^Hey, why are you taking my name, mate? I am not a professional reviewer; I review for fun. Right now, I am not sure how many more movies I will review. Second, I have said multiple times that my reviews are subjective. If the sex scenes resonate with me, I like them; if not, I simply do not watch them again. For me, storylines should be included, but as I mentioned before, I prefer scenes with passionate sex featuring strong chemistry, engaging body language, and a significant focus on the foreplay phase before oral sex. That's why I appreciate Mike Quasar's direction-he invests more time in making the sex scenes intense rather than placing too much emphasis on the storyline. Objectively, every director has his own style, mate, which I can't argue with. I may prefer one director over another; that's my choice. I respect every director's work, including B. Skow. He had his own vision for shooting, which I often felt was not good-that's all. Ricky Greenwood has his own style, as do Craven Moorehead (Allherluv) and Alanx (She Seduced Me). It's just that directors sometimes fail to understand what a woman's body is like when shooting sex scenes in porn. A woman's body consists of both upper and lower parts, all of which deserve attention and appreciation during sexual activities. The director tends to focus more on the vaginal area rather than the entire body, which is why I often dislike scenes where there is an imbalance between the foreplay phase and oral sex. Mike Quasar's scenes currently strike a balance that no studio, including GFF Studio, is offering me right now. Even then, in Lesbian Sister-in-Laws 3, I particularly enjoyed Scene 2, featuring Kate Dalia and Khloe, and Scene 4, featuring Scarlett and Lilly Bell. The same quality was present in the first two scenes of My Lesbian Daughter-in-Laws 3, as well as the scene with Isa Bella and Scarlett Moon ("Married to Him, Craving Her"). All the scenes I mentioned showcase the type of lesbian sex scenes I prefer. Please note, I am not referring to the storylines here-that should be included and can be unique, but they are secondary for me and not my top priority.
I have a similar subjective opinion about BG porn; I am very selective when it comes to it. That's why, most of the time, I prefer only Vixen.com scenes, and even then, only one-on-one scenes. I enjoy scenes from Bellesa Films and Pure Taboo, especially when they create scenes like "The Housekeeper" and "Taste for Older Men," respectively. Deeper.com and Tushy.com may be earning more than Vixen.com, but I don't like their content because I'm not a fan of anal sex or rough kind of sex. In fact, I only liked one scene from Deeper.com, which featured Gianna Dior and Mick Blue in a scene called "Unlocked" that was released in 2018.
So, don't take me too seriously, mates.😂 Watch what you like and prefer. 🙏
By the way, just for your information, my favorite performers Charlie Forde, Addison Vodka, and the latest addition, the best performer in the industry right now, Octavia Red follows me on Twitter. 😘 Not to mention, my favorite director, Mike, also follows me. ❤️
^ Whoa! I thought @LezTrib was complimentary to you. They don't find that Captain Jack reviews are objective or complete, but they believe that sometimes yours are (more objective and mention the non-sex stuff)! Given that you don't do this professionally, that's very impressive and shows how passionate you are about it. Personally I dislike reviews which are more a synopsis of the action which takes place. I don't need/want to read what happens, I want to read everything around that: chemistry/connection, shot composition, story, general "feeling" of how erotic it is or not. But it appears to just be me, people seem to love even frame by frame images in a "review". I don't need Captain Jack telling me that a pair of legs do something (see Straight Girls review), it doesn't in the slightest matter to me, considering people have legs to walk, that's what they do!
I too think it's an unfair comparison of the BG (or any multiples there of) offered in VMG and GG offered anywhere else. I don't find that BG comes anywhere near the sensual eroticism and romanticism of GG, that's what attracted me to it in the first place. We appear to be largely in agreement that preferably there ought to be a longer, if not better, pre-sex story. Then when it comes to sex, that really depends on the style they're after. I for one want to see that connection of "body worship" between the two (harder to do with more, but the occasional multiple can be in contrast), the slow, sensual, movement of almost devouring their lover entirely. So many scenes these days the performers go from a couple of minutes kissing to gazing at the pussy and fingering (okay oral, or the approximation of it might be included). Although I did watch ...Vajacial (All Girl Massage, 2026) which has plenty of build-up (36 minutes), yet very low in actual seductive, erotic, arousing, sensual action until sudden and inexplicable oral.
All that's really needed is a person with the wherewithal to capture the action well while letting something spontaneous happen, if it can, and the connections, dosh, and intention to book people who like and/or are good at doing stuff with other women so that rare, organic moments have a bit better chance at happening.
The more fake and poorly-acted the GG sex in a video is, the less difference there will be when a video generator tries to.copy it.
I can't wait for normal, human behavior to be the big thing in GG, which is inevitable as the bots git gud at replacing the low-quality fake-behavior slop with low-quality bot-made slop that looks exactly the same. Just a matter of time.
^Girl Crazy, I've been here on this forum for the last year, and honestly, I still don't understand what exactly you want from the GG industry. 😂 You have your criticism and everything, but sometimes you use such technical language and complicated words that I don't even understand half of what you're saying. 😂 But the moral of the story, as far as I understand it, is: all the studios making GG content whether it's good, bad, or worse should shut down or merge with Girlsway because that's what you want. 😜 Sorry, but I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon. 😂
That's exactly what I'm saying-where is the extensive foreplay phase that used to happen before? A lot of imbalance has been created in the portrayal of sex scenes these days. When I say Mike is the only director who currently provides genuine kissing sequences, breast worship, and the warming of each other's bodies before depicting oral sex, I mean it sincerely. Then fans say there is too much formulaic, pre-scripted content, darker camera work, and, last but not least, they want to watch videos in 4K. Additionally, you don't know whether they are watching his videos legally or not.
^^ Well said @DanielMayu... I can't fathom what they mean given how contradictory and uninterpretable/comprehend-able. I propose it as spouting from the well and warn against expending any energy trying to decipher. Thankfully there are so many others that are interested in GG and GFF that we can have a rigorous and healthy discussion and share viewpoints in an open forum.
^What are you talking about? I am not able to understand. The recent video of Kate Dalia, and Octavia Red kissing are AI-generated. Are the performers doing AI-generated oral sex? The straight girls' movie reviewed by Captain Jack is AI-generated, and the movie itself has been watched by more than 30,000 people. Everything you say is correct, and the viewers who watch porn are watching AI-generated and fake content. Try to respect the directors and filmmakers and performers along with viewers who spend their hard earned money for god sake
Edited by - Danielmayu33216 on 9/2/2026 1:04:53 AM
I wonder if there are projects that are waiting on François, or whether he'll be the one to start that process. You'd suppose there be others higher up setting the agenda, wouldn't we?
From what I’ve read and researched about GF Films over the past many years, GFF doesn’t have that many people working in the studio. Earlier, it was mainly Dan, along with Sabrina and maybe some Candy Girl staff, who were involved in the generation of his movies/scenes. Even during the B. Skow era, there weren’t many people involved, so basically, the vision for writing and shooting depended on just a few people. Now, after watching their latest movie, LS Volume 83, I have a real doubt was the whole movie actually made by B. Skow, or was there some involvement from a new director as well?
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2383 Posts 12/17
Posted - Sep 2 2026 : 2:46AM
If you go on GFF blog, every movie there is reviewed by the Captain instead of anyone else. In other words, they are not getting alot of feedback from anyone else through said reviews because nobody else is putting it on their doorstep. Considering they rank at the top of independent studios, I don't see them disappearing by any means. Depending on what site you go with - their revenue is supposedly anywhere from 5 to 31 million which is hardly shabby and more than enough to keep going. Normal human behavior? That does not sell: Fast & Furious saga, Transformers, MCU, Dune - none of those behemoth franchises or movies made massive profits based on showcasing normal human behavior. Porn is no different, you'll be a senior citizen with all due respect before the porn you want gets popular and even then, it will be done by cyborgs rather than humans so studios don't have to pay which will make you want to swear off it entirely. GFF is believed to have up to 50 employees, for comparison - Evil Angel is believed to a little over 61 employees but remains profitable. According to Google, companies like SHV typical have fewer than 50 permanent employees.
^ Yeah, I could have anticipated that it would be a small team. I have read that before regarding who actually writes porn scripts and found, at least in that instance, many were hurriedly written as the shoot started. It was actually slightly funny story that I did research on it because a person I knew from high school/secondary school tried to sound cool as well as counter-culture by saying he was a script-writer for US porn. I just had to debunk that obvious bravado nonsense. As much as I found, there wasn't ever such a role in any studio anywhere.
I tried sharing it, but they blocked me 😂 Maybe they've been reading my reviews, or perhaps I now need to submit my invoices along with every review as proof that I actually purchased the rental, streaming, or download access. 😂
While everyone seems to be jumping on the "Girlsway-style content" bandwagon, that's not exactly what I'm saying. 😅
"Girl Crazy" and "LezTrib" have already suggested that studios should either shut down or simply merge with Girlsway. And now there are even accusations that some directors are basically producing AI-generated performers, AI videos, and faking everything for the viewers. 😂
So maybe the ultimate solution is to just merge every studio into one giant super-studio! Bring all the directors together and rotate them for every scene and movie. At least then we might finally get some good-quality content in the future. 😂 Who knows maybe the next big innovation in the industry is not a new studio, but one mega-studio with 47 directors fighting over the same scene. 😆
^ Nah, the pure economics of too many chefs in the kitchen. There are people who want to do things different than that other crowd. Viewers, let alone passionate fans, don't want homogeneity, not even in the same network, or scene by scene, never mind across different studios.
I think there is an absolute fight against AI in every media. Almost nobody wants to see any AI in a show or film they're watching, or game they're playing, or image they're viewing. It's almost used as an alarmist warning to caution against: beware the AI will ruin your shows! Sure there's going to be a few that want to cut corners, but in the main I'm sure people with a vision (i.e. The Odyssey) they're not going to do it via AI. The economics of AI sounds as if it's doomed to fail, nobody is paying the true cost of it. There are currently 4 major companies funding the US trillions being spent, a concern is how long that can go on. At the moment it all seems, their motivation to invest, to be based on FOMO.
I'm really curious to know whether my first Vajacial-type, long-buildup scenes are still being made. If something like this doesn't come out on Girlsway, do you think people would actually watch it? Is there still an audience for these kinds of long GG scenes? Does anybody remember a scene that wasn't similar in content but was around 1 hour 30 minutes featuring RayVeness & Cindy Hope in Women Seeking Women 60? Because honestly, I can't watch such long buildup scenes anymore. I've become a very impatient man 😂
^ How long or what percentage of time did they did they spend on the sex, in that 1 hour 30 minutes scene with RayVeness & Cindy Hope in Women Seeking Women 60? What actually went on for all that time?
For the vajacial scene ~20 minutes was spent on sex, from the beginning of oral, out of 56 minutes 4 seconds (sex takes up ~35.67% of the entire thing). As to whether that ~36 minutes is entertaining or worthwhile: there are only hints of sensuality, seduction, or eroticism which is certrainly not enough to suggest Alison is falling or enticed by the massage.
It was a very slow-paced scene, with around an hour devoted to sexual activity. The storyline involved a lot of sexual tension between the performers. During GFF's golden era, they made this kind of scene quite often, so I guess audiences at the time really enjoyed them which is probably why they kept making this style of content. In fact, a lot of Mindi Mink's GFF catalogue features this kind of romantic, erotic storyline. Now, I think audiences and fans have become more impatient and have moved towards the Girlsway-style format. Because of that, GFF may have lost some of its essence. If you watch LS #83, a lot of time is also devoted to sexual activity, but the overall feeling, because of the split-scene format, doesn't feel as satisfying. It starts to feel like the same formula being repeated across different scenes and movies. I guess that formula simply doesn't work as well anymore.
^ I guess we're different, I long for those days and scenes. This brought back to my mind a scene that last 10 minutes 10 seconds. When I first saw it I was doubtful that they would be able to cum is such short order.
On the volume "Girl Time" (X-Art, 2017): 1 "Girl Time" with Marley Brinx and Blake Eden - 18:43.185 2 "Kiss From a Rose" with Bella Rose and Salena Storm - 14:52.544 3 "Wet Perfection" with Little Caprice and Uma Jolie - 12:53.888 4 "Sex In the Summertime" with Lena Anderson, Blake Eden, and Naomi Woods - 10:10.347 5 "Superhot Sexting" with Anny Auora and Jillian Janson - 14:42.778 6 "My Favourite Taboo" with Ivy Jones and Lyra Law - 16:16.256
^^Okay, you've watched LS #83. Did you like it? Is it worth watching? Just a small review would be really helpful, I guess. It hasn't been released on Adult Empire yet, which is usually where I prefer to buy VODs. And honestly, just looking at the trailer and a few screenshots, I can't really judge whether it's worth watching or not.
Scene 1 was okay; some will definitely like it because Dakota resembles Little Pluck. The scissoring was particularly intense. Scene 2 is a very enjoyable scene to watch. I have recently started to like Hazel, so I might be a little biased towards her she is such a fun-loving girl. Scene 3 did not appeal to me much; there was a lack of chemistry between the characters, and many parts of the scene felt rushed or skipped. Scene 4 will appeal to some viewers; it was an okay scene overall. Amalia,looks very attractive in this scene. I particularly enjoyed the facesitting. So, if the movie is not one you want to purchase, you can simply stream it. The first two scenes look like the work of a new director. I don't know why, but I just have a feeling that it is.
^This means it's probably not worth watching right now. Anyways, thanks for sharing the review. I'll wait for their upcoming movie with a new director if they truly intend to continue GFF Productions.
This studio seems completely disinterested to me now. Just look at what other directors and studios are doing to attract subscribers, compared to what this studio is doing. Disappointing, big time.
^ That's typical of Amalia in all, or at least most, of her scenes. A rather remarkable ability, performance, and the right kind of look that has garnered fans. (Seen plenty in Viv Thomas, MetArt, Sex Art) I think we all wait in hope to see what the promise of a new director will do. It would rather freak me out if they actually post something in here.
^Why am I saying this and feeling that the first two scenes might have been shot by the new director? Mainly because of the color grading it looks noticeably darker compared to B. Skow’s brighter scenes. Also, there’s no mention on the AEBN website, and I even checked Data18, that this movie was directed by B. Skow. GFF usually gives him credit, so if this was his last production, it could mean that both B. Skow and François were involved. The crux of the matter is that not much has actually changed yet for fans to be excited about. As I already mentioned, this studio needs to seriously ponder and improve a lot of things. Simply changing the director isn't going to suddenly make them great.
