Reviewers Recommend
Best of Forbidden Scenes 27, TheBest of Forbidden Scenes 27, The - review by Captain Jack
Starring: Steve Holmes, Tommy Pistol, Donny Sins, Violet Starr, Avi Love, Riley Star, Jane Wilde, Dante Colle, Paige Owens, Zac Wild, Jay Romero. Read review
All Forums > The Feature Side > The Feature Side Forum Page 22 > Digital Playground...Like or Dislike > Digital Playground...Like or Dislike (page 2)
Page 2 of 5 First 2 3 4 > Last
AuthorPost
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - Mar 9 2013 : 2:45PM
I just watched 'the girlfriend exchange'. there is nothing more frustrating in porn than knowing there is hot sex happening but the camera is not anywhere near focusing on it or accentuating it in any way. In Chastity Lynn's scene the camera was literally on her shins for what seemed like an entire minute. you could HEAR that what was happening was good sex, but all you saw were her feet/shins. And in Jada/Chastity's bgg the same thing happened! You could HEAR Chastity/Jada making out and fingering each other, but all you saw was their thighs and then the camera literally focused on the wall for a few seconds...a white wall.
It seems like the camera work at DP i just getting worse and worse. Or maybe it's the editing, idk. Surely the camera captures better shots than the ones that end up in the final product.
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Mar 11 2013 : 4:08PM
If you think the B/G/G scene in that was bad, watch the orgy at the end of 'code of honor'. What's the point of having all these fabulous looking girls in one scene and they only thing you get to see is Manuels dick. It only highlights my point about DP's un-willingness to indulge in G/G.
Cody McLarge
Senior Member

2668 Posts
8/10
Posted - Mar 11 2013 : 7:31PM
^I don't agree with that last part. I thought the reverse gang bangs from Babysitters 2 and Nurses 2 focused on Manuel way more than the COH attempt. At least that was confined to one table. In Babysitters 2, the sex was all on four couches and the camera was jumping all over.
OLJ
Member

108 Posts
10/12
Posted - Mar 12 2013 : 6:57PM
That camera panning is what I can't figure out. DP is shooting RED 4k cameras, so for a blu-ray release they can either down-scale the full-frame shot to 1080 or pan-and-scan within the full-frame. If it's the first, why on earth are they shooting a close-up of a girl's shin? We're buying hardcore, if we wanted Skinemax we would be buying Skinemax. If it's the second, what are they scanning away from? An earlier poster mentioned that DP limits some on-screen activity so as not to anger the credit card companies, but based on the rest of the scene, I doubt if the performers are having a 6 second fisting break during the middle of filming.
It's frustrating when they have the most attractive girls and then don't leave the camera on them.
 
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Mar 20 2013 : 3:38PM
Yes it was confined to one table but you still can't see anything of what the girls are doing to each other and that makes it all the more criminal. I borrowed it off a friend and i've watched it 3 times now just to see if i might have overlooked the odd 'blink and you miss it' finger prod or tongue jab, but nope it's still the same.
The most inept orgy scene ever by the most inept director ever.
Sorry if people don't agree with that last comment, but that's my view on it.
Quorrl
Senior Member

2835 Posts
3/11
Posted - Mar 20 2013 : 6:13PM

^ Whether they agree with your view or not: the problem is they just heard them too often.
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Mar 21 2013 : 1:52PM
You're right and my guess is that unless Mr 'D' does something different that's gonna warrant a more positive view, they'll keep on hearing it.
JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12
Posted - Mar 23 2013 : 5:53AM
I have to agree with the general dissatisfaction being expressed in this thread. At this point, I'm pretty much done buying DP movies until they make a change. DP has the hottest girls in the industry, and pairs them with the best male performers, but the scenes they produce seem to waste that. Instead of shooting the performers just having sex, they focus on random closeups of penetration, and sometimes, not even that, just random body parts. The sex scenes are often too short, and way over-edited, to the point where it's distracting.
I get that they cater to a certain demographic, but I don't think that excuses the consistent failure to capture a decent sex scene. Other feature companies do it routinely, and they aren't working with anything close to the talent DP uses.
The romantic comedy themed movies, which for some reason feature the male performers instead of their contract girls, are so stale that I FF anything between the sex scenes. It wouldn't be so bad if they ever shot anything else.
What really kills me though, is that you'd almost have to be trying to screw up shooting a scene with Stoya and James Deen, or Kayden Kross and Manuel Ferrara, but DP has pulled it off so many times that I've given up. Kayden is my absolute favorite performer in the industry, but I didn't buy Kayden's last two movies or Code of Honor, and unless DP tries something new, I don't see that changing.
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Apr 1 2013 : 11:09AM
DP aren't going to change because nobody over there seems to give a shit about what fans think. If they did then Cherry 3 would've happened by now. The last time anyone at DP had an idea about branching out and adding something different to the formulaic couples only boy/girl stuff they were stabbed in the back and fired.
Mothers and daughters (49 movies and 13 months ago) was the last time a DP movie had something different in it that wasn't B/G. That's right, it had that rarest of commodities in a DP movie in it. Wait for it.....A G/G scene!!!!.
If they had carried on with that approach, doing more G/G scenes, then yeah I suppose you could say that they are doing something different, but they haven't and I'll wager that you won't see another G/G scene in a DP movie again, ever.
Gore Gore Girl All-Star Supporter
Doctor of the Erotic Arts

7238 Posts
1/09
Posted - Apr 1 2013 : 1:10PM
This is one thing I like about those movies. That should give you a clue as to why they do it.
Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11018 Posts
5/01
Posted - Apr 1 2013 : 10:24PM
Okay, everyone understands that you are seriously upset over no Cherries 3. But repeating it isn't contributing to the thread and its becoming obsessive.
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Apr 2 2013 : 3:14PM
I don't mean to be repetitive, but it bugs the hell out of me that they just left what could have been a great story hanging with no ending. So I guess I'm holding on to the faint hope that there might still be a third.
Edited by - lezlover on 4/2/2013 3:16:07 PM
JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12
Posted - Apr 8 2013 : 3:07AM
It does. That's wayyyyy down my list of DP grievances, though. I wish they would shoot the occasional vignette or gonzo style movie. They used to do it fairly regularly, and they always yielded my favorite scenes. Admittedly, I was a little bit too critical with my last post, but I still won't give DP my money until they figure out how to shoot a decent sex scene in their features. Nothing I've seen from them recently indicates that they have, though.
Gore Gore Girl All-Star Supporter
Doctor of the Erotic Arts

7238 Posts
1/09
Posted - Apr 8 2013 : 9:40AM
^ I have gripes about DP. Primarily, I don't trust that their "features" are actually features at all. I always check with other people to see how integrated the sex/narrative is (it usually isn't) and in turn how much traditional narrative there is in between the unintegrated sex scenes (there tends to be very little). I felt pretty cheated by FIGHTERS and I think that's the last one I attempted to watch. A real shame imo, as they seem to have talented people working there. I think it's a case of falling victim to attempting to please two disparate audiences.
 
Quorrl
Senior Member

2835 Posts
3/11
Posted - Apr 8 2013 : 5:25PM
Indeed... and "Fighters" is IMHO actually an example where the narrative elements are fitting and numerous enough to be called a feature correctly. If you felt cheated by that, then a number of other DP titles indeed are even less examples of that integration of sex and narration.
Probably that's the main reason.
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - Apr 11 2013 : 11:58AM
I just got 'watch over me' the new Stoya movie, and I have to say I was pleased to see some improvement in the camera work. Not NEARLY as many close-ups. So, some positive feedback :) really liked both of Stoya's scenes in this one, and the plot wasn't bad either.
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - Apr 11 2013 : 5:52PM
Which "fans"? I try to listen to what people have to say, good or bad, as long as they don't go on ranting tangents.
No one since I have been here, aside from you, has ever asked for it.
? Where do you come up with this stuff?
I'll take that bet.
https://twitter.com/Skin_Diamond/status/322463088819466240
Social Media MonstarPR Digital Playground
Edited by - Monstar on 4/11/2013 5:52:58 PM
PornStarNamedBuckNaked All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sometimes life is goofier than a monkey on ether
12073 Posts
7/10
Posted - Apr 11 2013 : 10:27PM
The whole problem at DP is Robby D. Plain and simple. If there is another major studio who only uses one director let me know but I can't think of one.
They are wasting some seriously hot girls at DP.
Also, in the Lily Carter thread someone linked to a trailer for "Don't Fuck My Sister" and they didn't even spell Lily's name right in the trailer! Lily fucking Carter and they couldn't spell her name correctly!! I call that movie a "A Robby D. Misspelling".
They don't care and it shows.
Myload
Senior Member

A rose is what you are to me
2069 Posts
6/03
Posted - Apr 11 2013 : 11:20PM
I also have the impression their movies don't have much in the way of plot. That's the most important part of a feature. None of their movies have appealed to me because they seem to lack in this area.
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Apr 12 2013 : 2:10PM
mike23
Member

509 Posts
7/12
Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 10:42PM
Sounds like DP might release a gonzo title in May jack attack 1' w/Riley Steele... I'll wait for a trailer or boxcover before I get too excited though.
PornStarNamedBuckNaked All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sometimes life is goofier than a monkey on ether
12073 Posts
7/10
Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 10:51PM
^ I wouldn't be surprised if it's nothing more then a scene compilation DVD.
And if it's not and it's like the other "Jack" DVD's it'll be the DP version of "gonzo". Which isn't gonzo at all.
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 12:12PM
^It's not a compilation. All news scenes starring:
Bridgette B.
Natalia Starr
Christy Mack
Rikki Six
Riley Steele
Social Media: MonstarPR (Personal) Digital Playground
Edited by - Monstar on 4/25/2013 12:14:17 PM
PornStarNamedBuckNaked All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sometimes life is goofier than a monkey on ether
12073 Posts
7/10
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 1:06PM
^ See, this is what frustrates the hell out of me about DP. Normally that would be a GREAT cast but I know since Robby D. is the director that it's going to be poorly shot and boring.
DP: if you don't want to get rid of Robby D. at least THINK ABOUT hiring another director to go with him. Jeez.
 
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 2:33PM
Monstar, do you know who Riley's scene is with in this 'jack attack' movie?
OLJ
Member

108 Posts
10/12
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 3:35PM
Good cast, I'm interested. But now no BiBi movie in May? https://twitter.com/DPxxx/status/322468068825653248
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 5:49PM
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - Apr 25 2013 : 5:50PM
There was a shuffle in scheduling. Community Sex starring BiBi and Kayden has been moved to June 11th.
Social Media: MonstarPR (Personal) Digital Playground
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - Apr 26 2013 : 1:21PM
A great idea. Someone with a fresh approach. Maybe DP wouldn't get so much stick if they did.
Incidentally Jake Westwood did Jailhouse Heat back in 2011, but he seems to have disappeared without a trace.
JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12
Posted - Apr 27 2013 : 6:57PM
I think the scenes in DP's gonzo style movies have been shot pretty well actually. I'm glad they're bringing it back. I have several volumes of Jack's POV and Powerfuck, and watch some of the scenes in them fairly regularly. BiBi Jones' scene with Manuel Ferrara in Jack's POV is still a favorite of mine.
Danger Josh
Member

I've been in the Danger Zone!
385 Posts
4/13
Posted - Apr 27 2013 : 11:00PM
The only movie that i have from DP is "Contract Star" from 2004, long time ago. I don't know if anyone ever saw or know about the movie, but i though it was good.
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - Apr 30 2013 : 6:55PM
I'm wondering why there are no longer trailers available on the press site? I never buy DVD's without checking out the trailer first and I'd like to see if I wanna purchase any upcoming DP movies.
pringles All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1351 Posts
2/08
Posted - Apr 30 2013 : 9:52PM

Edited by - pringles on 4/30/2013 10:00:16 PM
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - May 1 2013 : 1:21PM
 
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - May 1 2013 : 3:15PM
I meant trailers for upcoming releases, those are all movies that have been released already.
Monstar
Senior Member

http://twitter.com/MonstarPR
1154 Posts
4/04
Posted - May 1 2013 : 7:01PM
^I mentioned this is in another thread, but the back end is being changed so that we can get them up faster. It used to be we'd have them up weeks out of a movies release, but if we can get them up sooner, now, we will.
So, next weeks release will be up same date as release, but after that they should start coming more frequently.
I was just confused by the way you phrased it in your post "I'm wondering why there are no longer trailers available on the press site?"
Social Media: MonstarPR (Personal) Digital Playground
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - May 1 2013 : 7:07PM
ok that makes sense, thanks :)
bukkake79
Member

129 Posts
6/11
Posted - May 3 2013 : 10:21AM
I agree. The girls are hot and are typically contract-based. Often the A-list of pornstars, the type you see in the mainstream media (like Stoya, Sasha Grey, Jenna Jameson etc.). However, if you like your porn somewhat rougher, look elsewhere. DP does some energetic one-on-one sex, but they rarely feature more than one guy to a girl. A girlfriend friendly label.
Corran7
Deactivated User

300 Posts
1/12
Posted - May 11 2013 : 10:27PM
Manuel in every movie. Pass. He's way over exposed. Bad camera angles in every movie. Pass. Even though Jesse and Stoya are two of the hottest girls in porn, I'm not going to part with my hard earned money to watch close ups of their stomachs or the guys face throughout the entire scene. Robby D directing every movie. EPIC pass!
michellec85
Member

140 Posts
5/12
Posted - May 16 2013 : 11:43AM
Monstar, if you read this, any update on when trailers for upcoming releases will be available? And what about 'Bridesmaids' is there a boxcover or trailer for that up anywhere yet? Thanks :)
OLJ
Member

108 Posts
10/12
Posted - May 16 2013 : 12:34PM
Yeah, I'm a DP fan, but this lack of trailers pretty much ensures a "no-buy" from me. Their last new trailer was uploaded almost a month ago -- after having a fairly continual stream of weekly uploads reaching back to July 2003.
mr_sphinx
Member

117 Posts
10/08
Posted - May 17 2013 : 2:06AM
I was browsing DP Blu-rays, and I was shocked to see that DP has actually released a couple of BD-50 titles. One is Pirates II (2008), which appears to have over 300 minutes of content on one BD-50, but the other is Teachers (2009). It is actually marked "Dual Layer Disc" on the back cover (as is Pirates II). Indeed, on my HDTV, it looks fantastic, even if it's not the best-shot DP film ever, the technical quality is astounding to see in playback:

Total Video
Title Codec Length Movie Size Disc Size Bitrate Bitrate Main Audio Track Secondary Audio Track
----- ------ ------- -------------- -------------- ------- ------- ------------------ ---------------------
00002.MPLS AVC 3:06:31 37,259,065,344 43,998,266,278 26.63 24.99 DD AC3 5.1 448Kbps
[/code]

