All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 502 > Her First Anal Sex - Is It For Real?
AuthorPost
mediasmarts2
Member

306 Posts
8/06
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 7:21AM
There is a series of movies by Pink Visual Productions titled "Her First Anal Sex." I'm interested in these, but am wondering whether they are comps or are filmed for the first time? For example, #9 has Hillary Scott and was released in 2006. Unless its a comp of an earlier scene (from herfirstanalsex.com?), they are definitely lying.
So do these movies actually have the first anal sex scenes of the actresses in them? Or are they just lying?
Also, are there any other series specifically focused on featuring the first anal scenes of women?
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 10:56AM
The DVD's contain scenes shot for the web site.
As for whether or not the scenes are actually the performers' first anal sex on camera, I don't know, nor do I care. They certainly aren't the first time these gals have had anal sex, so what's the big deal?
LubeNLuv
Senior Member

1854 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 11:29AM
Mediasmart, I notice from your posts that you have a rather narrowly-defined set of preferences, which is fine...it's your porn $$ after all. But since you seem to like very specific things, I think you'd do yourself a big favor if you would "suspend your doubts" about the authenticity of porn.
Porn is a performance. Some performers are VERY good at acting out a scene, some aren't. Some orgasms are real, but there are so many ways to fake one on both sides. Editing, etc can do even more to reinforce realism. At the end of the day, you've NO WAY to know for sure what's real and what is just a performance.
So rather than worry about it....just go with it. If it's real to you, the performers have done their jobs well and that's all that matters. If you stop to consider that porn is a paid gig, then you start to get hung up in the fact that all scenes are scripted, scheduled, contracted, actors are tested, etc. If the girl looks 18 and the box says "18 and horny," why bother with asking for proof? Just go with it....it can really enhance your enjoyment to NOT want authenticity. Because in porn, if you are seeking authentic, I'm afraid you'll be more disappointed than not.
As for first anals, I think it's fairly unlikely that anyone is going to have their first anal sex scene filmed for the masses. At the very least, there's a bunch of prep work that goes into it first...enema's, toys, working up to larger toys, then finally a male thrusting penis. But it's certainly possible it's the first time the girl in question has been FILMED doing an anal....just highly unlikely it's her first anal experience EVER and they just happened to film it.
Just go with the illusion....I'm of the mind that it's far more enjoyable than trying to find authenticity.
bigfoot
Senior Member

1295 Posts
7/06
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 11:40AM
I'm in agreement. Like it or not, life is about Marketing your product . A DVD having "First Time" in the title or on the DVD cover is going to attract a certain segment who enjoys the "fantasy" that this is the first time that so&so is doing such&such.
I stopped going after "first anal" scenes after watchinhg "I've Never Done That Before #8" which shows Daisy Marie's ONLY filmed/released anal scene. Sounds good, right? Despite more ink on a body than I normally like, IMHO she is one of the beauties in today's top tier adult releases. However, back when this scene was filmed in 2002, the lighting was absolutely horrid and as a result, her breasts, ass, inner thighs, outer thighs, etc., were totally covered in stretch marks. Now they may be there, but I've never seen them before and I have watched Daisy in dozens of movies over the years.
As I'm not into granny-porn, this scene did nothing for me. Yes, it is the only scene showing her getting fucked in the ass, which was the reason I bought and still own it. Yet, I doubt I will ever play it again. The other scenes were equally bad but with unattractive women - the guy's dick is only about four inches erect AND he has trouble maintaining an erecdtion - the ratio of time focusing on Daisy's strecth-marked-ass to face time is something like 20-to-1.
It was then that that "FIRST TIME ANAL" became irrelavent. I've been tempted since then, so I rented rather than buying initially. Sometimes, the title is decent (like Carmen Luvana's 1st&ONLY anal in "Perfect Secretary") and sometimes no so much (ala Devon's "Intoxicated" which includes some of my favorites like Sammie Rhodes and Marlena).
To sum up - first, second, tenth - it doesn't matter. I want hot sex scenes that get a rise out of me. Otherwise, I'm wasting my time.
Edited by - bigfoot on 7/7/2007 11:42:02 AM
jnkns
Member

14 Posts
5/07
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 1:47PM
media....i agree with the others.
and i don't know if you've ever fucked a real-live woman in the ass for the first time, but it's not something that they would want on film. it's a slow process the first time, and everytime after that to be honest.
my guess would be there are very few, if any women you'll see in adult films who haven't had their prune popped long before they do it on set.
 
PL
Senior Member

God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer
1726 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 3:09PM
As a reviewer, these titles annoy me. I don't flow with the illusion of this being her first time ass fucked, and anyone honestly thinking that, may need to re-think it a little considering the act itself.
With that said, I'm perfectly accepting of "her first anal" when it's on a box cover, but usually that's referring to a first-time-on-camera deal vs. first time ever.
I don't know, maybe I'm way off base. I'm going to keep my eye on the thread to see how it pans out. I feel as if I'm holding some sort of double standard here, but the one of the last covers I seen has the one mediasmarts2 see, with Hillary - POST boob job; meaning a flat out lie.
Some say we'll see armageddon soon. I certainly hope we will. - Tool
LubeNLuv
Senior Member

1854 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 3:21PM
I dunno guys...porn is an entertainment venue, not documentaries. It seems a bit strange to me to EXPECT anything that you see as being real. It's a nice surprise when it appears to be real, or is even portrayed here on the boards by the performers as being real...remembering Mia Rose talking about one of her first anal scenes on film with Manuel, for example.
But then again, I'm not one who thinks that much when watching porn. I'm not watching it for the intellectual stimulation....but something much more carnal instead.
LubeNLuv
Senior Member

1854 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jul 6 2007 : 3:47PM
Speaking of this topic, here's something I'd like to see more of in the "first" porn series that exist out there (First anal, first DP, first time amateur hardcore, first whatever).
Use a split screen for the opening penetration shot. One of the reasons I enjoy watching amateur porn is because the female talent seldom knows she's supposed to making a "rapture" face for the entire shot. She's not yet honed her "o face" if you will. So she looks nervous, a bit timid, sometimes scared, surprised, whatever....and it shows on her face IF THE DAMN CAMERA GUY SHOWS US THAT.
Instead, what happens in almost all the cases is we get a closeup of the penetration itself. Then by the time the camera pans back up to her face, it's like any other normal porn scene.
Some good examples of what I like can be seen in many of the b/g vids over at Karups Home Amateurs, for example. The girls are watching the insertion intently (assuming they are in missionary) and in many cases, they bite their lower lip, they giggle nervously, they roll their eyes back, some show a bit of nervousness...and yes, I've seen a little pain sometimes also...which I most assuredly do NOT like, but it is at least an apparently authentic response.
Let me stress that I don't want to see a woman who is not enjoying herself, either for real or "in character," on screen. But in real life, sex for a woman can be a bit uncomfortable while she adjusts to the size of the cock, especially if she isn't that experienced. If pornographers REALLY want to improve on the realism factor, they'd show this kind of shy nervousness on film, either via full body shots that include the face and/or split screen for the initial penetration.
There's a website for HD porn out there that does this right now...I've seen some of their stuff and it's a novel approach to porn.
bigfoot
Senior Member

1295 Posts
7/06
Posted - Jul 7 2007 : 11:59AM
Brilliant! I LOVE THIS IDEA! Are there any DVD's out there that currently does this? If so, I'm buying it immediately. Lining up the face and penetration gives depth and reality to what would otherwise be a normal ass-fucking.
It's a shame that more gonzo doesn't involve the BTS in the actual presented scene. Two titles that immediately come to mind are "Up Your Ass 22" and "Cytherea's Anal Whores" -In UYA22, there is a BTS that involves a very yound Teagan doing her first enema prior to her scene. She said she'd only had sex with three boys before this shoot. Her naiveté is charming & intoxicating. I would have loved to have seen that in the actual scene rather than in the BTS.
In "Cytherea's Anal Whores", the BTS spends quite a bit of time with her starting off with a small dildo up her ass. Angela Stone was there helping her work progressively larger toys in her ass. Cytherea seemed pretty miserable...or focused - it could be either. Eventually, she positions herself with the guys dick and slowly works it in it takes some time and she is still either miserable or focused . Once she makes some progress, the BTS segment ends. In her actual anal scene, it starts right where the BTS ended - with the guys dick ALREADY IN HER ASS!
If all you are looking for is straight sex, by all means, there are virtually tens of thousands of titles outthere that will give you that. For me, I like the build up. In a business where everything is staged, it is GREAT to see those moments that are real - or at least seem real. For me, that is worth the price of admission!
Pocketcomb_Pimp
Deactivated User

1921 Posts
7/03
Posted - Jul 7 2007 : 12:11PM
Nothing real about it.
mrdngm
Member

754 Posts
11/04
Posted - Jul 8 2007 : 7:39AM
Looking at the boxcovers of that series, it seems that at least some of the performers are well-known pornstars. But if it's anything like other Pink Visuals lines, they may not all be pornstars. I've seen a few volumes of 'Her First Lesbian Sex' and it's a mixed bag of pornstars and unknowns. That doesn't mean that it's their "first time" doing whatever but maybe it's their first time on camera, which is something...
Tommy Kaye
Member

135 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jul 10 2007 : 6:08PM
I can't speak for the company in question..... They need to respond themselves. Myself, I have shot many, many first time anal girls. They are usually very new to the business. Could I create a whole series of real first time anal? I doubt it... I never, and I mean never, fake anything.... it is or it isn't. Pretty simple. A lot of people in this business operate on the smoke and mirrors principal. I don't.



Jump To: