I have the second one with Jasmin St Clair and you have to be a hardcore gangbang fan to enjoy it. I bought it on VHS years ago simply out of curiosity. I also bought Candy Apples Busted at 742 (a very similar title) for the same reasons.
These movies pretty much have no 'erotic' value whatsoever. The girls usually seem to be there to do the job and get the paycheck rather than enjoying good sex. The guys in them are usually ugly, having won magazine competitions etc to be there, or they paid their entry fee for the only sex they have had and are likely to for years.
The movies go for quite some time, but after you have seen the first ten minutes you have basically seen the whole thing.
So if you want to see what they are about, go for it. If you are looking for a decent sex gangbang where the girls appear to be enjoying themselves with half presentable guys I suggest you check out the Gangbang girl series from Anabolic.
Thats my two cents.
[Link]
Druber Deactivated User
187 Posts 9/02
Posted - Sep 19 2002 : 6:26AM
Years and years back I bought the Annabel Chong 252-record for the same reasons and if one movie ever disgusted me, it was that one. No heat, nothing at all.
Now I do just wonder: Who holds the Wold Gangbang Record anyway? (I dont wanna see it, just wanna know)
I'm looking a long time now for the 2nd part with Jasmin St. Clair, but I heard that it's no longer produced by Metro. So if anyone of you guys will sell his copy to me please mail to dvd_freak@gmx.de !
I've seen Part 2 with Jasmine St. Claire and I pretty much agree with all that's been said. If you've seen 10 minutes, you've seen the whole thing and it just goes on and on.
The guys wear condoms, but occasionally take them off and come on her torso. Immediately, a latex gloved hand shows up to wipe away the spunk and disinfect the area. What a turnoff!
But I do have a question: I remember hearing somewhere that in Part 1, 70 guys spew their loads all over Annabel Chong, and she pretty much "bathes" in it. Is this true?
Regardless, I'm surprised that these titles are so hard to get a hold of these days. You can still find certain porn films from the 80's, but not these for some reason.
Maybe this pic is from the final cumshot at the annabel gangbang.
[Link]
Druber Deactivated User
187 Posts 9/02
Posted - Sep 20 2002 : 6:53AM
No. It is some japaneese production. I tried to watch it once, but it was VERY boring. Lame, small dicks, no anal, no heat at all. The picture you posted, which is also on the video cover, actually is the best part of it.
Annabel Chong might actually have taken 70 cum-shots in the first film alltogether, but after each 10 or so she was wiped clean. Just another turn down.
Druber
[Link]
Druber Deactivated User
187 Posts 9/02
Posted - Sep 20 2002 : 6:57AM
There is this Polish porn actress, Klaudia Figura, who claimes to have beaten that record at 646 studs.
...but if I remember well Sabrina Johnson claimed to have done 2000 over Silvester in two days.
Yeah, that pic is definitely not from the John T Bone production. I think Metro quit distributing some of these, why I don't know.
I saw the Sabrina Johnson one, and 2000 seems an extremely inflated number. I noticed some of the same guys recycling through the line several times, so it was probably more like 200. At the most.
[Link]
paraglider Deactivated User
44 Posts 9/01
Posted - Sep 20 2002 : 11:20AM
The new record from Poland was on UK televison last week on the EuroTrash program. Being mainstream TV no action was shown, but the suggestion was there were 200 men there recyling round three women, spending no more than 1 minute at a time on each, using condoms. Three women, because it was a competition.
You know, they've got some very fuzzy math going on in calculating these totals. Apparently, one "insertion" is counted as a full number. That's one stroke, one pump.
Then they say "Oh yeah, there was only 70 guys, but they went three times each, so that's 210." So if she was ridden hard to climax 3 times each by each guy, I could see it count. But if one "insertion" counts, who's to say what really qualifies as a fuck?
All in all, I get a lot more enjoyment out of the Anabolic Gangbang Girl series. There's about 10 guys that do it right.
I have seen the Jasmine and Houston ones and like everyone else so far I thought they both were pretty much unerotic and kind of boring. It is pretty sad but I was probably more turned on when they would panned over to the fluffing action rather seeing 5 guys swiveling Houston around and getting their 30 seconds of boring sex.
[Link]
Planet Sex Deactivated User
1951 Posts 6/01
Posted - Sep 21 2002 : 1:01AM
All those gangbangs are fake. It´s not as if the girl was actually banged by 600 men. She was banged 600 TIMES during a certain period, and that´s a completely different "body count".
On the other side, male gangbangs like the "World´s Luckiest Man" series are more legit.
..... will there be pain that I can not explain what's coming over me if I start to resist please don't use your fist or I might need some surgery