DISC INFO:
Disc Title: TEACHERS BD
Disc Size: 43,998,266,278 bytes
Protection: AACS
BD-Java: No
BDInfo: 0.5.8
PLAYLIST REPORT:
Name: 00002.MPLS
Length: 3:06:31.805 (h:m:s.ms)
Size: 37,259,065,344 bytes
Total Bitrate: 26.63 Mbps
VIDEO:
Codec Bitrate Description
----- ------- -----------
MPEG-4 AVC Video 24993 kbps 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1
AUDIO:
Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
Dolby Digital Audio English 448 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 448 kbps / DN -4dB
FILES:
Name Time In Length Size Total Bitrate
---- ------- ------ ---- -------------
00002.M2TS 0:00:00.000 3:06:31.805 37,259,065,344 26,633
CHAPTERS:
Number Time In Length Avg Video Rate Max 1-Sec Rate Max 1-Sec Time Max 5-Sec Rate Max 5-Sec Time Max 10Sec Rate Max 10Sec Time Avg Frame Size Max Frame Size Max Frame Time
------ ------- ------ -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1 0:00:00.000 0:01:20.163 25,047 kbps 37,457 kbps 00:00:33.366 34,015 kbps 00:00:32.574 31,254 kbps 00:00:28.278 130,513 bytes 481,780 bytes 00:00:21.354
2 0:01:20.163 0:04:25.848 23,309 kbps 36,049 kbps 00:02:40.326 31,538 kbps 00:03:16.237 28,978 kbps 00:02:31.568 121,523 bytes 413,596 bytes 00:02:07.293
3 0:05:46.012 0:07:32.660 23,140 kbps 36,772 kbps 00:06:07.992 32,004 kbps 00:10:14.697 29,280 kbps 00:12:30.916 120,641 bytes 387,195 bytes 00:05:50.850
4 0:13:18.672 0:08:02.815 25,815 kbps 35,060 kbps 00:16:52.386 31,900 kbps 00:16:49.800 30,357 kbps 00:16:48.632 134,589 bytes 401,742 bytes 00:21:21.363
5 0:21:21.488 0:09:25.940 24,889 kbps 34,550 kbps 00:27:26.603 32,049 kbps 00:27:23.892 30,330 kbps 00:27:23.892 129,759 bytes 404,423 bytes 00:21:29.371
6 0:30:47.428 0:14:13.227 25,332 kbps 37,081 kbps 00:41:46.712 33,895 kbps 00:40:11.534 32,411 kbps 00:40:06.570 132,068 bytes 408,162 bytes 00:41:42.791
7 0:45:00.656 0:12:16.652 22,390 kbps 37,592 kbps 00:55:56.603 34,446 kbps 00:55:55.935 32,199 kbps 00:55:50.972 116,733 bytes 351,620 bytes 00:45:07.996
8 0:57:17.308 0:14:52.892 23,315 kbps 36,037 kbps 00:57:40.290 33,397 kbps 00:57:39.080 31,218 kbps 01:01:04.535 121,552 bytes 394,590 bytes 01:12:10.075
9 1:12:10.200 0:19:27.291 25,358 kbps 38,970 kbps 01:31:19.098 32,683 kbps 01:31:17.263 30,846 kbps 01:19:17.002 132,206 bytes 401,200 bytes 01:12:11.076
10 1:31:37.492 0:12:01.220 26,391 kbps 37,498 kbps 01:42:01.532 33,131 kbps 01:37:15.996 29,980 kbps 01:35:35.229 137,591 bytes 378,053 bytes 01:35:40.735
11 1:43:38.712 0:10:45.269 23,095 kbps 36,923 kbps 01:49:58.675 32,037 kbps 01:50:46.097 30,376 kbps 01:50:45.138 120,406 bytes 367,843 bytes 01:43:41.006
12 1:54:23.982 0:14:11.016 25,533 kbps 36,551 kbps 02:03:58.806 33,312 kbps 02:03:55.302 31,757 kbps 02:03:50.131 133,116 bytes 347,324 bytes 02:05:59.051
13 2:08:34.998 0:06:17.668 26,560 kbps 35,444 kbps 02:08:35.332 31,746 kbps 02:14:15.589 30,535 kbps 02:14:14.546 138,469 bytes 417,346 bytes 02:14:05.704
14 2:14:52.667 0:13:59.880 25,004 kbps 36,238 kbps 02:16:40.191 32,339 kbps 02:22:02.514 30,981 kbps 02:22:01.095 130,357 bytes 418,799 bytes 02:27:23.084
15 2:28:52.548 0:05:37.295 27,124 kbps 35,265 kbps 02:30:00.282 32,013 kbps 02:30:02.576 31,396 kbps 02:29:57.196 141,410 bytes 382,155 bytes 02:29:52.441
16 2:34:29.843 0:10:43.851 27,163 kbps 33,136 kbps 02:42:59.978 30,191 kbps 02:42:59.352 29,745 kbps 02:42:59.352 141,616 bytes 373,141 bytes 02:44:26.147
17 2:45:13.695 0:06:46.239 26,848 kbps 37,611 kbps 02:45:39.596 31,677 kbps 02:45:38.511 30,357 kbps 02:45:38.511 139,972 bytes 405,068 bytes 02:45:40.013
18 2:51:59.934 0:12:57.151 26,587 kbps 38,087 kbps 02:56:21.487 32,388 kbps 02:58:19.563 29,809 kbps 02:54:01.514 138,610 bytes 411,610 bytes 02:52:07.150
19 3:04:57.086 0:01:34.719 11,241 kbps 39,231 kbps 03:06:13.662 35,341 kbps 03:06:11.743 31,005 kbps 03:06:09.116 58,630 bytes 401,673 bytes 03:05:02.091
STREAM DIAGNOSTICS:
File PID Type Codec Language Seconds Bitrate Bytes Packets
---- --- ---- ----- -------- -------------- -------------- ------------- -----
00002.M2TS 4113 ( hex 1011) hex 1B AVC 11191.681 24,994 34,965,081,051 190,185,231
00002.M2TS 4352 ( hex 1100) hex 81 AC3 eng (English) 11191.681 448 626,743,040 3,497,450
[/code]

And yet, more recently, Mothers and Daughters (2011), which is 156 minutes and has more extras than Teachers (not to mention higher bitrate Dolby Digital sound and subtitles, which it must be said, account for little space), is squeezed onto a BD-25--notice how the bit rate takes a huge dive, and at that level, there would be (and is) a distinct drop in picture quality, despite this movie being two years newer:

Total Video
Title Codec Length Movie Size Disc Size Bitrate Bitrate Main Audio Track Secondary Audio Track
----- ------ ------- -------------- -------------- ------- ------- ------------------ ---------------------
00002.MPLS AVC 2:36:04 18,046,507,008 23,281,409,900 15.42 13.98 DD AC3 5.1 640Kbps
[/code]

DISC INFO:
Disc Title: MOTHERS AND DAUGHTERS
Disc Size: 23,281,409,900 bytes
Protection: AACS
BD-Java: No
BDInfo: 0.5.8
PLAYLIST REPORT:
Name: 00002.MPLS
Length: 2:36:04.897 (h:m:s.ms)
Size: 18,046,507,008 bytes
Total Bitrate: 15.42 Mbps
VIDEO:
Codec Bitrate Description
----- ------- -----------
MPEG-4 AVC Video 13983 kbps 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1
AUDIO:
Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
Dolby Digital Audio English 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps / DN -4dB
SUBTITLES:
Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
Presentation Graphics French 10.035 kbps
Presentation Graphics German 10.183 kbps
Presentation Graphics Spanish 8.974 kbps
FILES:
Name Time In Length Size Total Bitrate
---- ------- ------ ---- -------------
00002.M2TS 0:00:00.000 2:36:04.688 18,046,500,864 15,417
00023.M2TS 2:36:04.688 0:00:00.208 6,144 236
CHAPTERS:
Number Time In Length Avg Video Rate Max 1-Sec Rate Max 1-Sec Time Max 5-Sec Rate Max 5-Sec Time Max 10Sec Rate Max 10Sec Time Avg Frame Size Max Frame Size Max Frame Time
------ ------- ------ -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1 0:00:00.000 0:02:52.463 13,395 kbps 17,493 kbps 00:01:12.864 16,081 kbps 00:01:12.822 15,261 kbps 00:01:12.822 69,817 bytes 338,909 bytes 00:01:59.994
2 0:02:52.463 0:09:23.104 14,198 kbps 22,569 kbps 00:08:48.361 19,645 kbps 00:08:45.191 18,503 kbps 00:08:41.103 74,020 bytes 297,636 bytes 00:05:22.280
3 0:12:15.568 0:05:22.071 11,671 kbps 18,527 kbps 00:15:28.385 15,637 kbps 00:12:26.287 14,109 kbps 00:14:08.305 60,848 bytes 363,106 bytes 00:15:24.131
4 0:17:37.639 0:07:47.175 11,917 kbps 24,234 kbps 00:22:58.418 16,539 kbps 00:21:46.847 15,880 kbps 00:21:58.734 62,129 bytes 372,793 bytes 00:19:45.475
5 0:25:24.814 0:14:44.466 13,685 kbps 24,127 kbps 00:34:03.958 18,844 kbps 00:34:00.204 17,516 kbps 00:29:07.412 71,348 bytes 290,629 bytes 00:25:25.774
