They are called "tunnel shots". Actually I don't mind a few tunnel shots ocassionally and I don't call them circus acts or circus positions as is the "reverse cowgirl" and many other positions. The tunnel shot is a rear view of my favorite position which is the missionary position because it give the girl the best chance to reach an organism and a scene is much more enjoyable when the girl is comfortable and having fun and not bent all to hell. Wayne In Dallas
Im with ramsey, why are you asking? do you like angel shots like this or are this something you don't like? Obviously, they shoot in this manner so you can see the woody go in and out of the pussy, properly....
Cowgirl is one thing but reverse cowgirl is something else. Never had a woman in the reverse cowgirl and why would one want to be unless they are in a bad porno movie or have the curtains open and giving the neighbors a good shot of your woman. Wayne In Dallas
Yeah, a PORN forum where you can't upload PORN images....
[Link]
Len801 Deactivated User
754 Posts 9/07
Posted - Nov 15 2009 : 2:02PM
Porn images and banners all over the place, but can't post porn pics. But it's OK to post the naughty stuff ELSEWHERE. Maybe we can draw stickfigures to get the meaning across.
^ Links work real well. As it is impossible for Steph and Drew to have 2257 paperwork for pictures posted on ADT, the only sane thing for them to do is practice the ADT Image Policy. On the IAFD, we're virtually non-nude, period. Non-nude = no records keeping 2257 bullshit. Which one of you would prefer losing ADT and/or IAFD to a government 2257 witch-hunt? Any volunteers for prision time? Being personally and financially destroyed defending yourself? The fact that we survive at all, probably does more to drive the anti-porn crusaders and government apparatchiks apoplectic, than the short-term pleasure of seeing a hard-core picture in our forums, anyway.
[Link]
Len801 Deactivated User
754 Posts 9/07
Posted - Nov 15 2009 : 5:22PM
I suppose as long as SOMEONE ELSE takes the risk (those you direct posters to) it's fine and dandy. Loss of ADT is preferable anyday. Porn lived without it very well before. Discussions went on the RAME newsgroup, and for quite some time IAFD administrators were set against setting up a discussion forum. What changed? RAME had no pics of any nature at all, and there was nowhere to post pics years back. All of a sudden we can't live without pics or discussion forums. When was the last time ADT was raided by the FBI asking for 2257 record keeping for all the porn material appearing there? When was the last time the FBI raided a well-known porn producer/distributor for record keeping verification (general, or specific to a particular performer?) If ADT does not want want to deal with the issue in its OWN back yard, then it should not be suggesting someone else take the risk. The simplest thing would be to say: no links, no picture postings PERIOD. Just written discussions like RAME used to be. ADT would not be sweating over 2257 regulations, the mods would not have to continusouly admonish posters over such policy. CNN and other networks blur pictures/videos of nude individuals. Do they get 2257 releases? News mags and other networks use racy pictures (which would not even qualify under ADT rules). Do they have 2257 releases? Really, it is because of the ADT icture posting policy that keeps its safe from government and public witch hunts? Wow! And the discussions of course are at the level of Shakespeare material and the pics of video box covers and banners show ancient Roman ruins?