Featured New Release
Box cover for Angel Anthology: Angela White, The
Angel Anthology: Angela White, The
Studio: Vixen
Release date: 7/31/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 708 > Foot-stepping-on-head fucking..
AuthorPost
MulePat
Member


189 Posts
6/01
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 2:53AM
Does anyone like this position: doggy, the girl's head is on the ground while the guy steps on it? I think it's pretty hot, but can't help wonder about the safety issues involved...like what he suddenly snaps her neck or something?

Questions for those who've done this, both giving and on the receiving end: how does it feel? how much pressure do you apply to her head? and for the girl, does it hurt?

Skeeter Kerkove
Member

967 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 3:09AM
I have done it before with Bridgette, I just put mild pressure, the girls who truly, for real like being dominated get off on it. Visually, it is a turn on for me, as long as the girl requests to be dominated.
The move is a Rocco move, God Bless Rocco!
Skeeter Kerkove "King of Sodom" Porn producer, director, performer. I am a huge fan of hardcore porn and I love all of the women in porn. "God Bless Pornography" A womans ass is a beautiful thing" Woman rule!
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 4:56AM
Sounds like a Khan Tusion position to me.....
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 5:52AM
I don't know, a manslaughter prosecution?

I hate this. I think it looks stupid, and I don't think it's hot, and of all the disrespectful things that happen to porn chicks, this one has even less redeeming value than usual.

To each, I suppose. But apart from the whole meanness factor, which is another issue altogether, the bottom line is it just plain looks silly. Just my opinion, but you asked.

Edited by - obibong on 4/1/2004 5:54:59 AM

jab_235
Member

Rocking the Bloc....
151 Posts
2/04
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 10:53AM
 
Janitor
Retired

Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service.
6409 Posts
11/99
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 2:42PM
really depresses me to read stuff like this. guess i just shouldn't read the whole forum...
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 3:22PM
Are you sure that was Brandon Iron and not Alek James Hidell ;-)

Oh btw, I find this position a HUGE turn off, I saw some stuff like this on Meatholes and it served nothing but the purpose of degrading the girl in a ultimate way but then again I guess it's the girls who choose to do this.

tricia_devereaux
Evil Angel DVD

Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous?
4283 Posts
4/00
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 3:24PM
Seriously, I was just asking some guys yesterday if they or anyone they know actually does this in real life.
It bothers me a little, and I can certainly say I don't understand it.
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 3:45PM
In Rocco's movies, it usually sets up the heartwarming moment when the girl, who by this stage is placed in such a submissive posture that it's kind of unreal, begins to suck Rocco's toes. This, also, is the moment when I hit the FF, as its a stone woodkiller. I am SO not interested in Rocco's foot.
Scott Kinney
xxximports.com

New Jersey
369 Posts
5/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 4:00PM
Just this past weekend, at a CQC seminar, while grappling
on the ground for a gun, and then for a knife, and later
with no weapons at all, my training partner stepped on my
elbow, shoulder, knee and ankle (not all at the same time).

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that, yes, it would hurt to have someone step on your head.

Further, I just cannot even imagine why anyone would do this as part of having sex......


Scott Kinney
Diversified Video Associates
www.xxx-imports.com

PornBoy
Deactivated User

642 Posts
2/00
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 4:24PM
In Anal Trainer Nacho Vidal steps on Brooke Balentine's head while nailing her in the ass.
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 4:45PM
I don't do this in real life and I'm not interested in watching it in porn. A submissive woman may indeed enjoy it but we sure as hell can't tell that with her head mashed into the ground.
BSD
Senior Member

San Diego, CA
2508 Posts
11/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 5:26PM
Friends -

Yeah, this foot-to-the-head stuff is a turnoff to me too.

Almost as much as all the spitting that's going on in porn these days.

BSD

lindi
Senior Member

12345
3205 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 7:51PM
Ramsey said:
Is it true that people who work in chicken plucking jobs do it because they like plucking chickens with no bathroom breaks, and that people who work for semi-conductor places in Tucson actually choose to punch out their time card as instructed and then go on working?

If girls get their heads stepped on and are getting paid for it, maybe they want to and maybe they don't.


Edited by - lindi on 4/1/2004 7:52:02 PM

Crucifixio_Jones
Senior Member

Arrogant & Obnoxious Narcissist
4727 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 7:59PM
Kiwi Ling vs. Mr. Pete in PXP's Sinful Asians #2 pretty much sums up my views on the subject:
Toe-sucking makes it even worse. It's not my thing personally but more power to you if it's yours and at least there are some guys and gals out there aiming to please you. To each his own.
 
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 8:55PM
My bitches beg for it, every time I jump in the saddle.
Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 9:40PM
I don't know if you meant they choose to do a scene for Meatholes.com, or they choose to do this Foot-stepping-on-the-head stuff. From what I've seen of the foot stuff - and I've seen Rocco do it and Manuel Ferrara do it - it didn't appear to me that they exactly discussed ahead of time that they were going to make this move, they just do it. You don't hear them say, "Would that be okay with you if I step on your head while I fuck you hard?"

My problem with it is the woman's neck is twisted 90 degrees to the side, and the man is applying pressure on her head to keep her this way. It looks plenty uncomfortable, and maybe it could cause some kind of injury.

There's another neck move that I'm starting to see, when the woman and man are in reverse cowgirl, and the man clasps his hands behind the woman's neck and forces her head forward at a sharp angle, while he's pounding away at her. I've seen Michael Stefano do this, and Steve Holmes. This one, it looks like the woman can hardly breath.

Maybe one of the porn actors can comment on the purpose and eroticism of this move. I just wish that they would leave the women's necks alone, and concentrate on other body parts.

Back to Rocco and his feet, I think he has a foot fetish. If he could, I bet we'd see him suck on his own feet, but he's not that flexible, so we get to see the women do the sucking for him. To be fair, he is constantly shoving women's feet into his own mouth.

Crucifixio_Jones
Senior Member

Arrogant & Obnoxious Narcissist
4727 Posts
10/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 9:46PM
In pro wrestling that maneuver is called a full nelson. After seeing it in so many movies lately and being a fan of wrestling, I figured if I ever became a male performer I could add plenty of interesting variations to adult entertainment by combining my knowledge of grappling holds and kinky sex. I'd list my ideas here, but I know someone would steal them or either not be able to fully grasp the descriptions. At any rate, it'd be MY gimmick and an awesome one to boot.
Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 10:10PM
So it's called a full nelson - is it legal in college or olympic wrestling, or not?

Yeah, maybe porn actors are running out of ideas and moves, so they've got to borrow from contact sports. My problem is when I see a 180, 190 lb man doing one of these moves on the neck of a woman who weighs maybe 110, 120 lbs. max. Not exactly an even match.

Do you think some of these porn actors don't realize how much stronger they are than the actresses?

jab_235
Member

Rocking the Bloc....
151 Posts
2/04
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 10:16PM
TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 10:38PM
It's been a while since I've been on the mat and my info may be wrong or out of date. But if memory serves the full nelson hold is only legal in olympic wrestling. Half nelsons and three-quarter nelsons have a turn aspect; as you over power your opponent, the pressure of the hold is relieved by turning him. The full nelson applies more or less symetrical preasure. You can completely submit to the hold without releasing the forces being applied to your neck and shoulders. When I wrestled is was (is?) regarded as too dangerous for high school and college wrestlers and was an illegal hold.

-T.C.

Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 1 2004 : 11:16PM
So, if a full nelson is (was) considered too dangerous for high school and college wrestlers, do you think it should be ok for gonzo porn scenes? I knew that there was something not right about this move. Is it dangerous because it can cause serious injuries?

From what I remember from high school, wrestlers were one dedicated bunch of athletes, who never stopped training. Plus, they only compete against someone in their weight class. This is what bothers me about seeing stuff like this in a porn scene, where the person doing the move is way bigger than the person on the recieving end of it.

Maybe the porn guys are trying to show how little strength it takes to overpower an actress? Or maybe there should just be a wrestling referee on the sofa/bed/floor with the actor and actress, so he can monitor the action, make sure everything follows all the regulations.

I'm waiting for Skeeter to chime back in with something along the lines of:
A Full Nelson! It's like a cum shot on the neck! It cures depression, it makes deaf mutes sing!

imak
Adult Film Legend

3345 Posts
2/04
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 12:22AM
ok cause I never strive for popularity,
I told Jamie Brooks I was gonna be working with mark wood the next day and she was like oooh ooh you lucky bitch get him to step on your head in doggy I love it when he does that. and i did.
Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 1:35AM
Mason
Member

872 Posts
7/02
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 2:14AM
Whenever I have done this in my private life, the slightest amount of pressure has been applied. For me it is simply a symbolic gesture of dominance. It wouldn't be any fun if the guy was really having a go at me with the full weight of his body.

The one thing I personally don't like about toe sucking is the damage is can cause to the roof of your mouth if your partner's toes nails aren't clipped. I got cut once, and it definitely left a bad taste in my mouth. I no longer toe suck, that's for sure.

 
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 2:52AM
Well I think the director should tell the girl before the scene that there will be foot-stepping in the scene and then she can decide if she wants to do it or not. I don't think it should catch her by surprise because I also doubt many women like that stuff.
pornopunk
Senior Member

1343 Posts
2/04
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 3:03AM
kami wrote: ok cause I never strive for popularity,
I told Jamie Brooks I was gonna be working with mark wood the next day and she was like oooh ooh you lucky bitch get him to step on your head in doggy I love it when he does that. and i did.

Kami is just too cool for words. You rock girl!!


-Sane today, tommorrow..who knows!!

Steve Holmes
Senior Member

1235 Posts
12/02
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 8:34AM
Dear Renee,

there are two purposes for it.

Some girls constantly move up if you don't lock her down like this. Also some girls can't keep their head up while getting fucked in both holes. It is to help her stay in the position.

Steve Holmes

TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 9:10AM
Quite co-insedentally, the night before last my wife and I found ourselves in what might best be described as the "inverted frog position", and as it happens, the best way to brace her so she grind against me with all her (considerable) strength was to go under her arms and behind her neck.

While one might call this a full nelson, the simple fact is that she was entirely in control of the forces excerted; Newton's 3rd law of motion was very much in effect, the harder she pushed, the harder I pushed back. But that works in reverse as well; anyone who thinks a woman is going to break her own neck in the throws of orgasmic bliss is worrying about something that's not going to happen.

On the other hand, it would very easy for me (or anyone else) to seriously injure another person using the full nelson hold. The danger of the hold (and I presume why it's banned from HS/Col wrestling) is that even after the recipient gives up resisting completely, tremendous force can still be excerted on the neck and shoulders. In a wrestling match between equallly matched opponents, both intend on victory, this could happen quite suddenly; strength can give out quite abruptly.

I suppose this could happen in a sex scene as well; but it seems extremely unlikely. The chance of the abrupt failure of resistance seems remote. I outweight a typical porn starlet by about 70 pounds; by dint of leverage and strength the resistance a 115 pound woman could provide would be virtually inconsiquencial. But unlike a choke hold, in a full nelson I would get A LOT of feedback from the the woman as my application of force increased. First she would say "stop you mutherfucker, you're hurting me." If I continued to apply preasure in the absense of muscular resistance I would feel resistance from connective tissue as joints were pushed beyond their normal range of motion. Presumably this would be accompanied by a lot of catterwailing, and even more caterwailling as these connective tissues failed (anyone who's ever torn a ligament knows what I'm talking about!)

As far as what is or is not okay for a gonzo series, I have no problem with rough sex, spitting, choking, vomiting, or whatever else people what do put on tape. In my "day job" I deal with imagery that is infinitely more disturbing than anything I've ever seen or heard of in a sex tape. It's not about what you show, it's how you show it.

-T.C.


Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 11:03AM
I can understand you've got to do something in the case where the woman is constantly moving up. What if you held onto the woman by throwing one arm around her shoulders, and another around her waist? This would give her part of you to hold onto, at the same time. (This sounds like we need to consult with some sort of professional, maybe it should be a wrestling coach, or a physical therapist, or a mechanical engineer.)

This may sound like a stupid question, but why does the woman have to keep her head up when she's being DP'ed? From the way this is caught on film anyway, you can hardly see much of her body as it is, so what difference does it make where her head is, as long as it's comfortable for her and she can breath?

When I read a comment like Tony C.'s above, I get concerned about moves like this, whose purpose is to immobilize an opponent, and that the move has to be done with some care to avoid injuring the other person.

