Reviewers Recommend Devil in Her - review by Danielmayu33216 Director: Sid Knox Starring: Danny Mountain, Seth Gamble, Cherry Kiss, Nade Nasty, Milan Ponjevic, Charlie Valentine, Octavia Red, Isa Bella. Read review
Recently on my Instagram feed, a clip popped up of Taylor Swift making out with, rather randomly, Brandi Love. The clip had that slightly weird sheen that all AI clips have, but it looked reasonably convincing and photo-realistic. If I was a female celebrity, I would be increasingly uneasy about things like this. Give it a couple of years, or maybe five years, AI videos will be astonishingly realistic. That sex tape I'd like to see of Taylor Swift eating out Sydney Sweeney will only be a click or two away.
^I would love to see good A.I porn but my taste is more toward past porn performers being brought back and doing all the stuff they never did when they were active. That's not to say that I would be opposed to celebrities being in the mix but it's a given that if anyone decides to go the celebrity route then they can kiss goodbye to any chance of making money because they will lose it and more in court when they get sued and they will get sued. That's why I don't expect to see any site/studio offer celebrity A.I porn.
^I suppose it depends how accessible the technology will become. If, say five years from now, AI is all pervasive, it'll be almost impossible to police, I imagine. Even if 'responsible' producers won't do that sort of stuff, someone will be doing it online, somewhere.
I've been getting a lot of come-ons on FB from companies offering AI porn scenarios. The tease offers a few free episodes before you have to pay, but at least one has some hardcore content, and it's pretty impressive. Check out https://redseries.net/series/sp00kybby-night-in-deal?
I've made a few girl/girl kissing videos with Grok, all AI generated women, never attempted to use images of celebrities, afraid I'll get sued or worse! but Grok has the most realistic generations of anything else out there in my opinion, when you prompt a kissing sequence it's almost like it takes a life of it's own, the drawback is no explicit sex with Grok, and even just kissing it's highly moderated at times, I tried another AI platform once, and thought the AI generated models (I guess you could call them models) were a little too cartoonish looking, where Grok is super realistic, here's a word of caution from my own perspective, if I were able to generate hyper realistic AI explicit porn, to my exact specifications, real porn would be over for me, and that's the slippery slope, I could see a future where real adult stars who really want to make a living doing porn may lose business, Hell the entire porn business model could suffer a downturn, if everyone could just create AI porn, I don't want that to happen, but the hundreds of videos I've seen over many years to be honest I'm still searching for that perfect one, where the camera angles are right, the models are right, the setting is right, I could count only about 10 videos over a lifetime of collecting that come close to meeting my perfect expectations, 10 videos of a hundred thousand hours of video I've seen over many years, so yeah if I could generate my own particular style of porn on a computer, I may stop subscribing to sites, stop buying DVD's, real porn would be over, and it would be over for everyone probably, and sadly.
At first it was free but limited, then it became membership only and was fairly reasonable, this was back in the good old days, and the models were prettier, they had a young European look, the moderation was less strict too, now it's way more expensive, out of my price range, actually you can get it if you subscribe to X, that started out at about $20/month, but the other day was looking at my bank statements and noticed X charged me $40/month, so I canceled it, but there was a quota with that, you could generate about a couple dozen generations and video then wait about a week before you could make anymore, to get what they call super Grok and I hope your sitting down, $300/month but that's limited too! they say it's unlimited but it is, they offered it at $100/month awhile back, I tried it, yes I'm a fool and paid the 100 bucks but was extremely disappointed when I discovered it was limited, can't remember how many generations but it was totally not un-limited, but what really kills it, and you hear a lot of complaints at various forums, the moderation is way too strict, even people who aren't using it for porn are complaining, another thing they get you, if your generation fails to make a video, in other words moderated, that goes against your quota, I wish I could show you some of the images I was able to generate but the moderators here won't allow it I found out the hard way, actually I just checked and the pricing changes constantly, asking Grok it says for the plus plan is $8/month, premium plan is $30/month, Super is $100/month, Ultra $200/month, you could join X and get a bundle package, X with a blue check mark, and Grok, not sure the price on that though.
This looks very good. My guess is that all those stories contain 5 segments. Together will be 5 or 6 minutes.
I was waiting for this. This is only the beginning.
Although I must say... these are rather clean Naughty America like scenes.
I would really be interested pornscenes that are rare or too expensive to shoot in the mainstream porn.. with alot of anal / ass to mouth/ spitting / peeing etc.
Thanks so much for that. All that cash and no actual sex! If you want to check out a source of AI porn then have a look at Pornbox. They've got a lot of sites dedicated to AI generated porn that isn't the result of faceswaps and so OK. I've joined Ai XXX ShaD for a month and it's actually pretty good. If you follow the link you can see the site and the trailers. There's also a few pics you can look at. Ai XXX ShaD Chanel on Pornbox
^ Absolutely. These sites are generating stuff a long way from the old very cartoon-like content I was seeing a while ago. When you watch these you can see how they've had to process in chunks of around 20 seconds and splice it together.
I've said before, to some chagrin lol, that porn performers mostly act like bots (the market programs them to perform this way) and that a large part of the viewership isn't interested in performers actually moving and acting like people. That's true and there is some evidence to it here, in mainstream content:
Further, not only will a significant number of people not care that what's on screen is fake (they can hardly tell a difference anyway) but they will ultimately come to prefer the clearly lifeless but very animated action that AI content will provide.
When I pasted the link and saved, the URL in the post was not as I saved it. If this doesn't work, the video is on his @atriocclips "Big A" account, posted 4 days ago and the video title is "This Is Invading Our Phones and Brains."
This is a hugely complex subject and you seem to be trying to generalise without much concrete evidence (that video definitely doesn't provide it!)
1) I think it grossly disrespectful to the majority of porn performers that you say they mostly act like 'bots'. As in all jobs involving 'performance' some put their heart and soul into it and some don't. Those of us who've watched porn far longer than they perhaps should can tell which girls are into what they're doing and which ones are disinterested and just picking up a pay cheque. The ones which last the longest in the business and have the largest fanbase tend to have some unique 'features' whether that's bodily or personality or a mixture of the two. 2) You don't have to go through many of the threads on here to find plenty of talk of people moaning about pornstars not performing the way they like or not giving it their all. I sensed there was a lot of talk on threads where people were moaning that a lot of lesbian scenes involve girls who are just doing it for the cash and show little or no passion. Conversely there are loads of people banging the drum of their latest 'crush' who they champion as the best and most convincing porn performer ever! There will be a large range of people with different views and some won't care if those in the scene are 'moving or acting as people' as long as someone is getting enthusiastically fucked in the way that they like! Others most definitely will care. 3) The insatiable thirst for AI produced 'microdramas' is hardly novel. It's a natural extension of what mainstream TV have been pumping out for decades. That hasn't stopped people going to the theatre or going to the cinema or endulging in a whole range of activities that involve real people doing real things. The existence of one doesn't necessarily lead to the extinction of another. Fake mass-produced porn will appeal to some while others will stick with real people and their favourite stars doing what they do. Alternatively they will follow their OF or whatever to engage directly with them and buy content that way. 4) The reasons why different people like or engage in different activities is really complex. In porn there will be some who are fussed about the personality of an affiliation to a particular star and some will be happy just consuming pass produced soulless content. I suspect that the sort of people who consume porn now will look at the new stuff but still maintain a preference for action involving real people showing real emotions. 5) I've watched quite a bit of AI porn recently and I find it fascinating! The quality in many cases is not far off convincing video and some of the AI 'models' are stunning. For all that it's clearly still just 'robotic' stuff that is way off anything vaguely close to sex between two adult human beings. My favourite scenes are the occasional one where in a complex position someone's leg is completely the wrong way round or similar glitch!
In short, I believe the advent of AI is a 'wake-up' call for the porn industry giving them a real need to focus on meaningful scenes involving committed and enthusiastic performers. I would be really worried about the face-swap technology where you can potentially create scenes and make it look like a real pornstar. This technology is already frighteningly good. I just don't buy the notion that AI will inevitably replace all porn involving real pornstars.
