oh yea... and starlets really seem to like/enjoy the way Tommy Gunn does them over.... Peter North is a legend too
[Link]
HornyBastard Deactivated User
41 Posts 3/10
Posted - Mar 31 2010 : 1:20AM
who is that girl in this pic. i know i've seen her before but i can't think of her name. and who is mark jewish? is that the name of a real person in the industry? LOL
What about super stud Jerry Butler? ....crickets..crickets.........crickets. OK OK...I was just kidding around with that one. Edited by - Winston on 2/5/2011 1:29:52 AM
Too funny. I liked Jerry way back when......... I like the fact that you thought of him. He was the stud at one point. Who's the stud now? Scott Nails? Mark Ashley? Nacho Vidal? Brandon Iron?
Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN 402 Posts 8/12
Posted - Aug 1 2012 : 1:36PM
Here is my listed 70's Ron Jeremy - John Leslie 80's Rocco Siffredi - Randy Spears 90's Evan Stone - Dale Dabone - Nacho Vidal - Manuel Ferrara - Mark Davis 2000's Xander Corvus
^ xander corvus, really? he's so boring. Plus he seems to only do features. I think manuel ferrara, Erik Everhard, Rocco Siffredi, and Lex Steele qualify.
Who is the greatest porn stud ever I have no idea its a bit like asking who is the greatest porn slut ever, because the same rules applies as it does to the ladies who do porn also. Few men in porn become as famous as the ladies who do it, those who do could be seen as the greatest porn studs I suppose. The criteria for my porn men is not his body, looks or penis size but how he performs with it, how fit he is. If he treats the female co star in the film to my liking he is great, whether he dominates her or submits to her does not bother me as long as he pleases her and me who watches the film. Also his verbal interaction with the girls and the girls verbal interaction is important to me, and I do not mean the screaming and the grunting.
I'll just run off some names that I'd put in my best male performers list of all-time in no particular order but grouped by decade or era. I'm basing my picks on combo of career longevity, fan popularity, volume and quality of performances. I'm not just picking guys because they did a ton of movies (e.g. Dave Hardman, Randy Spears) or just had a huge dick (e.g. Shane Diesel, Chris Charming, Julian). 70-80s . Ron Jeremy - the hedgehog, funny, could suck his own dick, most well known male star . John Leslie - original king of feature films, when pornstars could act . Joey Silvera - solid performer, good actor, funny, everybody loves him . Jamie Gillis - the original nasty man, extreme kink, good actor . John Holmes - not a big fan but he was the first monster dick star popular back then 80s-90s . Tom Byron - has probably fucked every big name female star ever . Peter North - the beer can, was a legend during his heyday . Rocco Siffredi - first big name euro male, helped Stagliano create gonzo market . Sean Michaels - first black/IR superstar, the safe black guy white girls like . John Dough - people forget he was the original first male feature contract star 90s-00s . Steve Holmes - reincarnation of Jamie Gillis, extreme hardcore euro stuff, kink.com, etc . Manuel Ferrara - not one of my favs but the fans love him . Lex Steele - king of IR . Mr Marcus - prince of IR . Mandingo - boring but giant black dick + white girls = big sales (ask Jules Jordan) . Evan Stone - dominated feature films, great actor, funny and fucked a lot of feature stars For the current era? I'd start with James Deen and Prince Yashua. If I had to pick one single guy as the best of all-time? I'd have to pick Rocco with Peter North as close runner-up. Rocco did more variety of women and types of scenes than North and I deducted some points for North doing gay movies. During prime Rocco was the man. Just my 2 cents Edited by - zambi on 8/1/2012 8:49:18 PM Edited by - zambi on 8/1/2012 8:57:02 PM
There are no adult film awards for men, the way there are adult film awards for women. Which makes it hard for porn fans to agree on which guy is better than another. But a good clue about how to decide is the adult film awards for women. Most of those awards are for specific scenes in specific films and in a specific porn genre. Nobody is best at everything. But many people are best at doing this or that in porn in any given year. And just because someone is best one year, doesn't necessarily mean that he or she is best for ever and ever. Next year, someone might be better than the best of the previous year.
Interesting choices with interesting opinions. To me the best male pornstars have a combination of looks, personality, stamina, fucking ability, consistency, and acting. Few, IMHO, really have all qualities.
this is easy Rocco by far revolutionary guy in porn, second PETER NORTH considering size, amount of cum, longevity. Lexington is an average performer with huge dick, his scenes suck especially since he adopted that scream when he comes, besides he can not hold it hard more more than minute, to mention Mr Marcus is ridiculous that guy is limp 90% of the time, i guess they hire him out of pity.
Heterosexual porn films always focus on the lady and not on the guy. Which means that you need to evaluate the guy in terms of the visible and audible reactions he evokes from the pretty lady, rather than anything else. Because that's what you get to see in the film. No heterosexual porn film is going to boast on its cover that the fucking guy is very good at keeping his erection and has a lot of stamina. Such focusing on the guy would be appropriate only in a homosexual porn film. Heterosexual porn films focus on the lady and not on the guy. It's the female sexual prowess that these film emphasize, such as the lady having anal sex with a guy (which not every lady can do well), or taking on two guys at the same time for a DP or even a DAP, or taking a gang-bang from several guys. That's the kind of boasts you see on the cover of heterosexual porn films. They focus on the lady. Guys in heterosexual porn should be evaluated according to how well they enable the pretty lady display her sexual prowess to the viewer. Because it's the woman and not the guy that heterosexual porn films focus on. And in terms of making the woman's sexual performance look impressive to the viewer, Manuel Ferrara is one of the best. Because not only does he have a big cock, but he bangs so hard and so fast the asses of his sexy lasses that it's hard to believe it, unless you see it with your own eyes. The difference between Manuel Ferrara and many other porn studs is that Manuel Ferrara's cock is uncircumcised. His loose skin around the cock reduces friction for the lady, which is what enables his pretty lady endure such a hard and fast anal fuck from him. A circumcised cock, without the loose skin, produces a lot more friction for the lady. Which is what prevents the circumcised guy from banging his lady's ass as hard and as fast as Manuel Ferrara does. The circumcised guy would wreck the lady's ass and send her to the hospital, if he tries to bang her ass as hard and as fast as Manuel Ferrara does. Edited by - Dan on 8/4/2012 10:51:57 AM
I think you took what I said in the wrong way. And to be honest, I believe the women "drive" scenes way more than the men...that's me though. I simply go by what "I" see. Nothing homosexual about it. Whether the guy is supposed to have the qualities i mentioned is unmaterial to me, to me they simply do. I think Manuel is a perfect example actually, although I think he's somewhat overrated. I think he has almost everything, if not everything, I mentioned. Not every woman appears to be able to take his size comfortably though, and I have seen him in scenes I thought didn't work. I think he's pretty consistent though. Allowing the women to display her sexual prowess does include releasing some control, some of the time. IMO.
Again I think you misinterpret what I'm saying. Being assertive and aggressive doesn't automatically equate to being masculine to me, although in modern porn I think it often is. That actually does very little for me. I mean if a woman can enjoy herself that way or can simply endure it, more power to her. I simply enjoy watching sex that is mostly mutually expressive and enjoyed. Doesn't matter to me who has most of the control, as long as the women has some or exerts some. I've said it before in many places---I don't watch porn to watch women be submissive. I know I'm in the minority. Edited by - aplus on 8/12/2012 1:51:45 AM
^ Who is in control is a matter of personal taste, but I think a lot of porn makes too much out of it. The best scenes are where both the guy and the woman have some control and feel free to do it the way they like. Because when people feel free to behave naturally, then their actions and their sex looks and actually is more sincere and more genuine. I like to see the fucking guy in dominant positions not because these positions are dominant but because they are the best for deeper, harder, and faster fuck for the lady. A guy usually fucks harder and better than a woman does. And that's why the cowgirl position, where the woman fucks the guy, doesn't do much for me. Of course, the guy can fuck from below in the cowgirl position. But I like to see anal sex for the lady with a good view of her pussy, and I don't get to see much of her pussy when the guy goes inside her ass in the cowgirl position. Not being able to see the lady's pussy during her anal ride is a big negative for me. But I do want to see the pretty lady have enough freedom and control to masturbate her own pussy during her anal sex with a guy. And I don't like to see her slapped around or restrained in some way, because this makes me doubt whether she is enjoying her sex with the guy or not. Edited by - Dan on 8/12/2012 7:55:10 AM
Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN 402 Posts 8/12
Posted - Aug 12 2012 : 11:46AM
You are right Xander Corvus and Randy Spears are boring at sex, but the reason I pick them is because Xander Corvus and Randy Spears are very good at acting
Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN 402 Posts 8/12
Posted - Aug 18 2012 : 2:55PM
I am going to add one more to my List. I have not seen any videos he has been in only the trailer's, but that ive seen of Richie Brain/Calhoun in the trailer's, I think Richie Brain/Calhoun is the best male porn actor I have ever seen.
Mark Ashley all the way. Honorable mentions Mark Wood Keiran Lee Voodoo Kid Jamaica Ian Scott Bill Bailey Alan Stafford Sean Michaels Michael Stefano Will Powers Peter North Mr.Marcus Jenner Pat Myne (he is so into it)
The ones I really dislike with reasons Steve Holmes - fucks well but is extremely obnoxious - forced kissing, stupid grin and then tries to sit on girls faces (wtf?, see Krissy Lynn's DP scene with Mr.Pete and Holmes) Alex Gonz - oh God, zero situational awareness, looks completely uninterested and then would start choking and acting all weird while his cock luks like a lump of foreskin or a newborn's leg. And he is in so many non-gonzo movies when he couldn't even utter a word, forget the acting part!
If you are a porn fan, the guys who are invisible give the best performances which is why Mark Ashley just rocks. The moment you start noticing guys because of their obnoxiousness is what ruins scenes for me. I have actually avoided two Elegant Angel series which I have collected in the past just because of Gonz's weird behavior.
[Link]
mikesalami Deactivated User
1505 Posts 7/10
Posted - Aug 20 2012 : 8:38PM
I was just gonna post Mark Ashley too. He's got a big cock (although not too massive to cause pain), which he can actually get fully hard. He seems to legitimately get girls off, through foreplay as well as fucking. And most importantly he doesn't fuck like a wild animal. Nice solid slow or semi-fast fucking which doesn't fuck up the aesthetics of the scene (I'm very into good angles, etc lol). A) Number of video credits? Tons. B) Number of babes landed? Tons. C) Cock size? Big but not too big. D) Stamina? Never seen him cum early. E) Volume of semen per load? Volume is ok, but it never shoots out (just sort of falls out). I suppose that would be one minor complaint about him. Other mentions: Mike Adriano Kid Jamaica Lexington Steele Peter North Jordan Ash Sledge Hammer
rocco is the best. 2 - nacho and manuel 4 - james deen
[Link]
QuivverSoftly Deactivated User
53 Posts 6/10
Posted - Aug 22 2012 : 4:43AM
I can't whittle down to one so i'm going to give you my favorite three in no particular order. Steve Holmes - For his strong performances, his more then passable acting ability and the fact he sometimes make me laugh (either intentionally or because of his comedic timing) Manuel Ferrara - Strong performers, his ability to shut the fuck up during the scene and the fact he isn't repulsive to look at (no homo). James Deen - Intensity, strong performance and more then decent acting ability. Also seems to bring out the best in the girl he's working with.
I think Justin Slayer is the king right now.He brings it and fucks girls hard in every scene.Sometimes cumming two or three times in the same scene while directing and making hot scenes.Before Justin it was definitely Rocco during his buttman era.LT brings it also but I pick Justin over him because I think Justin has more chemistry with the girls and it seems like it shows in scenes.If he isn't the man then why are his porn movies some of the most expensive to buy? Edited by - doboy1 on 8/22/2012 2:10:26 PM
People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11
Posted - Sep 23 2012 : 2:30PM
I agree, all accurate points. Many Male Porn Stars can be very annoying or do things that can kill a scene. Never saw that with Peter North. One other point, there is no other Male Porn Star I have seen that can consistently make the women cream. No one else comes close.
Before the Internet: Rocco. The current Internet Era: Manuel Ferrara. It's not even close. Natasha Nice said that he is the only performer to make her cum during the filming of a scene. Ask Kaiya Lynn who the biggest stud is. Manuel Ferrara owns every single asian pornstar he has ever fucked, which goes a long way with me towards understand who The Man is, since I think asian pornstars are, overall, the hottest subset of pornstars. London Keys - London fucking Keys - called him "God." Peter North is a sideshow and always will be. Tori Welles used to make fun of him to his face.
"1 fan of the best pussy licker on Earth!" 29 Posts 10/12
Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 5:30AM
Prime Mark Davis 1995-2000 was easily on everyone's "favorite" list. Every scene he was in during that streak had real, genuine, female orgasms. Good girth un his uncut cock which seemed to get every lady OFF in cowgirl.And the best pussy licker in the business. Check out his scene w Christy Canyon from Sex Secrets of a Mistress. She is literally overwhelmed.
Mike Salami: Peter North is a sideshow because every scene he has ever been in has always been about his fucking "load," and how big it's going to be, and how far it's going to travel, and yadda yadda. It's always been about him and his load, and never about the girls. And as far as Tori Welles goes, she used to tease him about how he fucked, telling him to fuck her harder, asking him if he was a little girl (because he was fucking her so slow), and one time, even calling him a fag for not being able to give her the goods. She seemed to have his number from the beginning. I just get sick and tired of people saying Peter North is one of the all-time great studs. He had a big dick and one trick (one-man bukkake) and that was it, and I thought the trick was kind of gross.
Peter North is attractive, great body, nice rock-hard cock, and never failed with the pop shot. And he never treats a girl like a piece of meat (guys who slap or choke girls during sex have self-esteem issues, IMO). Peter is the #1 stud of all time, bar none. I've seen Mr. Marcus mentioned in more than one post. Even ignoring the syphilis incident, he still doesn't deserve honorable mention. I've seen too many scenes where takes forever to get wood.
Well I voted for him but I agree on the part that "all time greatest stud" is a meaningless term anyway. As for looks, people have different tastes, and there are some guys that I just can't stand to watch that others like, so no one will be liked by everyone. As for his dick and cumshot, I think its is really hard to argue against him in that sense. His dick is simply just big and straight with no distracting features and thats why its perfect for porn. His cumshot is indeed legendary, and I doubt you'll find many agree with your disapproval of that. That is a "trick" I'd like to see a lot more of in porn.
Erik Everhard, been in the biz for so many years, seems to love women not just abusing them, hung and always hard. Edited by - geralt on 11/13/2012 12:47:59 PM
[Link]
cantholdmedown Deactivated User
Charming, right ladies? 166 Posts 4/12
Posted - Nov 14 2012 : 7:05AM
Yep MF's phimosis is gross, you would have thought with his immense wealth he would have gotten that fixed by now. It brings Dan's stories about why girls have such a fun time with him into doubt. Because especially speaking as an uncut male myself I know that we have to retract the foreskin the whole way for fucking and semi-unretracted is just... vile. On topic, I'd have to say the MA twins, Mark Ashley and Mike Adriano are up there. Mark is incredible because of his seamless, completely selfless "blend into the background yet still do the business" style, while Adriano has made his mark on the porn industry with his own genre and seriously hot chemistry with the girls. Note that load shooting ability factors nothing into my viewpoint here; it matters less than zero to me.
[Link]
erik2690 Deactivated User
367 Posts 3/12
Posted - Nov 14 2012 : 5:52PM
Dude, cantholdmedown. You don't have to rely on "Dan's stories" about girls liking Manuel. Listen to a porn girl do a podcast or read an interview. Manuel's name comes up more frequently than anyone. Not always, of course, there are various answers. On the whole though Manuel gets brought up most often. Porn watchers not liking Manuel is fine. That's personal preference, but as far as the girls liking to work with him, the evidence is all over the web for you to see. From most of what Ive seen/heard/read the people in porn (performers, directors, etc.) like him as a person and performer. My opinion is probably clear, I think he is a top notch performer. However, I truly don't think that makes my analysis of how he is viewed by other performers any less valid. I haven't really ever heard bad things and have heard many good things. Sorry for the long-winded post. Edited by - erik2690 on 11/14/2012 5:53:50 PM
[Link]
cantholdmedown Deactivated User
Charming, right ladies? 166 Posts 4/12
Posted - Nov 14 2012 : 7:09PM
I was specifically referring to the logical fallacy of Dan's assumption that Manuel's phimosis (an unnatural state for a penis to be in) is either a common occurrence among uncut men and/or a major reason as to why he's able to get the girls off. I've never denied that he's capable of such, much as I'd like to. But it has surely gone too far when even his custom moulded dildo has its own phimosis... yuck (heh).
[Link]
erik2690 Deactivated User
367 Posts 3/12
Posted - Nov 14 2012 : 8:22PM
cantholdmedown, I better understand your point now. Although, I do find it odd (not wrong just odd) that this feature of his anatomy hits you in such a negative way and yet not his co-stars, at least for the most part. Not trying to devalue your opinion. I just find it interesting. I have seen many of his scenes and this feature never stood out to me as bad or gross. Interesting how the mind works. I could see how it could potentially create less friction, which could be a positive for the female performer. I have no facts for this though. Anyway, glad I understand your point better. Have a good day.
Mark Ashley @ Adult Empire
Posted - Mar 29 2010 : 7:57PM
