I don't think so.

[Link]

678char

[Link]

I think the VAST majority of "straight" porn consumers want to see the boys fucking the girls. Is this really a concept we now have to defend?

I'M ALL FOR STRAP-ON SCENES!
However, it is a niche preference.
Make strap-on genre lines to your heart's content.
Just be sure to clearly label the product so that consumers have no doubt what they are getting.
PLEASE don't waste my porn dollar by inserting girl-fucking-boy-with-strap-on material in mainstream "straight" porn.

[Link]

Edited by - threesomebody on 2/12/2006 9:51:22 AM

[Link]

Getting waaaay off topic now.

[Link]

I'm sure there are exceptions, but as a rule its flat fee.

[Link]

For women is even more dangerous because if the actors aren't very skilled they may hurt an actress and even make some bleeding opening a way to actresses own bacteria

[Link]

never thought at all for any other DAP or DVP I saw

Ok this is a lesson

Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 2/12/2006 1:37:22 PM

[Link]

Just like a lot of people don't count toys as being the real thing in g/g scenes,I think the same rule should apply to toys in FTM anal scenes too. It's all a matter of stimulation, not sexuality.

xoxo
Devinn

[Link]

is like the 40 guys who pop on the chick after one guy humps her in bakers dozen or bukakke guys are mopes (usually)

it people you would not book to do a full scene as they are not usually established talent but for a hundred bucks they provide an extra pop

[Link]

it's more than this i think , to me being penetrated is very uncomfortable even when my girl do that with a finger , it doesn't matter if my wood become ticker (my girl says so)it ceases the fun for me (well almost), I accept because of her , she likes it but it's not my favourite thing

your equation is too simple but at least makes something clear.

Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 2/12/2006 2:14:13 PM

[Link]

...which is probably what the c-note is meant to account for.

Edited by - Endless Loop on 2/12/2006 4:12:40 PM

[Link]

How this people accept to do this stuff it's a mistery probably someone told them : do you like to shot in a porn movie for 100 bucks? and they : Straight? and then: Yes, here is your contract please sign down there.
At the set: ok boys the actor will fuck whereas YOU masturbate and then jerk off on the actress, but beware you must aim well and obviously you ABSOLUTELY MUST cum when I'll order you to do so , right? any question?
Ok let's go and remember don't even try to cum before nedeed.

Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 2/12/2006 5:21:38 PM

[Link]

Edited by - AztecGold11 on 2/12/2006 5:57:06 PM

[Link]

How much time i rented movie to see that the scene with the girl why i rented the movie was a G/G...aaaaaaarg thats what i was saying...so i prefer personally that G/G stuff is in G/G movie only.

As for a Bukkake scene...well im not sure if i could do that, there a risk catching some cum of another guy...yurk, and its a big turnoff to see all these guy doing it naked all over you. In a 4 man gangbang at least you can focus on the girl and she do stuff for you, but a bukkake basically you see guy jerking and masturbating all around for only a 30 sec of fun jerking on the girl

[Link]

So to me, all the double vag/double anal stuff is lame. I thought it was bad when during a normal DP, a guy's balls would slap against the other guy.

How do performer's rationalize that? Like in their head they're saying, "Okay, I'm gonna be rubbing my dick against another guy's dick. I'm just gonna close my eyes and hope for the best."

I remember seeing a Diabolic or Anabolic film where it was a girl and three guys (one guy was Brian Surewood). The guys start in with the double vag, and the camera pans over to the side, and there is Surewood. Arms folded, shaking his head and he looks in the camera and says, "Fags!"

[Link]

Rocco Siffredi/ Jean Yves Le Castel (DAP with Sabrina Johnson)
Sean Michaels / Mark Davis (DVP Chloe)
Ron Jeremy/Lots of guys (DAP Tammi Ann , DAP-DVP TP Annabel Chong)
Lexington Steele/Mr Marcus (DAP Aurora Snow)
Erik Everhard /Jay Ashley (DAP Aurora Snow)
Erik Everhard/Jay Ashley/Pat Mayne (TP Aurora Snow)

BTW if in a orgy 20 girl and 2 men you took away the girls then it's gay?

[Link]

To me, DAPs do have a touch of gayness to them.
No matter how much the girl's pained expression may divert attention from the core act of two guy rubbing their dicks against each other, that is what they're doing.
To each their own.

But regardless of what the girl may shove up the guy's ass, a scene with one guy and one girl can't really be at all gay IMHO.

[Link]

Then again, these guys seem to be secure enough in their sexulality that they don't really give a damn what a few people think as they happily screw girls like Aurora Snow and cash their cheques for doing so.

To take it to an extreme, why are you jacking off looking at m/f sex? you're whacking off while there's a hard cock on the screen. Sounds a bit gay to me.

Or when you're wanking yourself, that's a guy's hand on your dick. That's like, totally, the definition of gay, right?

..right?

[Link]

Seriously, thanks. That "OMG! GAY!" talk just gets really annoying.

[Link]

As for the strap on thing. Well, yes, the man is being penetrated, but by a woman. This works for the man since the dildo is hiting his prostate which heightens sexual pleasure, and it also works for him if he likes getting dominated. The whole point of a female to male strap on scene is that its femdom. The female is dominating the male, and the female is a very active and important part of the equation for the male. Without the female it isn't the same.

So I guess any guy who ever got off on that whole finger up the asshole during a blow job thing is gay to? Cause I have to tell you, just because the guy's ass is involved doesn't make him gay. It just matters if the person doing things to the guy's ass is male.

And Trannie videos... well... those are kind of gay, but also boderline bisexual (the mix of female and male).

You also are all basing sexuality on the old catagory system. The modern day psychological view of sexuality is a spectrum. As in, while you can be fully straight and fully gay, a good portion of the population fall into the middle ground, and yet not entirely bisexual. Get with the times guys.

*Oh, and male performers are usually just payed one fee for any act. The only time their pay is raised is if they are in... dun dun dun... GAY PORN! Yep. The only way male talent can get a good deal more money is to either become a major name like Randy Spears or Peter North, or do it with a guy.

[Link]

But as for the following:

Back on topic: didn't Lockwood get paid a lot for getting pegged in Devinn's movie? If it's not because of the act, does this mean he's an A-list star now? Discuss.

[Link]

Edited by - chaotic_23 on 2/15/2006 6:32:50 AM

[Link]

Like I said, not really the case here.

With Kurt Lockwood... well, as far as male talent goes... he is actually pretty A list. He's worked with a ton of different companies, and although is reputation is sometimes less than stellar when it comes to his private life (who knows what of that is true), on camera he has proven himself to be an excellent woodsman. Plus, most people know who he is, and when it comes to couples videos expecially, he is someone that women don't mind watching.

For the strap on... I'm suprised that he got so much. This isn't the first time a girl has fooled around with his ass. In his second scene of Neu Wave Hookers Naomi Zen is back there for most of the scene. If I remember correctly he got rimmed and fingered.

[Link]

At the end of the day it all comes down to promotion and dollars and cents. That's what this biz lives on.

xoxo
Devinn

[Link]

If I was to dp a girl with one of my friends or something, I wouldnt be like, ye man I fucked u, it would be, ye man we fucked her.

each there own of course ._.

[Link]