I think the supply is there, and I'll bet the demand is, too -- unless, to get back to the question that was asked, there's someone doing something similar that I don't know about.

[Link]

There are times when you'll find a girl that fits that criteria. Maybe even lots of times. But can you really depend on it being a regular thing? Can you be sure that you'll get the same number of women who don't want to do porn agreeing to shoot porn with you in June that you got in May and April?

It's not a reliable talent base.

The only way to ensure you keep getting girls that fit that criteria is to game the system somehow. In GDP's case, we know what they did.

But it's an impossible business model.

[Link]

I haven;t heard of any lawsuits from victimized "moms." I wonder why? Were the moms told they were going to be on the Internet? Or are the moms sharper than the girls and knew what was really going on?

Is my memory wrong, or did, quite a while ago, Amateur Allure have a pretty good run wherein they had a lot of one - or few and dones, many of whom were pretty hot, as well as some women who were very early in their careers, if not making their first scenes?

Again, throw out the false pretenses, and it seems to me like, in a nation of 300 million, you could still get a fairly decent stream of reasonably attractive girls who'd be willing to do a porn shoot for a lark, on a dare, or because they needed a one-time infusion of cash. (Of course, presentation is crucial, too, and both AA and GDP excelled at that.)

[Link]

There's isn't a consistent stream of women out there who are willing to do porn, but only once or twice just because they need the money. You might be able to find one or two a month, but any site that tries to go this route is either gonna have to lie to the girls to get them there (like GirlsDoPorn) or get agents to send them girls who just started in the industry so you can pretend like you're finding these girls off the street (like Exploited College Girls). Even going through cam sites and propositioning models that way isn't gonna get you enough women interested to consistently update a website.

[Link]

GDP's problems weren't that they couldn't get women to do porn. It's the way they went about it that was the problem. We will never know how many of the women who appeared on GDP were aware that this was going to be seen by anyone with a computer and internet access. All we know is that a percentage of them were under some kind of delusion that no one they know would see it.

[Link]

I didn't say there wasn't a steady stream of women willing to do porn. I said there isn't a steady stream of women willing to do one or two scenes and then stop. If you're okay with them having careers afterwards, then yes you can find a steady stream of women who are willing to shoot for you. But, if like GDP, you are using the fact that these women aren't shooting for other sites as a selling point, then it becomes much harder.

[Link]

Exploited College Girls, Backroom Casting Couch and Black Ambush to name just three still get plenty of unknowns to do porn and most of the women who work for these sites never work for any other studio. I mean both ECG and BCC have been doing this for a dozen years. The only difference between them and GDP is that no one has tried to sue them because they thought their videos would never be seen by any of their friends and family.

[Link]

Backroom Casting Couch also has a history of exploiting women and lying about the release of their videos, they just haven't/hadn't hit the point of getting taken to court over it, probably because it looks like they were a little more honest in their lie, saying that the scenes would be on the web, but behind a paywall. Also, ECG pretty explicitly gets a lot of performers who are actually professional and just shooting their first scenes, many of whom actually even have agents (there's more than a few who women who get sent to Arizona to shoot for both FTV and ECG at the same time). And they've generally been doing that for BlackAmbush and BRCC (which they now own, but I'm not sure if they always have) recently as well. Sometimes these women end up quitting after a few scenes, sometimes they don't, but they're generally not there to only shoot those scenes and stop. To repeat what I said a third time, it's isn't that these women don't exist, it's that there aren't enough of them to continually update a website (as in on a weekly basis), so your options are either to hire professionals or to lie.

Edit: And like I said earlier, the difference between ECG and GDP in general is that while GDP tried to pride itself on the exclusivity of its performers (and I remember talking to one of them that was a cam model and her telling me that they also made women sign contracts that said they were exclusive to them for months after they shot their scenes, so even if they wanted to enter the industry at large they would have to wait), ECG actually plays up when their models become legit stars:

[Tweet is no longer available]

They, as a site, focus as much on getting girls first as they do getting them exclusively.

Edited by - whatsatelephonebill on 2/12/2020 11:47:46 PM

[Link]