I'm concerned that AVN is going down the homophobic path. There are two reasons for my concerns:
a) In the last few weeks, the AVN website has stopped showing gay porn-related stories. Enquiring minds wish to know the reason for the apparent sudden change.
b) Several years ago, the AVN awards dropped the GayVN awards from the major ceremony. Enquiring minds wish to know if this was because AVN didn't wish to expose members of the straight porn industry to, shock horror, the sight of men kissing.
I don't think AVN is homophobic. Seems they recognize that the gay industry is segment of the overall adult industry.
I have seen quite a few stories on gay companies in AVN recently. Not everyday, but the gay industry is substationally smaller than the straight side. And this may sound strange, but gay studios don't need to hawk their products every few seconds. And new gay companies don't start everyday.
The switch of the GayVN awards to a seperate venue was necessary. There is not enough time to award half the awards as it is now. Especially as more and more awards are added each year. I've been to the AVN awards, and thought they were a little long.
I've never been to the GayVN Awards, but I haven't heard any complaints about it. As the gay industry grows in size (and it is) the coverage, awards, etc. will grow too.
I think AVN does as much coverage on the gay industry as is warranted.
I cook, but not Norwegian food. I must hate all Norwegians. This is also the first time all year I have spoken of Norwegians.
How large is each AVN award and how much cross-over in the industry is there? Camera crews, producers, directors, etc. seem to have little cross over. I don't go to food industry trade shows, but then again, I am not in that industry. How long does each award show run? Really at some point people are going to call it a night.
AVN is breaking GayVN off into its own own magzine, so i doubt theres any homophobia going on there. As far as the GAYVN's go i believe they choose venue based on ticket sales, so if they sold 10,000 tickets theyd have to get a venue that size to support it. If anyone at AVN wants to correct me if im wrong please do.
[Link]
arthur Deactivated User
165 Posts 9/04
Posted - Apr 1 2005 : 11:43AM
AVN should be integrating the gay and the straight, not separating them. Separation is segregation, which is a form of marginalization.
Untrue. People like specific things tailored to their own tastes, with things that they're not interested in excluded. Obviously the gay market has become large enough (for AVN) that they believe this market warrants it's own dedicated magazine.
Experiments like this either work, or they fail. If the split-off GAYVN sells well, then I'm sure it will be kept as it's own magazine. If it does not sell well, then I'd expect the two to be re-merged in a year or two.
It's not about homophobia, it's about maximising profits.
Please do a study to determine at least the following ratios of categories (worldwide):
*male - female - intersexual *blonde - brunette - red - white - other hairclour *frequency of epicanthic fold *hairlength in categories based on increments of 1 cm *homosexual - bisexual/pref.homos. - bisexual - bisexual/pref.heteros. - heterosexual *10 categories of skincolours measured against a calibrating scale from snow-white to ebony black *algolagnie positive - algolagnie tolerant - algolagnie negative *dominant - dom-sub switch - submissive *place of birth ("squares" of ten degree latitude and longitude *10 categories based on BMI *body height in increments of 0.1 meter *body mass in increments of 3 kg *IQ in increments of 10 points *age in increments of 5 years *breast circumference in increments of 0.1 meter *10 categories of penis size *10 categories of labia size *10 categories of ratio of length of extremities vs. length of body *10 categories of ratio head size vs. body length
Then create combinations of these and then investigate publications if they show a representative image of the sexual being Homo sapiens.
And don't start with such publications as AVN, which are read by a neglectable portion of the population. Start with publications like Cosmopolitan, Playboy, Sports illustrated and such.
BTW don't be too surprised if you come across a title called "Lusty Lesbian Bigtitted Grannies" to find an underrepresantation of anorhexic bald males of age 20-25.
BTW2, see your pet object are homosexuals, could you do me a favour and also look at the threadbare neglection people born in Iceland with a 30% the black/white scale, BMI of 20, and hair-length between 5-6 cm.
Since you are so altruistic, I am sure some other forum members also have some kind of people they feel are vastly underrepresented in the media and you also take special note of their pet interest group.
So lets say in five years you come back and show us your results, or maybe during this time you discover that your agenda is ... well you'll find out.
Okay, I'll try to explain it to you. Back in the 80's the CEBIT was part of the Hannover industry fair. But it needed too much space. Then it was "segregated". Today the CEBIT is the biggest computer technology fair in the world.
Got the point?
[Link]
arthur Deactivated User
165 Posts 9/04
Posted - Apr 1 2005 : 8:11PM
My view is that AVN promotes a separatist culture in which gay and bisexual men are excluded from the sexual mainstream. The separatist culture is reflected in the straight porn industry's blackballing of male actors who have appeared in both straight and gay/bi productions.
The fact is, we should be in this together, fighting for the rights of adults to view such materials without fear of government intrusion. A separatist culture is not the way to go.
Arthur, the disagreements between you and most of the people who reply to your posts can be reduced to this difference: you seem to think that porn has a significant role in shaping cultural trends and people's attitude toward sexuality, whereas most everyone else sees porn as a reflection of consumers' preferences.
It could probably be demonstrated that porn has had some effect on attitudes toward sexuality, but it simply does not follow from this that the people who produce porn (those evil corruptors of America's youth at Shane's World) or the people who write about it (AVN) have a responsibility to influence people's attitudes in any particular way. There's no reason for the porn industry to conform its behavior to some notion, yours or anyone else's, of fairness, equality or responsibility (beyond what's required by the law, of course).
In short, the fact that porn exerts an influence does not obligate it to exert a positive influence. And of course not everyone agrees on what sort of influence would be considered positive, but this thought doesn't seem to have occurred to you.
juha, he will never get the point. This is one of arthur's characteristics. He has never responded to reason or used reason in a direct rebuttal of the points others have answered with.
He wants straight porn to have gay and bisexual scenes. I have no idea if he insists that gay and bisexual porn have straight scenes however.
He believes that the lack of gay/bisexual scenes keeps porn from going mainstream, in spite of the lack of evidence that mainstream is open to gay/bisexual messages.
arthur, do buyers of gay or bisexual porn have a large interest in straight porn? Because forcing AVN to have its publications in one cover make those interested in the gay and bisexual sections purchase the whole thing.
How large must a publication be before it can be split up? Should car magazines also cover motorcycles?
arthur said:scipio replied:Think of it this way -- the academy awards segregates out animated films and foreign films, etc., for separate awards. And few people clamor for movies which mix real actors, animation, foreign languages, etc. That doesn't mean that people are animatiophobic or anything.
It's just marketing to different segments of viewers.
I'm curious, does this mean that the NAACP is racist? They have few hispanic members and those only because some have complained and pointed that out. I think there are few or no Asians. There award ceremonies are black and have no white, hispanic, native american, or asians.
What is your take on this arthur? Seperatism is segregation.
Wow... while I can say that there is a general undercurrent of homophobia in male talent in the straight industry (at least from what I've seen in Behind the Scenes stuff... especially with Barret Blade and Eric Masterson.) I really can't say that AVN moving GayVN stuff to another magazine is homophobic. Actually, I think it's good business. The two industries are pretty seperate as is, with only a few directors doing cross over stuff (like Chi Chi LaRue and Michael Zen). So, a seperate magazine would probably work. Plus, the gay industry is growing, and because of that, the material will need more space. Keeping it in AVN would probably hurt that.
And no, bi sexual and homosexual scenes really don't have a place in straight porn... since it is STRAIGHT porn. I wouldn't want to start seing straight scenes in gay porn. When I watch a gay movie, I expect to see guys fucking. When a guy watches a straight movie... I don't think he expects to see guys fucking! Porn, while it still can be an art form, really is also for enjoyment.
Come on guys, we have to stop being so sensitive. Not every little move is against us.
I fail to see why some guys just seem to dream of a day when all men in porn will be bi.
[Link]
arthur Deactivated User
165 Posts 9/04
Posted - Apr 4 2005 : 8:48PM
AVN is promoting segregation and marginalization of gay and bisexual men. Just like the straight porn industry itself. Of course, AVN has no problem with bisexual females being included in its "straight" magazine.
It's an absolute travesty that AVN is going down this path.
arthur, seriously. We're going in circles here. You've certainly made the only point you've started this thread to make. Everyone just repeating themselves is just a waste, isn't it?
Anyone have any other facets they'd like to bring to this discussion, or should we just let this dead horse rest in peace?
Edited by - MLyons on 4/4/2005 9:13:17 PM
[Link]
arthur Deactivated User
165 Posts 9/04
Posted - Apr 4 2005 : 9:16PM
MLyons,
The right word is "passion", not "obsession". Everything flows from passion, including things like the civil rights movement.
Oh, I also think it's wrong that I can't go into a five star restaurant and get chicken nuggest, french fries, and a little honey mustard sauce to dip it in. Or was that I was ticked off that I couldn't get a nice slab of prime rib at McDonalds? Regardless, it's all food discrimination!
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
[Link]
arthur Deactivated User
165 Posts 9/04
Posted - Apr 4 2005 : 9:43PM
Nothing compares to the fanaticism of the straight porn industry in avoiding the depiction of even a smidgeon of male-male. Religious aversion might be a good way of describing it.
My own attitude is open-minded. I am open-minded, I have always been open-minded, and I will always be open-minded.
If you are open minded, you certainly are not knowledgeable. You make no attempt to expand on your initial statement, one that you have used on many threads. You have no answer to legitamate points others have brought up except to repeat your initial statement. While passionate people are like this, so are obsessive or fanatical people - more so, in fact. In fact, other than believing young adults have no responsibility for their actions, you have said nothing else that I can recall.
Go ahead, change my opinion of you and actually try and answer what others have to say.
This is talking to a wall, but AVN promotes what the audience likes. Some, not all, straight porn viewers like women on women. That's the way the market is, that's the way they review. Having it will not change the opinions of straight men who don't like 'girl-girl' scenes. I would also go so far as to say people, men included, draw little of their societal expectations from porn. Porn is watched mainly to titallate, not to learn what is or is not acceptable.
No, you actually appear to be closed minded. You refuse to even acknowledge that any other opinion might exist let alone that your reasoning might be flawed. For you it is very black and white. If it is not your way, it is wrong, and more than that it is purposely done to segregate and separate you supposedly. If it is your way, it is right. This isn't having an open mind, this is having a closed mind. You don't even try to respond to answers, criticism or any other responses you get, you just repeat the same idea ad nauseam. These are the actions of a closed minded person.
I'll telling you all now this is some kid who just discovered he is gay and is finding it very difficult to adjust. I think we should all take it a bit easier on him. my suggestion to him personally would be to get into gay porn and prove us all wrong. but since I don't want gay porn I'd never know anyway
Yep, this thread is going nowhere fast. I could move it to WN&N, but we already have a Nonsense thread. So, while I know ya'll will be disappointed not to read arthur's carefully considered and crafted responses...