6 0:40:09.281 0:10:24.624 14,062 kbps 21,472 kbps 00:50:17.556 19,661 kbps 00:50:14.052 19,382 kbps 00:50:09.047 73,313 bytes 382,223 bytes 00:49:31.677
7 0:50:33.905 0:13:46.534 14,775 kbps 24,581 kbps 01:04:13.891 20,742 kbps 01:04:10.805 20,214 kbps 01:02:54.687 77,031 bytes 367,394 bytes 00:53:19.362
8 1:04:20.439 0:08:34.472 13,515 kbps 23,143 kbps 01:07:41.390 21,307 kbps 01:07:37.928 20,012 kbps 01:07:36.510 70,459 bytes 347,017 bytes 01:11:06.262
9 1:12:54.912 0:08:41.979 15,238 kbps 23,166 kbps 01:20:24.778 20,096 kbps 01:20:23.109 19,086 kbps 01:20:44.172 79,444 bytes 395,324 bytes 01:20:23.151
10 1:21:36.892 0:04:55.169 15,599 kbps 21,650 kbps 01:23:28.712 19,067 kbps 01:23:26.376 18,150 kbps 01:23:25.750 81,326 bytes 264,490 bytes 01:23:13.697
11 1:26:32.061 0:06:08.326 14,900 kbps 22,448 kbps 01:28:56.831 19,977 kbps 01:28:53.745 18,727 kbps 01:28:52.493 77,681 bytes 349,797 bytes 01:32:38.636
12 1:32:40.388 0:06:00.401 16,290 kbps 23,097 kbps 01:34:34.168 20,248 kbps 01:34:31.999 19,649 kbps 01:36:56.352 84,926 bytes 364,446 bytes 01:34:32.041
13 1:38:40.789 0:12:51.312 16,161 kbps 24,022 kbps 01:45:46.757 22,438 kbps 01:45:45.297 21,732 kbps 01:45:44.880 84,255 bytes 413,195 bytes 01:51:14.125
14 1:51:32.102 0:04:45.868 17,268 kbps 25,478 kbps 01:53:14.913 24,192 kbps 01:53:13.828 22,324 kbps 01:53:09.699 90,027 bytes 301,550 bytes 01:51:54.332
15 1:56:17.971 0:04:15.838 11,721 kbps 20,633 kbps 01:56:38.449 19,106 kbps 01:56:28.981 18,133 kbps 01:56:24.310 61,106 bytes 236,225 bytes 01:58:34.023
16 2:00:33.809 0:07:48.926 14,220 kbps 22,765 kbps 02:04:18.284 19,286 kbps 02:00:49.617 18,736 kbps 02:00:48.032 74,135 bytes 357,959 bytes 02:08:20.943
17 2:08:22.736 0:06:52.495 11,213 kbps 23,290 kbps 02:14:48.455 19,420 kbps 02:14:48.497 17,969 kbps 02:14:48.413 58,461 bytes 320,709 bytes 02:08:22.945
18 2:15:15.232 0:16:39.164 13,653 kbps 21,325 kbps 02:23:09.289 18,032 kbps 02:27:06.275 17,524 kbps 02:27:01.979 71,182 bytes 306,462 bytes 02:20:04.979
19 2:31:54.396 0:04:10.500 8,047 kbps 19,654 kbps 02:34:04.610 16,382 kbps 02:34:15.579 15,208 kbps 02:33:57.770 41,959 bytes 430,977 bytes 02:34:26.298
STREAM DIAGNOSTICS:
File PID Type Codec Language Seconds Bitrate Bytes Packets
---- --- ---- ----- -------- -------------- -------------- ------------- -----
00002.M2TS 4113 ( hex 1011) hex 1B AVC 9364.522 13,984 16,368,965,753 89,093,657
00002.M2TS 4352 ( hex 1100) hex 81 AC3 eng (English) 9364.522 640 749,176,320 4,389,705
00002.M2TS 4608 ( hex 1200) hex 90 PGS fra (French) 9364.522 10 11,747,373 66,970
00002.M2TS 4609 ( hex 1201) hex 90 PGS deu (German) 9364.522 10 11,920,677 67,897
00002.M2TS 4610 ( hex 1202) hex 90 PGS spa (Spanish) 9364.522 9 10,504,690 60,228
00023.M2TS 4113 ( hex 1011) hex 1B AVC 0.125 235 3,679 22
[/code]

