pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jun 18 2011 : 4:24AM
Directed by Graham, shot by Mason, Dee and Ladd, starring Jessie Andrews. More info and screens here. Stoked to see a feature by the best gonzo company out there today. Considering how well shot and lit their gonzo is, plus the quality of their sex scenes, I'm really looking forward to this.
Yeah, this does look promising. Well shot too. I'm not expecting any kind of brilliant plot, but this appears to be a noble effort. And is that MacArthur Park she's in in the final screen?
That diner is in a lot of pornos. ;) I'm looking forward to this too. Their previous effort didn't appeal to me - not because it didn't look quality, but because I'm not into superheroes. I don't think I've ever seen Jessie perform, but if those stills are any indication of what she brings, I'm stoked to see it. Even with the whorepaint on, her natural beauty can't be smothered. I just wonder how much story vs. sex it's gonna be. Will it be a true feature film or just a story string to tack sex scenes on?
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 2 2011 : 6:42PM
The teaser looks better than I imagined, great score too. Good to see EA went with a light romantic comedy for their first feature.
[Link]
prince1andyjesus Deactivated User
Love not always x. And are you consumed by the flesh? 7 Posts 6/11
Posted - Jul 2 2011 : 9:37PM
I hate hardcore. I think that elegant angel are generic mean guys. Total submission to Lord. How about an adult film with me andy tkr and audrey bitoni star together as sex crazed newlywed lovers with a party city dark hipsters newark,oh imperial country club try to break us up. And i andy am overweight so she somthers me in a scene.By Stoping mail men, prositutes to the mailmen. But christian love conquers all. Andy t(be patient) and super buetiful audrey bitoni. amen? amen!!WOW to me. Rev 12 9 rom 3 23jvz,col 3 11 righteousness not self. Love you audrey b!!!!!!!!!!!!! And tennis star petra kv? Thanks.
Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04
Posted - Jul 5 2011 : 9:12AM
Yeah, I really want to like this movie as a feature, but am not getting my hopes up that this will actually be a 'feature' in the true sense of a story and more than basic dialogue. From the preview it certainly is a very beautifully shot movie.
I'm all for this type of movie being made. I think when companies like Elegant Angel and Evil Angel do feature movies like this they turn out a much better product than companies that produce these on a regular basis like Vivid and Wicked. That being said...I'm puzzled by the choice of Jessie Andrews in the lead role. I would have liked to see Andy San Dimas, Kristian Rose or Dani Jensen. Edited by - m.b. on 7/5/2011 8:44:40 PM
hey there it's Jessie :) I just wanted to say hello!! and that I appriciate all the comments about the movie:) I'd like to thank Elegant Angel for giving me the honor to play this part<3 It really means a lot to me! We all put so much effort and time into this movie, IT IS GOING TO BE AMAZING I already know it ;) Word on the street is it's going to be released very soon (closer to the the end of the month) and i hope you've already pre-ordered it!!!! and if you haven't I think you should<3333333 Anyways I hope everyone loves and enjoys the movie as much as I do!!!! I LOVE ELEGANT ANGEL, RAWR:) xoxojessie
I wonder if there are any scenes with good sex? Or is it just all tasteless crap with her being treated poorly as a call girl? The running eye makeup in the previews probably confirms it's the latter :(
Now, I've been known to be pretty harsh on modern XXX features and call them out on being nothing more than generic crap, but this looks like a cut above the average, at least as far as what I can tell from the trailer. In fact, this movie looks much classier than about 90% of modern features so I'm not sure why you're assuming it'll be "tasteless."
I obviously haven't seen it yet. I just saw what looked like a story about a call girl getting treated badly. And I saw running mascara which is about as appealing as eating dog shit. But, who knows. Maybe there is good sex somewhere in it. I'll obviously skip most of the scenes but can hope for one tasteful one.
Steph should send them a pair of panties that say, ADT - We've got you covered. for this kind of thing. Or, maybe a half dozen panties in different colors.
Running mascara makes me wanna . Glad there'll be a scene like that. And a GANG FACIAL! Mope >>>><<<< Mope Edited by - skronker on 8/11/2011 12:54:17 AM
Well the title doesn't exactly suggest a feel-good movie, but I wouldn't assume too much either way. Previews can be misleading sometimes, even in porn. I'm fairly sure this will get reviewed fairly soon after it is released, so it might be something you will need a different perspective on. I don't always expect much from feature films, but somehow this one has my attention.
[Link]
tigermore Deactivated User
116 Posts 7/11
Posted - Aug 12 2011 : 6:06AM
Please Graham, can i see some photos about the blowbang scene? Thanks :-)
I saw it and wasn't impressed. Maybe because I'm not all that interested in Jessie Andrews. She does nothing for me when it comes to looks or performance. As I mentioned earlier I would have been all over this if it was someone else in the main role because it's a good idea for a movie, but the choice in leading role was a huge letdown for me. Worth a rent for the curiosity factor as it's outside of what Elegant Angel usually does, but that's about it.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Sep 1 2011 : 1:56AM
I just streamed this on adultempire.com and I think Jessie is really cute and her sex scenes in it are primal and sexy. I'm not usually into the thinner girlish types but ultimately I respond to something more than just 'type' in a performer. Her scene with Manuel here is of particular note, they have done good scenes before but this one really goes somewhere else. Also, since this is a feature it's about more than if one finds the central performer wankable. The tone here is very unique for a xxx feature, almost like a xxx version of Badlands (all the desert scenes and narration). It was also reminiscent of 3AM and the better John Leslie features, in that it very atmospheric and elliptical. Terrific cinematography and a superior soundtrack (the dialogue is all clear and well recorded as well, often a problem with modern features). Jessie's acting is quite good and all the supporting cast do well too. I'm definitely going to order a copy of this either on DVD or BR if that is available. Looking forward to checking out the softcore edit too to see how it views in that version. Edited by - BlackSix on 9/1/2011 4:00:01 AM
I have to disagree. This isn't the Sundance Film Festival. It's fuckin' porn. If the girls aren't "wankable" I'm not interested. Don't get me wrong. I don't think a girl with a huge set of fake tits and ass bustin' out all over the place is meant for this movie. But at least SOME body, SOME tits, or a filthy mouth, a sleazy whore, give me something, anything special or distinguishable from most other girls. It's just too "plain jane" for my liking in every way shape and form. The only scene that was interesting to me was the one where she did the older guy in a hotel/motel room because it was somewhat outside the norm from the rest of the movie. Otherwise, all these scenes could have come from any other Elegant Angel movie with no storyline. It's porn, the girl should be hot or at least slutty and sleazy and you should want to fuck her....bad! In this case they fell short, sorry. Edited by - m.b. on 9/1/2011 4:35:18 PM
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Sep 2 2011 : 3:12AM
That you don't find Jessie wankable is completely your subjective opinion, not some kind of fact. There's no arguing taste when it comes to desire. Her body type isn't what I'm usually into either but I can react to more than just my personal tastes in a sex scene, particularly when it's in a feature. I think Jessie brings considerable heat to her scenes and that is what works for me. Your first statement is also a bit odd for the Feature side of the forum, over here we care about the story, cinematography, etc. Is it Sundance? No, although I don't hold Sundance to be the peak of filmmaking either. Just because something isn't a masterpiece by De Sica doesn't mean it's not worthwhile. When talking about a classic film one doesn't hear a classic-era fan say "Veronica Hart isn't my type, therefore Amanda by Night sucks" or something similar about Spelvin in Devil in Miss Jones, Bree Anthony in the Taking of Christina, etc. A feature is more than the sum of its (private) parts. Edited by - BlackSix on 9/2/2011 3:22:37 AM
It's the first time I've watched Jessie in action aside from her prolific Twitter feed ... I found it absolutely bonerific. She's a great fucking performer, especially given all the hard sex ... not something I knew she was about. THey do what any XXX feature should in this project: combine a palpable intimacy with sexual ferocity and psychological motivation, with a mysterious, moody narrative, amazing photography (Canon 5D), a sound mix/soundtrack that insults no one's intelligence and contributes to the tone, a hot cute girl with issues doing nasty nasty things to complete strangers, even non-sex performers who for the most part are pretty credible, and a remarkably sustained tone that is anything but frivolous.
Also, she does that Aurora Snow double handed twisty thing when she grapples a hard cock and gives really spitty blowjobs. What is not to like? I hope she had a lot of throat lozenges handy. Jesus.
I started watching this yesterday (long movie), and so far I like it. I'm impressed at the brevity of certain scenes, as well as the mentioned-somewhere-else consistency in tone. It doesn't feel like the film stops, the porn sex starts, and then post-pop shot the film starts up again. After that first client scene, and subsequent masturbation/fantasy, all so nicely edited and integrated, I felt like crying "Hooray!!" I'm also impressed with the cinematography and whatever camera is being used -- but really, it's not just the technology, it's whose hands that technology is in, and everyone involved did an outstanding job here. The lighting, audio, and colours are quite something. I really hope EA try this formula again with something a little more original. I have nothing against the call girl narrative (it is, after all, the original pornographic story), but I'm excited by what EA have done here and I'm eager for them to breach new ground narratively.