AI doesn't have a soul, therefore it is not strokeable. The sexual tension that comes from our short finite existence is completely missing from this nonsense.
There's quite a few camera angles I don't see much in real porn, I've asked a few sites to get that particular shot, mostly to no avail, except one, and it's nothing immoral, nothing I don't think performers would mind doing anyway, or the camera person, or the studio, if I could tailor something to my specific taste is the main reason I'm holding out hope for explicit AI generated porn, some of the stuff I've created with Grok is very pretty but not explicit, no genitalia, browsing the forums it seems most people are interested in a kind of gonzo type porn that doesn't interest me at all, like girls with dicks, or big gargantuan tits, it leaves me to wonder am I the only one who prefers normal size breast!?
^ Girls with dicks are a novelty but not really for me. The gargantuan boobs also look amazing initially but then that wains! The people doing those vids need seem to think that's what people want but the reality is that most people probably prefer 'normal' looking girls. I love girls with big boobs but some of those on AI are just ridiculous!
Have you tried any of these sites where you can pay to design your own 'model' and engage with her and produce content based on your preferences? I've no idea if they're any good any it costs too much for me to buy into it only to find it's a scam!
Whether the porn was made by a real person won't matter to the majority of people. Judging by most comments on porn that I have read, a great many people literally won't be paying attention enough to tell it's not a real woman or care if they happen to notice.
About the average performers acting like bots: the content that is out there is very algorithmed to hell. The way they act in videos, the personas, the very sequence of the actions in the content...it's all very iterated based on the dominant meta as a strategy. And that leaves the vast majority of the stuff open to being copycatted. The jerky, distant, vacant movement of AI porn is *matched* by the majority of what is produced in live-action. Most of this stuff is algorithm-driven copycatting with poorly-feigned, awkward on-camera behavior. And that is also how the AI stuff looks.
That's what a disinterest in the concept of pleasure in porn content has rendered!
^ I'm sorry but you can't synthesize a porn scene down to a set of actions and personas that you can repeat ad infinitum and think people either won't notice or be bothered by, no matter what you've 'read'! In any case, exactly the same scene in terms of location, sequence of positions, camera angles etc performed by a different pair of pornstars will look and feel very different and get very different reactions from people who watch them. You can't just synthesise down people's 'look', personality and, most importantly, the way they interact to produce a perfect replica. How individuals respond to porn is dependent on a range of different factors and everyone has a different set of likes and dislikes that you just can't factor in to make the perfect porn scene. Thinking that people won't be 'bothered' just fails to understand human psychology.
Your description of 'live porn' as 'jerky, distant, vacant movement' is something you occasionally see but the vast majority of scenes I watch across a whole range of genres just don't fit into this. To be honest, if you've got such a low and cynical view of the overwhelming majority of porn scenes I'm struggling to understand what you're doing on here. Perhaps you should use your time expanding your experience of different genres of porn!
Can't distill the performers' behaviors down to the jerky awkwardness and the things they have learned to meme/copy/repeat over and over? My brother in porndom, the performers and studios have mostly flattened themselves that way already. No one is serving realness. Whether the consumer feels the porn is good or not is largely correlated to whether they think the performer is cute. Under AI, the "perfection" of the performer for the individual user will not be in question.
It's possible that even when people want some spontaneity outside of what they tell AI to generate, a good number of those folks seeking something new will just watch the AI slop that other people have generated.
^ ...and the objective evidence that you are basing all this on is?!!! Perhaps you could enlighten us on how much actual porn you've watched and which genres..and while you're at it how much AI porn have you actually watched?
Recently came across this on Twitter while following Mia Malkova. No opinions or comments from my side; I'm just sharing an example of what AI is bringing to viewers. And this is only the beginning! Title: Mia Malkova Is My Girlfriend's Step-Mom Website: candyshorts.com
Okay, this is what I think will happen in the future:
On one side, we'll have OnlyFans and other creator-owned websites continuing to grow. On the other, we'll see a boom in AI-generated content platforms, including websites featuring AI content inspired by pornstars who have retired from the industry.
Traditional studios will find themselves sandwiched between these two forces, offering opportunities to both newcomers and popular stars.
All three models will coexist, but the big question is: Which model will be most effective at capturing the subscriber market? Or will the audience simply be divided among all three, with fans enjoying content across every platform?
I dont have data. You may as well assume I am literally lying, for all I car. We are just talking.
Dude, people have large-language-model girlfriends/boyfriends. Relatively nobody cares when the performers' acting during the sexual activity is terrible. People love watching literal drawn/cartoon porn. People loved deep fakes before fake videos were halfway decent.
AI porn is happening and a good portion of the few people who buy are not gonna care that the video didn't actually happen at the next level of visual fidelity. Heck, they really don't care at the current level lol.
I have only watched like 3 minutes of AI porn across various ads and preview trailers most often shown to me against my will. Like I was saying earlier, AI porn looks stiff and awkward and just off/uncanny valley (as does most live-action porn).
I don't like when the live-action porn looks retarded, so I am certainly not going to seek out content that looks even more off. However...fewer and fewer people will notice a difference or care when the porn doesn't have real people. I think this will prove truer of porn buyers moreso than the average occasional pornhub visitor.
It's going to affect the money a lot.
Once user can type "Angela White Sasha grey Jenna jameson stepmom BBC foursome in Narnia" and a computer just spits out a 8 minute clip of that, buyers will gladly accept it.
I'm not saying no more live-action porn, but not watching real performers will be fairly common.
^^ Don't worry! I realised that you were just making it up as you went along purely based on your personal feelings and perspectives. You should watch some of the AI stuff....might make you chill out a bit! There are some great vids of women with huge tits dressed as elves getting fucked in the ass by aliens with three cocks. It's the future of porn!!
My experience with Grok, which is highly censored, no genitalia, not really any full frontal nudity, but close sometimes, for example if you prompt topless. Often it's fully nude but their bodies are positioned in a way that won't show the crotch area, but these nude pictures won't generate a video to save your ass! Let's say you have two women sitting beside one and other and try to get them to kiss, won't work unless their wearing shorts or bikini bottoms, but just topless will work, made hundreds of topless kissing videos, I was lucky enough to discover one day about 3 months ago the Grok moderation must have developed a glitch because I was getting away with tit sucking, hand in crotch masturbating, but through shorts or panties never nude. The next day it wouldn't do it anymore, so for one fleeting moment I saw the future of AI porn, or what it could potentially be, I've prompted "two women standing facing each other with unbuttoned collar flannel shirts topless, pantie bottoms, or bikini bottomles, in an old cabin" to give it that cowgirl look, the pictures turned out exceptional! Now just create a video of them kissing by prompting "Girl on left kissing girl on right continuously aggressively while pulling their shirts off" if you don't write continuously aggressively it'll be little pecking kind of kissing, continuously aggressively gives you some tongue action, and they will pull each other's shirts off, very sexy! But videos are only 10 second which can be extended, the problem with attempting to extend a video is, at first you just had two women standing there not touching at the starting point, but while their kissing the algorithm thinks Oh My God there's sex going on there! I can't extend this scene anymore! In other words you aften very likely to get some kissing action the first 10 seconds, but get moderated attempting to add another 10 seconds. Sometimes it works sometimes not, but I've made some 30 second clips of two women kissing, I think women kissing is basically sex!
Grok imagine can be very realistic, it's the most detailed representation of the human body and facial features I've seen, but you can make it cartoonist or anime if you prompt it to do so. Which I've done many times. I wish I could post some of my creations here but they won't allow it, I wish there could be a thread for AI content only, it would be awesome, to hell with the naysayers!
I came across an Ai video today. 11 minutes with 2 famous women kissing, lesbian and it ended in a FFMM foursome. It looked better then I have seen before. With interaction!! What was missing is the natural change of poses. From one pose to the next one was a cut.
Since this one obvious was illegal use of someones face this must have been made by an amateur.
If an amteur can make this think about the possiblities professionals can make happen.
Use of famous pornfaces off course with consent of the original artist.
If I worked in the industry I would develop my own line of actors. In the future there will be stars that don't excist in real life. So I think the legal use of real life pornactors is only an temporary thing.
Unless Mia gave her okay on these people using her name and likeness for this Tiny AI video then the people behind this will get a legal notice to remove the content and it won't take long. Ultimately that is the biggest issue with anyone trying to make money using existing individuals for their AI model. Creating the content may or may not be illegal per se but making money from distributing it definitely is. I wouldn't recommend anyone buy a long term membership for this site because it may get shut down real fast.
^ The problem at the moment is that the more accurate and realistic you want the video to be the longer it takes to produce. From my observations of the bona fide AI sites, they seem to be a succession of 20 to 25 second clips arranged in sequence. There's no natural movement from one to another.
The face swap technology is already frighteningly realistic...even using fairly basic free tools available on the internet.
^^I don't know what permissions are required to publish AI content featuring their faces, but on the website, I saw Riley Reid's face alongside Lacy Lennon and Lexi Luna (who is still performing). Yes, there's a chance these platforms could be shut down soon, but there's already a lot of content with such titles that can easily grab people's attention and attract viewers. Mike Quasar made a valid point in the SweetheartVideo thread when he said that the next generation of fans might not be able to tell what's real and what's AI-generated. As I mentioned earlier, the industry will find itself sandwiched between traditional content, onlyfans/manyvids content and AI-generated alternatives. One thing is certain: they'll introduce a lot more AI content. People on this forum might not take this AI nonsense too seriously, but you never know how social media could change fans' perspectives and viewing habits.
AI directors will enter the market alongside AI performers, not to mention AI-generated locations, which will significantly reduce production costs.
The industry is already facing plenty of challenges, but in the future, AI could be the biggest challenge it has ever faced. The writing is on the wall.
^ Not really sure what social media has to do with it. The real girls have a big advantage there as they're real people with a real presence. The AI generated pornstars can't really have that reach. We'll see if people can't tell the difference between real porn and AI. At the moment even with the best it's easy to tell. Getting the faces of real people or real pornstars into AI productions would be a game changer but I'm not sure that will ever be sanctioned without massive legal push back. There's currently a novelty in seeing the face of a know face in an AI generated production but the match between face and body often looks wrong. Loads of those sites have been taken down.
I suspect AI will become a bit like tube sites. Most of them won't seek permission, they'll just churn out explicit material using the faces of porn stars and celebs.
I was wrong when I said permission would be required for this, because Mia Malkova herself is promoting her AI sexual content and the CandyShorts website. LOL! On Twitter, her promotional content has already pulled in over 200K impressions in just two days. AI porn has barely entered the chat, and we're already seeing this! Nobody knows how far this will go or how badly it could shake up traditional studios, which are already dealing with real performers moving to OnlyFans and producing their own content. Now imagine AI websites taking permission from real performers, offering them royalties or some kind of revenue-sharing deal, and then incorporating their likenesses or content into AI productions. That could create an entirely different business model, where performers earn from AI while these platforms attract audiences. last year, I read an article on LinkedIn about an AI adult website reportedly earning $71,000 in a week and gaining 10K subscribers. That's why I keep saying that traditional studios won't simply shut down or disappear. They'll survive and adapt. If AI technology experiences a major boom over the next 5-10 years, I can't deny that possibility just because I personally don't like it. In this AI-driven world, anything can happen! Who would have thought that the DVD business would transform so dramatically into the streaming industry? And who would have imagined that the adult entertainment industry would become so divided between OnlyFans and traditional studios?
I'm not exaggerating AI's potential here; it's just a logical discussion about what the future might hold. However, one thing is certain: I won't be supporting AI-generated adult content or movies, and I definitely won't be reviewing them on AdultDVDTalk. LOL!
Devil in Her - review by Danielmayu33216
Posted - Jun 23 2026 : 7:41PM
