Just starting to see scenes with condoms. I guess the new rules are in effect in Porn Valley? After watching a performer fuck au natural, I can't watch them with latex. Maybe for a girl I'd never seen before, condoms would be acceptable for a little while, but otherwise it's a boner killer. How come the companies aren't picking up and moving elsewhere?
My guess is they're gonna just try and see what happens. I doubt it's easy or cheap to move your base of operations in any kind of business. I do agree. It's just impossible to watch. There's nothing sexy about it.
There's an AssParade episode with Rachel Starr and Nikki Stone. Is BangBros going to condoms for all their product lines? I'm guessing they film some of their scenes in Florida and other states?
I've seen her in many bareback scenes. IIRC, I've even seen her get creampied. It's likely that many of those were with other production companies, but some must have been with BangBros. Just did a quick google image search. There have been Ass Parade scenes where she did bareback. Edited by - whitebootylover on 2/28/2012 6:14:24 PM
Not so bad with Bangbros. They are continue to shoot real porn without condoms. We can see even some more risky acts with real porn superheroines. Kagney Linn Karter is fucking all safe sex requirements. Bigtitcreampie
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Feb 29 2012 : 12:34AM
Bang Bros has used condoms since they started and they are one of the biggest companies in porn. It has nothing to do with the law in LA, since they're in Florida.
They haven't done it exclusively. You don't really believe their success is due to their use of rubbers do you? If every scene they'd ever done was rubbers, dental dams and various other barriers and no facial or oral cumshots, do you really believe they'd be as successful as they have been? BB success has more to do with how they've marketed themselves. I'm sure you know that. I doubt they'd have ever gotten angry complaint mails from their customers if they never used any rubbers. My guess is people just tolerated it. If I signed up with them, I'd take the scenes with no rubbers and leave everything else. That would still contribute to their success without making any comment on their use of rubbers in some scenes. But I'm sure all of the people who hate condom porn who ever paid these guys had no idea their contribution to this company would ever be twisted into an argument in favor of a governmental condom mandate. At any rate, I don't have any problems with companies that do it by choice. I'm not paying them for lousy porn with condoms that doesn't do anything for me but it's their business. My issue is with government forcing them to do it. Edited by - randomprecision on 2/29/2012 5:30:31 AM
People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11
Posted - Feb 29 2012 : 2:17PM
I can tolerate condoms ONLY if it is a true amateur title. It really saves time and money not to have to screen the performers so I see why directors take this path. I'm not sure whether the condom police are intimidating studios. If you think there is too much regulation going on just you wait and see what happens if Obama is re-elected. The government is sticking its nose into every aspect of American society, into every institution in American society. And don't think for a minute they were not involved in the affairs that go on in the State of California, into every local issue, they own California.
I myself cannot tolerate condoms. I just came across Savanna Samson. She is contracted with Vivid and does alot of anal so i only have three movies to choose from with her to not getting anal, then the issue with CONDOMS. I will not buy , rent, VOD anything with condoms.The movie "SweetHearts" she is in i am thinking about getting but I have examined the back of the boxes to try to see if condoms are in this one, cannot figure it out. Read the reviews, no mention of it. $10.00 for that movie, I'll take a shot at a fanatasy.
This has never been an issue with me. As long as the guy isn't wearing a condom during oral sex. That's just insanity. I'm definitely just as turned on watching a scene with or without condom use.
If we talk about amateur porn, I can recommend russian amateur videos. This is very interesting. For example some time ago I watched Dadsandbabe. Most of their videos (only some exceptions) are filmed without condoms. I searched information about this crazy stuff because of not using condoms. This is not a confirmed information, but my friends explained for me that mostly just a HIV test is necessary for filming. Their amateurs are not doing full panel tests like US professionals. Sometimes they are just using "Miramistin" and other antiseptics for prevention of infections. Nevertheless a lot of performers agrees to take the risk and to fuck bareback. Dadsandbabe was crazy stuff. I remember girl Polina. She worked without condoms in all videos. Real risk, real unprotected sex with many partners. Many other girls did the same. My friends said that the main motivation - money and entertainment. However, this is amateur porn.
People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11
Posted - Feb 29 2012 : 7:02PM
Any testing is better than no testing of course. The thing with the HIV tests is it takes a minimum of 6 weeks for the antibodies to develop which is what the HIV test detects to determine whether someone is HIV positive. So, in effect, you could be infected from someone 5 weeks earlier and take the HIV test and pass. 99% of infected people will show an HIV positive result 3 months after infection.
Seems to me most of the Russian professional porn does not use condoms, even for anal. Anal Teen Angels and Try Teen and all those similar series I've seen are bareback.
LOL. I have seen MANY BangBros bareback scenes. Someone even linked to a BB bareback scene prior to your post. Yes, some of their scenes use condoms, but they did not get to be one of the biggest companies in porn because they use condoms, or even in spite of their use of condoms, because they have plenty of bareback product. In fact, if they went 100% covered, I'd bet they go out of business.
The thing is that if they're only wearing rubbers for intercourse and they're doing blowjobs, ass licking and pussy munching with no barriers, they're still wide open to quite a few STDs, which was the stated reason for this to start with. So if they're really serious, I expect they will start harping on barriers for all contact. Not just intercourse. Of course, I think the real motive was something else entirely but as long as they can plausibly cause more damage with the same excuse, they probably will.
My guess is the main reason for this inconsistency is that they gave their performers a choice on condom use. Which is how it should have been if anyone really wanted to advocate for increased safety.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Mar 1 2012 : 2:07AM
All their early scenes had condoms, it probably has to do with using newbies to porn in a lot of their initial scenes and a lack of testing infrastructure in Florida.
[Link]
ral b Deactivated User
530 Posts 1/08
Posted - Mar 1 2012 : 12:47PM
I have noticed that whenever a black girl is getting fucked on bangbros by a white guy, they all seem to suddenly prefer using rubbers. Pair the guy with a white girl the next week and it's bareback all the way. Hmmmmmmmm......
[Link]
ral b Deactivated User
530 Posts 1/08
Posted - Mar 1 2012 : 12:52PM
Check out the latest Jada Fire scene on Bangbros big tits, round asses. In fact all the bangbros csenes with Jada are with condoms.. The scenes with Nikki Stone is another pointer. I love bangbros but i have to speak out on their double standards.
Actually, I believe Savanna Samson is no longer contracted with Vivid and has basically retired. Vivid dropped their condoms-only policy years ago. I think she may have done more than 3 bare-back anal scenes also, although I'm not 100% sure. Doesn't sound right though.
Condoms look ridiculous in porn because the first priority is showing penetration instead of passion and intimacy. That's mostly why I stopped watching b/g fucking years ago. If the condom rule is enforced, that would ruin blowjob scenes, but even without condoms they're mostly crap anyway.
Has Bangbros gone mostly condom-only?? It seems like for the past 4-5 months 80-90% of their scenes are condom-only. Bummer. Needless to say, I've canceled my subscription. Just wondering if anyone has any insight as to what drove this change.
People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11
Posted - Apr 23 2012 : 3:18PM
I don't know specifically about Bangbros but if you scroll through the threads posted over the past few months there are several on the condom police in LA. Legislation passed is putting pressure on the adult industry to use condoms. It seems there is more and more micromanaging these days by legislators who intrude in areas that is none of their business.
I think this is a good way, how we can fight against condoms in porn. LA is not the only place in a world, where studios can shoot. It is very easy to say - I accept condoms in porn. What about to pay money for it? I have not any friend who would pay real money for safe sex videos. None!
^^ Well the crazy thing is that most of the shooting Bangbros does is in Florida, so the recent condom ordinance shouldn't affect their shooting there at all.
California votes Yes :( It's a terrible news, though amid the recent syphilis crisis, it was almost expected that voters would vote for it. This is taken as a serious blow, rightly so, by the porn industry. "The effect would be simply to have no scenes, or much, much fewer scenes shot in Los Angeles,' John Stagliano , also known as 'Buttman' who owns Evil Angel , one of the nation's top porn production companies, told Buzz Feed before the measure’s passing." With the measure's passing Mr Stagliano said he expects some scenes to go underground while he personally expects 'to just shoot in other places.' I really hope production goes somewhere else, in other states, where it's still allowed to shoot porn as we like it. Porn watchers prefer scenes with NO condoms and will surely start looking for alternatives, mostly from the eastern countries (Czech, Hungary ...etc), if ever US porn industry starts complying with this regulation. Read the full article: The Condom Vote What's your views?
In the article, it is said: 55.9 per cent voted for condoms' use in all porn films made in Los Angeles. Now, with a subtle mockery on my mind, I would like to ask the author of this decision: - does that mean that in all girl/girl films all the girls should insert female condom to 'protect' themselves? Second, if "all films" means boy/girl scenes, then we don't need cumshot/ejaculation scenes anymore - I mean, what's the point shooting cum into that rubber thing and then throw it away? And that leaves us with what? - shooting a face of a guy who shots cum? Another question: why not prescribe that all performers should wear not only condoms, but they should be dressed (head to toe) into latex to prevent any direct contact of the bodies.
Posted - Feb 28 2012 : 1:54PM
However, this is amateur porn.
