Does anyone really think that these girls show up somewhere and suck off multiple cocks whose owners they've never scene? Of course not. But that's what we the producers want us to believe, and what we want, or are supposed, to believe when we're watching. But over and over again I see the verisimilitude of the scene ruined because the girl looks up, and obviously it's into the eyes of the guy she's blowing. The whole premise of her not knowing whose dick it is is, er, blown; even if we don't know whose dick it is, it's obvious that she does. If you're going to present it as a gloryhole scene, please try to make it somewhat credible.
I agree with most of what you say but I find that Glory Hole Swallow is different. Most stand-alone glory hole sites, or ones that are part of a network (Dog Fart has a couple) have a set built for the glory hole. I agree that it stretches the imagination too thin to think that in a controlled studio environment that the guys would be truly be anonymous. But Glory Hole Swallow does have a different feel to it. I haven't been a member there is a few years but the last time I had a membership there they filmed in real adult video shop with booths in the back. I agree that it is highly unlikely that any swinging dick who walked in could get his dick sucked. Controlling for something as simple as hygiene would be necessary let alone STDs. Gonorrhea can be transmitted to the throat. Also, what if they set up the cameras and no one showed up? But... of all the glory hole sites, I find that Glory Hole Swallow is the best for helping the viewer suspend his disbelief.
[Link]
lefaf Deactivated User
5776 Posts 10/14
Posted - Jan 15 2018 : 12:02PM
Pete Zaface,you re wrong on why look up during the bj.for example,for gloryholesecrets the girls look up at the camera.the scene can be sold twice with 2 angles.
I'll buy that, but if you're going to show two angles, make sure the side view doesn't have her looking up, because it sure looks like she's looking up at someone who's on the other side of a five-foot wall.
That's an excellent point. In fact, the site Glory Hole Secrets has two different versions of each scene. One is the camera down at the level of the action and the other is mounted on the ceiling. I'm guessing the model is directed to play to each camera. Presumably, the ceiling camera is a POV shot.
What makes it unrealistic to me is the guy having this enormous penis. The woman looks more in severe discomfort than in enjoyment, and the whole thing looks completely fake. I haven't seen them in years, but the scenes in 'Glory Hole Girlz' often looked quite realistic.
What kills gloryholes secrets is the technical incompetence ; the lazy cameraman thinks its a good idea to use the zoom function even though hes only a meter or so away from the action , plus hes so lazy hes usually sitting down so when the guuys bangs on the door that hes cumming the cameraman has to leap up with the camera jolting and shaking completely ruining it, plus of course the lights keep going out. They get some decent models and have a decent concept it just a shame they are so lackadaisical when it comes to technical quality. As others have said gloryholeswallow is much better , and thats just a guy with a camera but he seems to apply himself far more intelligently to the task than the guys at ghs.
I agree, sometimes I'm trying to zoom in and then he does and the camera goes in circles and almost get dizzy lol, definitely could not try so hard and let the viewers zoom as we want
hello, happy new year i hope your are ok in this cold days I have the intention to pay for a new scene from GHS store but I see two options HD and 4K My question is if HD would be at 1200 or 1980-1080 or better buy 4k