A little aside about the man shoving his toe into an actress' mouth - I bet anything that Rocco doesn't bother to trim his toenails before one of these manuevers of his. I bet he doesn't tell a woman that he's going to do this anyway, hell I bet he doesn't plan what he's going to do for a scene, he just does what he wants, when he feels like it.

TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 11:34AM
In wrestling the purpose of a nelson, be it half, three-quarter, or full, is not to imobilize your opponent, but to turn them. But because a the preasure in a half or three-quarter nelson is asymetrical, the result of a sudden loss of the ability to resist is a turn, i.e. you'll turn you will be rolled to your back before your neck or shoulders give way. Because the full nelson is symetrical, if your opponents stregnth suddenly gives way while one is excerting full fight-or-flight fueled strength, injury could occur before one's opponent was turned.

When I use a full nelson like embrace on my wife, the purpose is not to turn her, or sap her strength in her struggle to resist, but to create a rigid connection between us so we each have something to push against. Without it, our grinding would result in our becoming uncoupled, rather than driving my penis more deeply into her vagina. That rigid connection also allows her to more precisely "steer" my penis so that it hits the spots she wants to hit.

I lace my finger behind neck because a) it provide a more solid connection (this is also what makes it a powerful wrestling hold) b) it supports her head (more comfortable for her) and keep her from bashing my face with her noggin (I got a fat lip once from one of her orgasmic convulsions.

To hurt someone in a non-wrestling situation with a full nelson would require extraordinary insensisitity to one's parter. I can't imagine ever exerting enough force on someone that I outweighed by 70 pounds that even a sudden and catastrophic failure of their ability to resist would result in injury. As I said, feedback from the person in the hold would tell you you were going to far LONG before any damage was done. Are there people who use this move in rough-sex porn who go to far anyway? You'd have to tell me. Are there people who enjoy this? Perhaps. There's hardly anthing one can imagine that someone somewhere doesn't get off on either doing or watching. (Wasn't there a german guy who consented to being slowly tortured and eaten?)

I will say this: in nearly 15 years in "the scene", I've never encoutered anyone who regarded intentional damage to connective tissue (tendons, ligaments) as a part of rough sex or SM play. I would be extremely sceptical of anyone who offered that a sprained ankle, let alone a sprained neck, was a ligitmate goal, or even a ligitamate risk in scene play. (I have heard of fingers being sprained in fisting encounters.) I'd be far more inclined to regard a person making such claims as a low-grade sexual predator (if they were a 'top'), or sadly damaged career victim (if they were a "bottom".)

-T.C.


Edited by - TonyC on 4/2/2004 11:47:40 AM

tricia_devereaux
Evil Angel DVD

Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous?
4283 Posts
4/00
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 2:16PM
I think I understand Tony - you're not immobilizing her with a tight full-nelson. You're giving her more surface area to brace herself against and push off from.

Steve - I'm sorry, but I don't completely understand your reasoning. Putting a girl's neck forward at such an angle IS pretty dangerous. Putting your hands around her shoulders and grabbing her shoulderblade area would be MUCH less dangerous.

skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 3:20PM
That I like to see!
EvilBatman
Member

Ka-me! Ha-me! HA!!!!!
383 Posts
5/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 3:21PM
Speaking from a couples standpoint on this position, here's a real life story. I was watching the trailers on one of my Red Light dvds and I saw the preview where Fujiko is getting it in the said position. I was just flabergasted buy this. I mean, the guy is STEPPING ON HER HEAD! That's just fucking crazy. So, I called my girlfriend to the living room and showed her what I had seen. Her honest to god reaction was that after watching it, she stared at me for about ten seconds, then she hit me in the shoulder. Hard. Her exact words were "Damn you for buying something like this! And don't get any fucking ideas either!" Now, I wouldn't have ever attempted this on her but I just thought her total and utter negative reaction to it was funny. Almost as funny and fucked up as the move itself. So there's a real life experience with it.

Also, I've come to personally call the position the "True Romance" position. Frankly, because it seems like it's anything but.

