I was very conscious to limit my negative remarks to exactly where they belonged. "Remark creep" is something I pay attention to in my reviews. If, for example, we see Ed and Tina Tyler or Jenna, is it fair that we savage the parts that Ed wasn't in? ;)

That said, I'm not much of a drinker but if you ever feel obligated to do something nice for me-spread the word about Ed and his lousy productions. Bad porn is far too frequently pawned off to unsuspecting customers. Even if you take his stuff as completely amateur, it still stinks! I've searched for a number of reviews since and have been amazed at how much some people like his work. It goes beyond "different strokes for different folks" too. Maybe the people who write those reviews get payolla or something...

As to value-that is my most subjective thing in a review. I figure the box is worth a dollar and if there is even a short bit of fun (one of the interviews was with a fetish queen and it was moderately interesting to me), I give it a few dollars besides.

To be honest, I had more fun reviewing it (a lot more) than watching it. Both he and Randy West have a knack for either having personal friends review their stuff or somethings up... ;)

[Link]