Hazel Heart Interview| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | ^ Courts haven't shown much interest in taking up the cause of copyright infringement be it pornography or otherwise. In order to peruse that, one needs to litigate the offending sites, and that isn't free. So if you aren't seeing that happen, see my response above to ^^ |
| whatsatelephonebill Senior Member 2935 Posts 10/11 | The DMCA, or more specifically the Safe Harbor provision of it, state that as long as the site properly responds to takedown notices, they aren't liable for what their users upload to the site. And if a company were to try to take a tube site to court, it would basically end up the same way as Viacom vs. YouTube did, unless they could prove somehow that it wasn't users but the site themselves uploading the content (which has been rumored, but never actually proven). The companies whose content you don't usually see on tube sites are just the companies that are really, really aggressive with their takedown notices. And even then it's not that the content isn't there, it's just that it's uploaded in a way that it isn't easy to find by search. |
| joachim Senior Member 03 12 15 16 18 04 07 13 18 2285 Posts 1/09 | |
| Mass Facialties Deactivated User "Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13 | |
| youngrphoto Senior Member 3539 Posts 3/14 | My guess is that this will get settled relatively quickly since MindGeek doesn't want to open their books to scrutiny by the Feds. Some voices are saying that MindGeek is a target for a money laundering-tax evasion investigation by the Feds, as well. |
| bass Member 39 Posts 1/16 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |