... porn site I've ever see ! The male performer sucks... A LOT ... The intro sucks ... teens Multiple Positions Suck she suck his big cock .. A LOT ... No teasing... Never anal .. No ass worship ... so yeah, the directing sucks pretty bad ! shame ... 'cause ... The girls are stunning.. Nick ! do something ! (the guy on Mompov ^^) [mod edit: changed thread title to reflect that this is a general discussion thread] Edited by - killbillvol69 on Sep 3 2016
^I don't know if both sites are owned by the same person but set-up and design are rather similar. What is clear is that if they are then they have better standards at mompov because they shoot far better porn than what GDP puts out. GDP may no longer shoot anal but that wasn't always the case because I remember seeing quite a few on the site. Mind you since they don't give a description of what you are getting than the only way to know is to join and I know that I will never join again even if all the girls do anal. The scenes are just so badly done that it's more frustrating than wood inducing.
[Link]
draga Deactivated User
170 Posts 12/13
Posted - Nov 5 2014 : 7:53AM
ah Pat merci d'avoir répondu ! je te réponds en français parce que je sais que tu parles la langue ... "I don't know if both sites are owned by the same person but set-up and design are rather similar." c'est clair que c'est très similaire ... mais je ne crois pas que les 2 sites soient détenus par la même personne ... "What is clear is that if they are then they have better standards at mompov because they shoot far better porn than what GDP puts out" Mompov s'est surpassé cette dernière année ... depuis qu'ils ont engagé un autre gars ... Nick ... son pov manque encore d'érotisme ... mais j'aime bien ... surtout qu'ils font que de l'anal ces 6 derniers mois !!! " I know that I will never join again even if all the girls do anal. The scenes are just so badly done that it's more frustrating than wood inducing." c'est tellement bon de lire ça ... maintenant je sais que je ne suis pas le seul ... et c'est vraiment dommage ... parce que ces filles méritent tellement mieux que des plans foireux ... lointain .. invisible .. etc ....
^Je n'ai pas trouver de connection entre les deux sites mais il semble assez certains que la personne qui produit Mom POV doit avoir essayer de copier une parti du style de GDP. Je refuse de croire que la personne qui film les scène de Mom POV est l'incompétant qui film aussi ceux de GDP. I have been a member of Mom POV twice already and I will soon be a member again while I tried GDP twice but I will never come again. I didn't even bother to keep any of the GDP scene because they are just too frustratingly awful to watch.
[Link]
kingdarius Deactivated User
President of the IDGAF Coalition 3288 Posts 2/10
Posted - Nov 5 2014 : 10:15PM
idk bout all that...they get some extremely nice females and the male talent bangs the hell outta them chicks..his facials are pretty weak tho and i wish they would just get rid of the condoms
I used to watch porn. I still do but I used to, too. 1514 Posts 8/09
Posted - Nov 5 2014 : 11:49PM
Yes, the girls on there are pretty damn hot! I think the scenes are just too textbook. There needs to be more variety and more 'spontaneity' with the scenes. More crazy facials, anal, possibly a DP once in a great while, girl-girl scenes. Just a little variety. The quality of the girls is fucking amazing though. At least they are doing that right!
I agree, they can do a lot better with the angles and set up. They're recruiting is amazing though, sometimes its so good it it compensates for the ways they lack, but ultimately it just makes it more frustrating they aren't doing better with the talent at their disposal. I don't agree the answer is going more extreme though. That's a porn hound fantasy. I think part of the reason they are able to get such great real amateur talent is because it's straight forward sex, with condoms. They shouldn't sacrifice their ability to get these girls to satiate porn hounds. They can, though, use a little more variety with the angles, the set up, etc. Considering they fly girls into San Diego, I'm not sure why they need to shoot everything in hotel rooms. Using a house or office with a better layout for getting different angles seems very doable. Maybe the girls are more comfortable doing the scenes in hotel rooms? I dunno...
[Link]
draga Deactivated User
170 Posts 12/13
Posted - Nov 8 2014 : 2:39PM
un certain dilofozorus sur le forum freeones dit : "Following in the steps of sister FO thread "girlsdoporn (Girls do Porn)" (gdp), I think it's about time we start a thread on this MILF & Mature paying site/blog. It is shot POV style by James, aka "realgirldoporn" (rgdp) FO user. Jordan, aka "jordan-gdp" user, says he has no control over RGDP and therefore probably not over MomPOV either but all of these sites/blogs are so similar in style/software/business you cannot help wondering who owns/manages what where when. It would be nice if James could clear it up for us in this thread. As of today, MomPOV sister sub sites/blogs are: ResidentMilf - free video samples BTS style with Amber. PlayWithAmber - webcam girl Amber specific free blog promoting her cam shows and MomPOV. TexasMilf - just starting out with Misty the "41 year old big tit texas freak" from MomPOV (so it seems)" choqué ... [o\|]
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Nov 9 2014 : 10:39AM
Disagree. http://www.girlsdoporn.com/ Don't know these guy's secret but they manage to cast some of the best amateur girls I've ever seen. My only problem with it is most of them only do one scene and disappear! Always be sure to check out their Twitter and Instagram pages where they are upload BTS pics all the time. I'll get the discussion rolling by posting my favorite episodes... E157 E170 E189 E191 E194 E204 E217 E218 E226 E230 E246 E255 E266 E284 What are yours?
^your post proves that the people responsible for GDP are complete idiots if nothing else. You just asked us to discuss not your favorite scene based on the name of the performer in it but on the number of the scene. You and I know that's the only way to do that because they don't bother to name the performers. Everything about this site is crap except for the women they hire. There is nothing else that is worth talking about.
Their recruiting skills are unbelievable. How do they do it is what I want to know. I wish blacks on blondes/blacked had their recruiting skills. Then I don't think IR fans would care about mainstream dodgers. I don't know if they are that sweet and nice to these girls. I have read several times that these guys are known for exposing their own girls and putting their real names out there.
^Never going to happen because BoB only hires performers while GDP only hires amateurs. Amateurs that for the most part will never shoot another scene.
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Nov 10 2014 : 2:57PM
Why do you need to know their names if 99% of the girls only do one scene?
Because no one recognizes who you are talking about by episode numbers. Take exploited college girls for instance, you would be more inclined to comment on Sarah from UCLA than episode 303. Even labels like the Miss Delaware contestant, or Miss teen colorado. I asked the question of them once, and they replied it was because of piracy that they labelled them that way. Once upon a time they gave them names, and nice little background stories, but their logic is flawed now. Pirates will pirate regardless, but by not bothering to name them or make any effort, they are just penalizing the ones who bother to fork out their money. I was a member, but I won't join again till they sort their shit out.
^Then you will probably never join again because I tried the sites twice over a period of two years and my last try at it proved that unlike wine. They don't improve with age. In fact they actually turned to vinegar(sorry for the pun). Their content in the beginning was decent if not very good but it was really bad when I joined again in 2013. I could list all the stuff that they do wrong but why bother when you already know what they are.
The best I can figure with their recruiting is, they advertise all around the country under the company Bubblegum Casting (lots of ads on craigslist). If you google the company you see some semi-professional non-nude shoots... they have a youtube page with a bunch of fake vids that might lead them to believe it's legit enough to get on the phone with the recruiter. So girls who have no aspirations for nude modeling or porn end up on the phone with a recruiter. Once on the phone,they are told they can make a lot of money, and how much, and offered round trip plane ticket to San Diego, a hotel, probably some other perks, and when suitably enticed, eventually told that what they have to do is shoot a porn video. Given that a lot of these girls are cash starved college students, and have been dangled the enticing bait of the pay and round trip ticket to a sunny ocean town, enough of them start thinking about it. A lot of girls probably feel empowered by being viewed as sexually attractive enough to be paid and be the center piece of a video. Speculation of course, but given how many of them agree to do it, probably not too off base. Edited by - RobinWood on 11/11/2014 1:04:14 AM
^I think you make sense and I don't find much wrong with what you wrote so I will only add that the women who finally do appear on GDP do so knowing that sex is what is expected of them rather quickly in the discussion with the producer(s) because they need to have a valid STI test prior to shooting their scene. I would also like to add that I'm not so sure that the bulk of the women who appear on GDP are college students. I rather think that most of them are likely strippers or cam models looking to increase their profile.
Nobody can argue with that... their recruiting skills are unbelievable.... damn right ghost88... ( I wish Mike adriano had their recruiting skills) we need someone to continue their work. they can't find people interested in buying their lifelong efforts.... right ??
It has been 100 episodes since the greatest scene on GDP, E194. Unfortunately we have no info on her and whether or not she would make more scenes. All we know is that she banged Chet Haze and gives really good deepthroat BJs. Here's to you, E194! [Image not found DB]
Out of curiosity, what kind of sites are there like gdp, which feature more extreme stuff like gangbangs, anal, bukkake etc? The idea of "first and last time I'll do porn" appeals to me -- even more if the acts are more extreme. I'm aware of facial abuse and a few others...
^To begin with. Do you know any site(s) where unknown amateurs do bukkake's, dp's and gangbangs? I don't know any. The closest you can get to what you are describing was the site Facial Abuse which is now called something else. In case you are wondering. I won't give you their new name because I think their brand of porn should not exist and therefore I'm not giving them free advertising. The main difference with the FA models is that most of them are not amateurs per say. They tend to be less known perfomers, cam models and a sprinkling of established performers. Any girl walking of the street who is asked to do that extreme porn like you described by a producer should run for the hill because no matter how bad she thinks it can be. The reality will be a 100 times worse. The FA type of porn is a perfect example of how bad it can get. The only three sites that I know to offer something sort of like GDP are: Mompov.com: Basically it's a clone of GDP but here the models happen to be women that are all at least late 20's but most are in their 40's and 50's. As the title implies. It's all shot POV style while GDP isn't. A major difference between this site and GDP is that the people responsible for this site know how to shoot a porn scene and you know who the woman is simply by looking at the preview section of the site. Bacroomcastingcouch.com: This one as the time implies involves a guy pretending to be a porn producer who entice girls to shoot for him as he is a gateway to better things. He offers to do a casting where he is the male performer. Most of the scenes involve anal but since he is alone then no dp and none of the other things as well. You do get some creampies and facials. The women who appear on his site are all amateurs and most never do anything else. Not sure if shooting for this tool had anything to do with it but it wouldn't exactly be a surprise if it did. Since he is alone than it's all POV but where Mompov knows how to shoot a scene like that. I have yet to see one scene where the guy fucks it up. That last sentence is why I wouldn't recommend this site. The women are sometimes quite attractive but the sex is almost never. The last one is called exploited college girls and is a sister site to backroom casting couch. Pretty much everything I wrote about that site applies here except that anal is on the extreme rare side of things. The other difference is that here the guy implies that the girls are collge students but that mostly all BS.
Nah, I don't really know any; I guess I shouldn't have implied that I do. FA is one that I knew, but it's really not my thing (very rarely does any of that kind of stuff appeal to me). Edit: well I do know that brokeamateurs has some gangbang scenes. I suppose that would count. The majority of their stuff seems to be 1-on-1 though, and I'm not sure they're "real" amateurs. Backroomcastingcouch is OK but the cinematography is pretty poor. Many times the camera cuts away for insertions which is a huge mistake in my book. Worse, many of the facials are only captured from cameras at a distance, a big let-down. But in concept, yeah that's what I'm interested in and I enjoy it, especially if it happens to be a good one. Although I'm not sure how much I believe that the girls really think they're "auditioning." But whatever. Will check the others out; I think I've seen a few of their respective offerings but not sure. MILFs aren't exactly my bag but I'm not opposed either. Edited by - mayotteru on 12/29/2014 2:11:08 AM
Well the day milf's become your thing than please take a look at mompov because their stuff is pretty good. Not that I wouldn't rather he have an actual camera operator but until he does then you have a decent pov porn site.
I think this is the site I just saw this scene recently girl was sucking a guys dick and the guy had skin hanging off his dick gross why would they even shoot this scene is beyond me. This might be one of the biggest turnoffs in straight porn I have ever seen
Now that I think about it is from Legalporno Edited by - DJboutit2 on 12/31/2014 5:40:22 PM
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Feb 3 2015 : 11:33PM
New Instagram preview: http://instagram.com/p/yqOsoYvAUS/ [mod edit: comment removed. See the ADT forum etiquette, 3rd paragraph.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 2/5/2015 10:42:07 PM
Many castings from Woodman are very hardcore (He calls them HardBed) and you can find similar material in Legal Porno, both with girls that are pretty new to the business.
Can anyone ID this E289 girl? I say next to Miss Palestine she has the baddest titties I've seen on their site. In this video she's doing two guys and she takes a good pound. I wonder if she has done other stuff too. [Image not found DB] [Image not found DB] [Image not found DB]
New website? You'll have to explain. Haven't been a member in a while, but if they finally updated and have released new videos at the same time I'll have to rethink that.
As someone who enjoys weird shit in porn, I'm actually curious as to which scene this is.
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Mar 4 2015 : 1:33PM
If you're a premium member, then yes.
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Mar 12 2015 : 10:31PM
This girl would do great on GirlsDoPorn: [mod edit: that seems to be a civilian who is not in porn or modeling, nor is she a celebrity of any type. Do not post random people's social media pages on a porn forum.] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 3/12/2015 10:39:38 PM
Everywhere Derp goes - Derp and "friends" -, stuff gets fucked up. Nice at the beginning, genius in the middle, than spiral down to a shit hole. The force is wicked with this one. We, the GDP dudes, can smell him miles away now, but you, ADT, might still need some "getting used to" time.
[Link]
Derp22 Deactivated User
396 Posts 8/14
Posted - Mar 20 2015 : 12:06AM
New BTS on GirlsDoPorn's [mod edit: name of tube site removed. Let's not encourage ppl to go to those sites.] page...with one of my favorite girls who sadly wont be returning according to the GDPTV guy cause she got outed before they got the chance to have her back. Edited by - killbillvol69 on 3/20/2015 12:25:19 AM
they've only released the deleted scenes from the episode (it's about 15 mins long). Havn't seen the full episode yet and not sure if they will release it. Apparently this was one of the girl's who got outed and she wasn't very happy about it.
^ They are but I think you have to be a member for over a month to get the 1080p versions. Something weird like that.
[Link]
NotAgain24 Deactivated User
8 Posts 4/15
Posted - Apr 25 2015 : 11:19PM
Mods - can we please start a general GDP discussion thread? Or at least change the name of this one to something other than "girlsdoporn is the worst..."
There was one anal scene, with a girl with a Reese Witherspoon thing goin' on at her chin n' jawline there. exploitedcollegegirls is where it's at. I had a membership and downloaded a load of the anal scenes so I have them saved. Some really good stuff. An anal scene with twins, an anal scene with this lass called.. Megan I think.. which was awesome. Some really hot anal with genuine non-porn girls which is great. I think it's actually pretty much in his MO to at least to try to get all the girls to do anal, some scenes have an anal tried and failed.. while others are proper anal scenes.
https://oo21oo.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/forward/ That was the girl with the Van Halen shirt, the link to it is on her public twitter. She posted it a few days ago when she was outed on IG and then deleted her IG account. Curious timing.
It's becoming more and more apparent that the people who run this site are flat out scum of the earth. Their recruiting seemed to be a thing of wonder but it's clear now they are as deceptive as they legally can be to coerce the women to shoot for them, then they have the gall to threaten legal action against anyone who goes so far as to criticize them. Do not support this site folks... I know porn is not an industry of high ethics but there's a line that has to be drawn.