Up until now, everything I have seen from DP is on BD-25 media (including Nurses (2009), which is 195 minutes, and Nurses 2 (2012), is not marked as Dual Layer, despite being 180 minutes), and when Graham from Elegant Angel explained to me recently that BD-50s were not accessible to them, I figured it was the same for all porn companies in the USA--I mean, most labels seem to use two BD-25s instead of one BD-50, and they have to know that shoving all that content onto a single-layer disc can be disastrous for the PQ, and I would think that this is one of the reasons that some people don't buy adult Blu-rays, because if compression is so bad, the PQ isn't going to have the stuff to impress consumers. Really, anything over two hours really needs to be on a BD-50 disc, in order to get the best from the Blu-ray format.
So, bearing this in mind, have DP released any other titles on BD-50 discs besides Teachers and Pirates II?
Edited by - mr_sphinx on 5/17/2013 2:14:02 AM

JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12
Posted - May 20 2013 : 3:25AM
I've been holding out on DP titles for a while now for unrelated reasons, but their inability to get boxcovers/trailers out to consumers is ridiculous. They used to be the absolute best at it. Releasing trailers 4 movies ahead of street date, plus free BTS. I've been a DP supporter over the years, but now, for a supposed top porn company, they really need to get their shit together.
Cody McLarge
Senior Member

2668 Posts
8/10
Posted - May 20 2013 : 3:31AM
I'm also a fairly loyal DP customer but the lack of trailers is the final straw. First, my personal information was released in a cyber attack. Then the website got rid of its monthly rental option. Now DP won't even release trailers ahead of time. That is it - you've lost me. Dislike.
JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12
Posted - May 20 2013 : 3:55AM
Well now that you mentioned it... The website thing was my first point of contention with DP. I actually rejoined the site fairly recently, and was unable to access any of their "epic" features with a basic 30$/m membership. Then there's the streaming only, no downloads. Give me a break. As much as I like their contract girls, I've concluded that their product just isn't worth it. I'm desperately hoping that Kayden Kross and Stoya go independent in the near future, or sign a contract with virtually anyone else. A year ago, I wouldn't have even considered that thought.
Also. Arrested Development - fuck yes.
Edited by - JB_X on 5/20/2013 3:56:21 AM
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - May 20 2013 : 2:35PM
Totally agree, but as I've said elsewhere on this thread DP don't give a shit about the consumer. My advice,for what it's worth, take your hard earned elsewhere rather than give it to this absolute joke of a porn company. All the films are the goddamn same anyway so you won't be missing anything.
PornStarNamedBuckNaked All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sometimes life is goofier than a monkey on ether
12073 Posts
7/10
Posted - May 20 2013 : 2:54PM
^ +1,000 well said
Idlewild66
Deactivated User

721 Posts
12/11
Posted - May 24 2013 : 9:23AM
I'm sick of Eric Everhard and Manuel in every movie
Lezlover
Member

527 Posts
9/12
Posted - May 24 2013 : 1:06PM
Unfortunately that's DP for you. They seem to focus more on the men than the women. You only have to check out the orgy scenes at the end of the "blue ribbon" features. There could be five girls having a whale of a time, but we don't get to see it because it's all about the guy. I'm pretty sure that's not what everyone wants to see but with DP what we want, we don't get.
Quorrl
Senior Member

2835 Posts
3/11
Posted - May 24 2013 : 6:55PM
Page 2 of 5 First 2 3 4 > Last



Jump To: