I was going to write this in a reply to a thread on a movie I wanted to discuss, but figured this would be the better way to go:)
Re: "The Art of Sex" from Viv Thomas
Just saw (and purchased) this two year-old movie. I just found it because it's not that easy to find Viv Thomas stuff browsing my standard sites. It's amazing to think how much money is wasted paying hot girls to do porn and turn out so much CRAP....when movies like this are possible. This movie is AMAZING and is several levels above most anything else produced. And the funny thing is, the cost to make couldn't have been much relative to other porns. There was no script, not "dialogue", no fancy sets to pay to decorate, NO STUPID FUCKING COSTUMES, no stupid special effects. Then I think to all of the CRAP companies WASTE money to to make that does have some or all of the aforementioned costs. It's BAFFLING. The girls in this movie certainly are beautiful. BUT, the way they are "captured" and showcased is just so sexy. It's funny, I can't help but want to find some of the other stuff these hot girls have done, yet I KNOW that at best, 99.9% of the other things they have done PALE in comparison. Why? It's not because the girls aren't really that hot or aren't capable of being that great again. The reason why I know the rest of the stuff they've done is mediocre is I know what stupid porn directors (and, perhaps necessarily, the male porn audience) THINK-erroneously- is hot and seek to make. Look, once you get a gorgeous woman to fuck on camera, at least make a great, truly erotic scene. If you want to know what that looks like, watch "The Art of Sex" by Viv Thomas.
Edited by - skyway on Jul 27 2010