HOWEVER, if you go into it with the right expectations, there's still plenty to like about that disc, particulrarly if you're a Cytherea fan at all. Anyway, for more specifics about my thoughts, I direct you to my post in a Cytherea thread in Star Crossed.

Anyway, my point is I certainly agree with you as far as its badly represented claim as a virtual sex disc, but as a Cytherea slavering fan-boy, I'll be the first to say that she alone is worth it.

Edited by - MLyons on 4/1/2004 1:46:04 PM

[Link]

This is again the same attitude of total contempt for the porn consumer. Just cause we like to jerk off they think they can just swindle us.

[Link]

Just because you don't like a title it does'nt mean it's bad. Obviously you liked it enough to buy three volumes of the series. I apologzie in advance if you did not like it, but it was not done by the Anarchy's directors. It was done by John Yuma. Anarchy and Python have produced different lines that are enjoyed by many consumers. For example: London Shaggers 1-6, Anal Fever 1-5, Perverted POV, Creamed 1-2, Twisted, Pop That Cherry1-5, and No Cum Spitting which all became best sellers in a few days. So, we have different lines of movies that can appeal to different people. The title Creamed we have released eight months a go and it still sells like crazy. always remember, one man's garbedge is another man's treasure. If you don't like the Virtual line, don't buy it. We producing this line for one reason only, that the people who like the Twins, Shayla, Christi, Cytherea, and Olivia can have something fun and interactive to watch.

And to you Mlyons, you are like Simone from American Idol, you just like to slam movies.

I personally think that within a year in business, Anarchy Films came along way. Look at our first ever production " Internal Explosion" and take a look at "No Cum Spitting" It is sitting as of today at number 12 on the charts, chilling with RedLight and Vivid. And it is only one week out. Take a look at the "Anal Life", take a look at Creamed 1 and 2, take a look at "Perverted POV". After you have seen those movies, than you can form an objective opinion.

You know what Tritone, e-mail me your address I'll ship you screeners from those movies. If you don't like them, you can slam my company as much as you want. But, if you like them, you own me an opology.

Oren
Anarchy/Python

[Link]

When you slap the word "Virtual" on a box, there is a certain expectation by the consumer based on past products. We are thinking -- "Point of View Sex", perphaps multi-angle, etc.

I am just dissapointed because I thought these products would appeal to me based on the descriptions and they have failed miserably. It is obvious this was just an attempt to captialize on the success of "Virtual" and POV sex discs without doing the work to actually make a flick like this.

Edited by - tritone on 4/1/2004 6:30:41 PM

[Link]

You can get defensive if you like, but I found a lot to like about Cytherea's disc and I said as much above. However:

The box advertises multiple angles -- Unless you count non-POV angles in a sequential fashion that the viewer has no control over, the DVD format's multi-angle feature was not utilized.

The box advertises POV sex -- It does offer that to some degree, and I understand the need for virtual discs to cheat the POV angle at times in the interest of seeing the girl better, but without true-multi-angle, the viewer had no control over whether he/she is seeing POV or not. This is certainly not a trait of the "virtual sex" genre.

The box advertises a "personal lap dance" -- I don't remember there being anything of the kind, unless you count a very brief section of the bonus scene, but there was nothing virtual or personal about it.

The box advertises a POV Bonus scene -- I loved the bonus scene for my own reasons, but there was absolutely nothing POV about it.

Again, and I'll say it multiple times if I have to. I LIKED the disc, I LOVE Cytherea, but as an entry into the virtual sex genre it's sadly lacking, and I don't believe any gripe I made in my original post was unfounded. Where you come up with the idea that I just like to slam movies is beyond me.

I'm glad you're posting here, and watching the forums, but please understand I'm not attacking you personally, nor is tritone even with his strong language in the thread title. We're simply pointing out flaws in the discs we've seen that we don't want other people to fall victim to. It's our right as consumers. Defensiveness about this kind of thing isn't going to help you. Going out and making it better will.

It's just my opinion, maybe another consumer who liked it will come on and refute my points. I'm all for it. That's what we're here for. :)

Edited by - MLyons on 4/1/2004 6:40:31 PM

[Link]

Regarding MLyons, he is one person that hands out comments in one of the most even handed manners - the good, the bad, and the ugly.

[Link]

I appriciate your guys input and I'll do anything I can to deliver Quality over Quantity. Input is always welcome. I know that there are hundred companies out there and I am thankful that consumers choose Anarchy over some one else.

Thank you again for your input,

Oren
Anarchy/Python

--------------------------------
dig at other company removed -steph

Edited by - Steph on 4/6/2004 2:08:51 PM

[Link]

... and you will get comments from all sides of the spectrum.

("She doesn't do anal, I'm not buying.")

DenverDon

[Link]

I'm not into this whole Virtual Sex thing.

[Link]