New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Dallas Rea

"I’m very submissive so I love being bossed around and told what to do."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 792 > Fashionistas - a contrarian view
AuthorPost
rjk13
Member


peace, love and revolution
321 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 1 2002 : 7:26AM
Well I girded my loins, got out the lube, pledged to stay away from the FF button. After all this was porn history in my living room.

4 1/2 hours? I have never watched a mainstream movie even close to that. And mainstream movies, if you are lucky, have interesting plots, compelling characters, witty dialogue, challenging themes, good pace and credible actors. You're not going to find much of that here. I can say categorically that every scene (except for the last) could have been cut in half. And nothing would have been lost. This would have been a good 2 hour movie.

It seems picky to criticize the lack of story in a porn movie. Actually I was glad there wasnt much more. Listening to Rocco struggling with his English dialogue is painful. Think Yves Montand in Grand Prix. The whole plot is Taylor loves Bella but also wants Rocco all for herself. Bella loves Rocco too. I have no idea why. I guess cock size but its not clear.

Taylor is excellent as always, but I wish Bella had more opportunities to say something. The sexiest scene is Bella stripping, alone in her apartment. The music and dancing is first rate throughout the movie. Bella definitely has star power and looks good even in casual clothes without makeup. The Taylor-Rocco and Bella-Rocco sex scenes are energetically raunchy, but the rest drift endlessly into tedium.

Then theres the S&M. You're going to be literally smothered in it. I like the rough stuff, but these latex masks, especially when they cover up beautiful Bella and distort her sensuous lips, do nothing for me. And the clothespins! If you find clothespins erotic, you will love this movie because they are everywhere. The low point is a scene where it looks like Bella's nipples are going to be torn right off her breasts. Doesn't seem like a healthy place to be.

I respect the effort, though, and in the context of the artistic wasteland of porn, I'm sure it will win lots of awards, and my tiny nay won't mean a hill of beans.

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Nov 1 2002 : 9:51AM
okay rjk13,

You've put a different spin on it.

One question. Did you stay away from the FF button? If you did, then that says something about the movie.

DenverDon

rjk13
Member

peace, love and revolution
321 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 1 2002 : 10:15AM
Denver Don

I did indeed stay away from the FF button, overcoming great temptation.

More telling perhaps was that I stayed away far too often from the lube.

tricia_devereaux
Evil Angel DVD

Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous?
4283 Posts
4/00
Posted - Nov 1 2002 : 8:04PM
rjk - no problems here with your opinion.

We knew that this movie wouldn't be loved by everyone, and that's OK. Some people love John's long sex scenes, and some get bored by them.
I think you're comments about character development lacking are valid. But being that the long sex scenes were top priority for us when making the movie, more character development would have meant 5 hours instead of 4 hours 40 min.!

Thanks for posting an honest opinion without resorting to being downright nasty!

BIGmike
B-I-G-m-i-k-e

2335 Posts
3/01
Posted - Nov 1 2002 : 8:17PM
Opinions vary, and this definitely an opinionated bunch, but seeing is how I haven't seen this yet, I can not comment on the film.

But I'm sure that there will be more positive and negative reviews for this film... it's all a matter of tastes in the end.

Thanks for posting an honest opinion without resorting to being downright nasty!

Yes, I will second that. That's a well written review, and certainly honest.

-A buttoned collar, starched and bleached
Constricting veins, the blood flow to the brain slows-

 
rjk13
Member

peace, love and revolution
321 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 2 2002 : 8:18PM
Tricia

Thanks for responding to my impressions in the manner you did. I actually hesitated quite awhile before posting, because I knew you were a very active contributor. You were one of my true favorites when you were performing, and I can only imagine all the hard work that went into the project.

But after reading a good many of your posts, I decided you wouldn't be offended, and I'm sure glad I was correct.

rjk13

Edited by - rjk13 on 11/3/2002 12:26:57 AM

Planet Sex
Deactivated User

1951 Posts
6/01
Posted - Nov 2 2002 : 9:00PM
Watched it on VHS (yep, it´s available on Brazil... on a pirate copy!). FF´ed a lot. Yes, it could´ve be trimmed or turned into two 2-hours films. But at least it´s not downright boring. Hey, I´ve seen 75-minute porns that felt even longer, like the entire output of yawn-y Mitchell Spinelli quickies.

The movie´s bad? Nyah, actually it´s quite interesting. Meesa like it, but let the world know that the "mainstream" Stagliano is an acquired taste. I managed to enjoy his wackiest experimental works (De Blond , for example), so I dug this one too.

It´s just that Rocco´s "acting" is soooo... ew! He´s the Victor Mature of porn, the Sonny Tufts of hardcore. Rocco Never Dies ? Puh-lease!

Edited by - Planet Sex on 11/3/2002 12:45:05 AM




Jump To: