My point is, stop trying to overanalyze the situation, watch & be happy. If porn were meant to have chemistry, it would. But this isn't live sex between couples . If chemistry is had, it's not our job to find it, or analyze whether it's being had ~ that is just armchair reviewing, in a sense. Leave the chemistry to those people involved in the act, because as viewers, it doesn't concern us.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Oct 8 2006 : 9:33PM
It concerns you if you're interested in seeing a hot scene that rises above the general mediocrity of menu item sex and mechanical performers. There may not be a sure fire formula for creating chemistry, but it doesn't hurt for the director to try to create matchups and atmosphere where it's possible.
See we disagree in many areas. It is my job to find chemistry or try to find it when I watch films. Something I've been doing for years and actually enjoy doing. Not something that I need to do or necessarily do every time, but I love to see real chemistry, even if the sex isn't particularly that hot. Thing is, chemistry is one of the main things I see and hear brought up everywhere I go where porno films are even mentioned. It's not just me. It's something I hear women especially bring up about adult films. Some may be content with seeing their favorite star or starlet get down, but some of us expect more than that. I would never deny a guy his silly facials or fetishes, so why deny me the silly things I expect or at least prefer.
I didn't start this thread, but I think my statements fall in with what was expected. Nothing wrong with constructive criticism. Most directors and performers I've talked with, seem to actually appreciate it on many levels. Ultimately I believe the good far outweighs the bad, I really do, but this isn't that kind of thread.
Posted - Oct 8 2006 : 9:07PM