This is more of a feature side discussion so this thread'll probably be moved over there for the sake of neatness . Don't take offence .
I've not seen Housewives either , though I've rarely been disapointed by Wicked's stuff .
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Ben Member 7 Posts 11/04 |  Posted - Nov 20 2004 : 2:30PMAnyone seen this or seen any reviews posted? We (my wife & me) have found Wicked productions to be well done and very graphic <g> hmmmm 'activity'.... Ben Topic Moved by - hardware on Nov 20 2004 [Link] |
| Lee O Forearm Trainer mmmmmmm........ after-birth 1193 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Nov 20 2004 : 3:38PM This is more of a feature side discussion so this thread'll probably be moved over there for the sake of neatness . Don't take offence . I've not seen Housewives either , though I've rarely been disapointed by Wicked's stuff . [Link] |
| Zoid Senior Member Boobies and Anal 2004 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Nov 20 2004 : 6:44PM [Link] |
| devinnlane Devinn Lane 429 Posts 1/04 | Posted - Nov 20 2004 : 10:01PM
[Link] |
| ObiBong Senior Member 1162 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 2:29AM I also had several nitpicks on the sex scenes. The lighting sometimes varied too widely in different shots during the same scene ... I noticed more than once that the wide shots would be much brighter, or different in tone, than the closeups. Also, there were some noticeable softcore shots strewn in among the hardcore. I don't mind when scenes have softcore moments (they can be pretty), but I don't like to see shots that are self-consciously designed for softcore -- the worst I remember is a long one where the camera slowly travels up Pason's body, but when we get to her face as she's giving a blowjob, the camera just happens to drift up so that all we see is the top half of her face. Come on. Take the time to shoot the hard and the soft. On the plus side, if you like redheads, Pason and Audrey Hollander look great and give good performances. I like Julia Ann quite a bit, but I would put this in the lower half of her titles. [Link] |
| ObiBong Senior Member 1162 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 3:05AM The movie opens with the premise that Pason is some kind of genetically engineered, submissive robot -- the perfect fantasy housewife (though we know the real fantasy housewife would be a living, breathing Devinn Lane ). So let's say you're Randy Spears and you ordered yourself a sexy new Pason unit. How are you going to test out just how obedient and nasty she is? Hmmm. Well, in this movie, the first thing you do is have her suck ... your friend's dick. Come on, that's idiotic. The second scene is Randy fucking her himself. How difficult would it be to reverse the scenes so it's a little less stupid? I understand the point of view that worrying about the writing in porn is a waste of time, but this is the kind of thing that drives me crazy. [Link] |
| Kperv The Cuddler *struck (She slipped) 1818 Posts 1/04 | Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 3:19AM [Link] |
| Ben Member 7 Posts 11/04 | Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 11:25AM With that review, I think I'll save my money and look for something better. Ben [Link] |
| ObiBong Senior Member 1162 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Nov 21 2004 : 1:51PM Here's another view. It's not too much different from mine, though I might have liked Audrey's scene a little more. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |