I think a guy's natural inclination is to "leave it in" as long as possible after he ejaculates. I don't think it's natural to cum on the chic's face, or to cum in her and then immediately pull out, letting the fluid seep out. That leads me to the question: Aren't there any scenes where the dude does what we would do in the situation: Cum in the girl, and leave it in until it shrinks up and falls out? I'm usually done watching the scene by that point, but if we are going to have a scene where they guy ejaculates internally, why not have it more realistic? Maybe someone has tried this and it just does not sell?
The thing about movies is that they need to show some movement. Because people get tired quickly of looking at a still picture. Perhaps your idea would work well, if it's modified and adapted for a movie. Instead of having the guy stop his fucking completely, it might be better to have him slow down and repeatedly try to penetrate his lady as far as he possibly can. This is actually what I try to do with any lady, who lets me stay inside her after I cum. It's more pleasant this way, than simply staying inside her without any movement at all. But this kind of slow fucking often makes me regain my desire to fuck her harder and faster again. And if it's sex without condoms, then the cum lubrication from the first fuck leads to a really wild, almost frictionless, second fuck. I can at least double my speed on the lady with all that cum lubrication. I think this kind of thing would look pretty good in a movie. Because movies are all about movement. The better the movement, the more interesting is the movie to watch. Edited by - Dan on 7/1/2011 10:43:26 AM
Um...I don't nut inside and leave it in there. I fill her up and pull it out as soon as I'm done. You should have said it's what you do or what you'd like to do. Not what "we" would do. But I get what you're saying. I say after I fill it up there's no need to be in the pussy any longer.
There is no right or wrong way to do this kind of thing. Every guy has his own personal taste. But this is the reason to make a variety of sex action, so that porn fans of various likes and dislikes get to see what they want to see. And the thing about watching a movie is that it's different from actually having sex. Because you don't have your cock in the lady, when you watch a movie. And you don't get the same sensations that you get when you are having sex yourself. That's why porn sex needs to be adapted and made more visually appealing in terms of movement and looks. It's all visual and nothing else for the viewer. Edited by - Dan on 7/1/2011 11:00:04 AM
People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11
Posted - Jul 1 2011 : 2:01PM
[/quote] This kind of training is called inhibition of natural tendencies. Edited by - Dan on 7/1/2011 12:23:34 PM [/quote] It will not be a natural tendency if you have a fear of hearing those dreaded words .......I'm pregnant and having the baby. Some guys will learn the hard way, but they will learn.
Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08
Posted - Jul 3 2011 : 1:19PM
Why not have it more ralistic is a good question. Me, and I believe most guys, fuck harder or the continue the same stroke just before, during and after the ejaculation. For me, its why I actually prefer using a condom, because I continue fucking until I begin to lose my erection. So there is plenty of movement or action for the porn shoot, in fact there is as much or more action if the porn stud fuck through the ejaculation, than there was during the prior part of the vaginal sex segement. I have seen this implied in a few porn scenes in which the cum shot was botched or unattainable. However, during the era of true amateur porn in the 90s, I liked seeing it for real a few times. Capturing the lond, hard, deep strokes at climax is something that the industry has ruled out. I think it would sell. Some studios, like Sweet Sinner, claim to capture real orgasms and portray sex realisticly, but that is just B.S. and it is just a different variety unrealistic sex.
Maybe you misunderstood what I wrote. I never said he was wrong and that I was right. I just said he should change the part about leaving it in after the pussy is filled with cum..from it's what "we" do, to it's what I do or what I'd like to see. It's not what "we" do. At least I don't. Yes I'm aware he's not the only one in the world to do that but I'm not the only one that doesn't. As I posted above as soon as I fill it up I'm out. The pussy is there to make me orgasm and as soon as I do I pull my dick out. And no I'm not fighting any instinct by doing that. I'd actually hate it if I had to leave it in after I finished. My dick is so sensitive after it spits nut that I'd prolly die of laughter after the sex!