\m/\m/
"Rock the hut." Dimebag Darrell

Edited by - EvilBatman on 4/2/2004 3:25:54 PM

TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 4:51PM
You say more surface area, I say a more rigid connection; I think we're talking about the same thing. The point I was trying to make is this:

My wife likes very physical sex, not rough sex, not SM; just very physical, muscular sex. If you took snap shot of us, you'd probably end up with some shit that looked every bit as weird as head-stepping (okay, maybe not that weird) But if you thought it was about the particular placement of limbs (like my forearm across the back of her neck when we're doing prone rear-entry) you'd be missing the point altogether.

Weird shit that happens (like hooking her feet on the crook of my elbows, and then using that as an anchor point so I can pull her arms back until her back is so arched I can kiss her) are a byproduct of the passion and abandon that we feel when we're having a good fuck. Sometimes it might even be a short cut (Pavlovian response I suppose.) But it's never an end in and of itself.

That's where most porn leave me absolutely cold. It's not that this crazy shit doesn't turn me on; it's that it's so dissapointing when I see something I know would be hot to do, but somehow the pornographer has failed to make it hot to watch

-T.C.

 
cobalt60
Knuckle Dragger

2046 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 5:07PM
Thank you for clarifying -- I now realize now I've been using the wrong terminology in my own descriptions. It's certainly not rough sex (not as its understood within the context of ADT, God no, she'd kick my ass), nor SM; it's more like wrestling! My wife's almost the same size as me, strong as hell and very physical. Some of the contortions we end up in are very similar to what you've described so far. Maybe we should call it WrestleSex ?
TonyC
Comstock Films

2523 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 5:29PM
If the word weren't so hopelessly corrupted by the WWE, I'd call it Lovewrestling .

When I first met my wife, she was in the habit of hitting the weights about 2 hours a day. No girlie 5 pound curls either; she was benching well over her body weight. I couldn't take her unless I resorted to using 'wrestler's tricks' in spite of the fact that I outweighed her by 60 or 70 pounds (granted, much of that was useless flab.) Now when we battle she goes after my bum shoulder. The bitch is ruthless.

Back to the neck stepping. I think neck stepping could be very hot. The key would be to have one person step on the chick's neck, while someone else nailed her. Extra points if fascist uniforms or jackboots are involved.

But if you try to do the head/neck step thing all yourself you just look silly. More over, you look vulnerable. Anyone familar with the dangers of throwing a high half nelson knows what I'm talking about. (My wife does this all the time and I always get the reverse to a nice tight head and arm. After eight years she still hasn't figured out what she's doing wrong. Don't any of you tell her!)

-T.C.

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 6:22PM
Stepping on a head is just not polite. If you see a head on the ground, step around it.

Is "Uncle" still the universal safe word for bedroom wrestling?

The Kama Sutra is the ultimate wrestling guide.

cochise
Member

You gonna pull them pistols or whistle dixie?
238 Posts
12/03
Posted - Apr 2 2004 : 6:38PM
I think it's bullshit.
Steve Holmes
Senior Member

1235 Posts
12/02
Posted - Apr 3 2004 : 12:29PM
Dear Renee and Tricia,

this holding her head up is not dangerous at all. Other than in wrestling I don't put much force in it. It is neither dangerous nor painful. So far no girl ever complaint.

Steve Holmes

stefank60
Member

Gold Trader on ADT
383 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 3 2004 : 12:38PM
don't like it at all - please stop doing it guys
valjean4876
Member

953 Posts
3/04
Posted - Apr 3 2004 : 6:41PM
How about it looks hot as hell in a dom-sub role play scenario.

And yeah, Rocco probably doesn't say to every girl he does a scene with, hey, is it okay if I step on your head while I fuck you?

But if you have ever seen Rocco fuck, and then you do a scene with him, you KNOW what you're getting in to.

X_Marks_the_Spot
Member

New Mexico
10 Posts
2/04
Posted - Apr 3 2004 : 6:59PM
Personally I haven't stepped on any womans head or face while having sex, I wouldn't want her to be brain damaged or scar their faces.

The most I done was have a woman hang over a bed frame and perform a partial headstand, or sometimes standing up 69 where I am holding her weight and all the blood is rushing to her head while she gives oral.

Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 4 2004 : 12:09AM
Thanks for the explanation. I don't think we have to worry about any porn actors getting hurt from an actress' orgasmic convulsion, considering the rarity of real strong female orgasms like this in sex scenes.

You mentioned that your wife could (can) bench press well over her own weight. I wonder how many 115 lb. porn starlets can do the same. I bet it's not that many, considering how petite and slim most of them are.

I've watched around 25 porn scenes with Rocco. I don't think he even knows what he's going to do once a scene starts, he's that free-form. Maybe he'll step on the girl's head, maybe he won't, it all depends on whether he can get his foot in close proximity to her skull.

Rocco said in an interview recently with a Brussels newspaper that he considers himself to be rather 'cerebral'. Perhaps he was referring to his penchant for stepping on heads, because that's gets you close to a woman's brain, for sure.


valjean4876
Member

953 Posts
3/04
Posted - Apr 4 2004 : 1:49AM
LMAO! Cerebral? Maybe he is. I guess if I got to fuck all day for money and have so many people talk about my virility as if I'm some sort of Adonis, I'd be an egomaniac too. That is funny.

And you're correct. I might be simplifying it too much. I just meant his style is evident. I have, actually, only seen him in a clip from True Anal stories 9 , and in the Fashionistas DVD I bought last month.

Both of which, BTW, were better than I ever thought porn could be considering what I grew up stealing from my father's closet. Although Candy Stripers was decent, if I remember correctly. I'm babbling.


Edited by - valjean4876 on 4/4/2004 1:50:56 AM

Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Apr 5 2004 : 10:24AM
Valjean,

Here is the thread where there was a discussion about Rocco's statement on being 'cerebral' with respect to the women in his films. You'll see there's a variety of opinions expressed about him.

I have to say, out of the 25 or so scenes of his that I've watched, there are some rare occasions where he does ask the actress if everything is okay, sometimes more than once. Twice this was because the actress was shy and inexperienced; for instance, Elizabeth in 'Rocco Invades Poland', and Timea in 'Rocco's Initiations 7'. With this last actress (who was also in Brandon Iron's Bell Bottoms as Alice), Rocco went so far as to ask her in both English and Hungarian if he should stop during the scene. The other time I have seen him show some concern is the last scene in Rocco's Way to Love with Kelly Stafford, who is an experienced actress who likes rough sex. He asked her multiple times if she wanted to stop (because it was getting too rough), and twice she did tell him to stop, which he did immediately.

I'm not certain if Rocco does this out of genuine concern, or because he doesn't want to push the actress too far, have her walk out without finishing the scene, and then he loses the footage that he's already shot. He has hinted that this has happened to him, in a brief interview that he gave to Brandon Iron in the beginning of "I Love it Rough 2". Rocco says something to the effect that you (meaning the director) have to know an actress' limits when performing a rough sex scene, or you can end up finishing the scene by yourself (he says this with a somewhat sheepish look on his face).

valjean4876
Member

953 Posts
3/04
Posted - Apr 5 2004 : 2:13PM
Thanks! Interesting read.

Like I say, The only two things I've seen of Rocco are Fashionistas (100% incredible!) and that outstanding scene from True Anal stories 9 with Svetlana and Suzan I think.

Both scenes blew me away. I don't remember the foot-head thing in TAS 9, but he definitely did it in Fashionistas, and it turned me on every time. I like it much better, and it conveys the same thing , when he is doing them doggy and he sticks his foot NEXT TO their head and they suck on his big toe. That said though, as mentioned somewhere else, the pause for time to let the girls suck his toes while he strokes it is bloody vomit inducing. Well, not literally, but it's gross.

I am still deciding what my favorite kind of porn is, what I accept and what I don't. One thing I'm learning is that my brain doesn't always agree with my penis, but who's fucking does? That's one great thing about porn, it doesn't have to. I hope that makes sense, lol.

However, since I've only been watching for a matter of months, what the hell do I know?

MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Apr 5 2004 : 2:29PM
Makes absolutely perfect sense to me.
I've been watching porn for over 14 years, and I still don't know shit. The truth is, the more I watch, the more confused I get. :)

Some people see topics like this as a black and white issue... I guess I'm just not one of them.

I'm a little late saying this, but welcome to the forum, valjean4876! We're glad to have you here, and I for one am glad to see that I'm not the only one who doesn't have all the answers. :)

Welcome.

Edited by - MLyons on 4/5/2004 2:31:29 PM

valjean4876
Member

953 Posts
3/04
Posted - Apr 5 2004 : 2:32PM
Thanks MLyons!



Jump To: