex.movies newsgroup and later rec.arts.movies.erotica (after the former succumbed to spam).

Currently, there is no logic for people to contribute data to IMDB. Neither Amazon.com nor its affiliates sell adult movies. Also, the adult film database has some special features to its database scheme which help identify things that porn viewers wish to know (e.g., "How many times has Mark Davis partnered with Jenna Haze?" or "How many DPs has Gauge done?").

The terms of use for Amazon.com/IMDB would not allow for the types of reviews commonly submitted for adult films either.

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 10:47AM
My preferences are:
1.IMDB, 2(tie). egafd/orgazmik, 4(tie). IAFD/eurobabeindex.

The "problem" of IAFD is it's bias to US productions.
OTOH, if one is interested in european productions, egafd does not only lack info on US-stuff, but also Private.
It is also a little bit difficult to search by director on egafd and eurobabeindex.

Various online stores may have also a good databases. Orgazmik, e.g., serves also well, but with exception of a few actors, the various akas are not merged like in the fabulous egafd and eurobabeindex.

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 10:56AM
The 'bias' to US productions is/was mainly due to where the contributors were located. They tried (unsuccessfully) to recruit more European contributors so that they could fill in what they recognized as a gap.

DenverDon

 
Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 11:34AM
"It is also a little bit difficult to search by director on egafd and eurobabeindex."

Well, it's not the point of the site (and it will never be) so it's a bit unfair as a judgement.
You have a link to many boxcovers (some of which are custom scans), so it's not even that hard to make your own research.

Zartyr
Member

700 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 1:23PM
It was not meant as a critic, and I am aware of the facts you stated.
If you ask me, the Union of Porn Producers should give people like you at least a place in "The Hall of Fame" for work, they themselves should have been already doing.
I mean, go at the site of $racing/sports_league, and you will find information about all teams and drivers/athletes.
Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 2:56PM
I know, don't worry.
But, as far as our site is concerned, I don't think we'll ever be able to become a proper database and maintain the same accuracy and the same spirit.
Jeff @ IAFD All-Star Supporter
Webmaster IAFD.COM

931 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 12 2004 : 3:32PM
We WISH!

You have us confused (typo, I'm sure) with IMDB, who otherwise fits all the criteria above... but I sure liked the idea of a large wad of Amazon bucks in our backpocket for a moment....

The database was actually Peter's long before a.s.m. or RAME. As the story asI tell it goes like this: he maintained a database of films he watched, so we wouldn't see the same one twice. then, he started adding movies he wanted to see... finally, he added anything he could get info on.

The database was then put onlinein '95 or '96 by heretic who used it as a way to learn SGML programming. When he went and joined the armed forces in '98 or so, the site 404d out of existence.

Then, I needed to learn SQL Server Web Programming, I talked to Peter, and the rest as they say... we've been running IAFD.COM in its current incarnation since Feb '99.

Agreed. Post your reviews here at ADT and they'll find their way into the IAFD due to the sharing arrangements we have. (Think of it like the "extenal reviews" from IMDB, as opposed to the "user comments").



Jump To: