Introducing Natasha Carter| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| john_qyoo_public Deactivated User 265 Posts 7/05 | I downloaded a lot of pics lately to replace what I lost when a partition went bad. I see shitloads of what look like airbrushed pics, but I don't see how they can be. They have a very homogenous look, and there are zillions of them. Some girls would need a full time artist to do all of that. Take Lisa Daniels as an example, I'm seeing hundreds and hundreds of these pics. I think they look like shit, really really horrible, but that's not the point. The point is, is there a set of Photoshop actions that Webmasters use or what? No way in hell they're paying for all that to be done by hand. Is there? P.S., whoever's doing this, please stop. It looks like complete shit. Do the hair, makeup, and lighting, but leave the pics alone except for honest color correction or whatever. It does...not...look...good...at...all. I much prefer the amateur look of Polaroids to the shit you're putting out. [Link] |
| RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06 | To answer your question, they are probably using programs that allow you to set a filter (or a group of filters) for batch processing so that every photo will have exactly the same look. I could be wrong but I just can't imagine these guys sitting around doing all this by hand. This is probably one reason why it always looks so bad. There's nobody there actually checking to make sure each individual picture looks it's best. That would be very time consuming but the results would probably be much better overall. There comes a point where "enhancement" just becomes laziness. |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |