Reviewers Recommend
Hookup Hotshot: Episode 464: Iris LeonHookup Hotshot: Episode 464: Iris Leon - review by Captain Jack
Starring: Iris Leon, Jase Leon. Read review
All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 54 > How much bandwidth does this site eat up?
AuthorPost
nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Sep 23 2004 : 2:01PM
I'm curious about this. How many gigabytes a month does it take to keep all the perverts on this board happy?
Em
Member

198 Posts
4/04
Posted - Sep 23 2004 : 2:18PM
Somewhat more than it might have :]
FallofBecause
Member

Do you have a masturbation escape plan?
251 Posts
10/03
Posted - Sep 23 2004 : 3:02PM
perverts are never satisfied so the bandwidth usage must be astonomical
Drew Black
broken crankshaft

8009 Posts
9/99
Posted - Sep 23 2004 : 6:25PM
about 5.5 - 6.5 Gigabytes per day.
ShiWarrior
Senior Member

1170 Posts
8/01
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 4:47AM
thats a lot!

and whats the bandwidth capable of ? (its maximum is?)

and i thought my home ADSL was fast...

Regards & Thanks, ShiWarrior - - BIG Breast Fan - -

 
morbidthoughts All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Big cats scare me but...
3627 Posts
1/03
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 8:12AM
I remember reading how ESPN.com saved terrabytes per day by tweaking their style sheets to do their table based layout.

I've been tinkering with the CSS file from my work's page to teach myself how to layout with layers rather than tables.

Kperv
The Cuddler

*struck
(She slipped)

1818 Posts
1/04
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 11:08AM
Perhaps frames might help.
The list of links to the left is a lot of overhead on a page like this.
It probably wouldn't look as good as it does right now though.
Frigo
Senior Member

1290 Posts
7/02
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 11:33AM
sounds like my daily trafic statistic at home
nietzsche
Deactivated User

5470 Posts
8/03
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 2:47PM
Holy shit.
Drew Black
broken crankshaft

8009 Posts
9/99
Posted - Sep 24 2004 : 5:01PM
I too have spent some time working on CSS and XHTML in order to reduce the bandwidth consumption. Unfortunately this stuff has had to take a backseat to some other projects but I hope to get back on it soon. Initial indications are that we can save 25% - 40% of our bandwith by making the switch.

At one point in time the menu was a separate file that was cached locally on a user's computer so they didn't have to fetch it with each page. That worked well for about 95% of the users. We eventually switched away from doing it that way for various reasons and never really considered doing it differently.


I'm not sure what out theorethical max bandwidth per day could be. I supposed I could figure it out but I'm lazy. We do hit the max from time to time for an hour or two per day. If you're ever curious you can always look at our bandwidth monitor. The numbers reported on the monitor are for the entire circuit, not just ADT, so they are higher.

Em
Member

198 Posts
4/04
Posted - Sep 25 2004 : 4:31AM
That's the best news I could hear :]
This is even better news. Yay!
I'd venture to say that even more could be saved. I'll follow up in an email.

Em

Em
Member

198 Posts
4/04
Posted - Sep 25 2004 : 4:34AM
They didn't go the whole hog, though, and they also heavily rely on Flash, which is never a good idea. They might have saved more if they went for minimalistic design. Too late...

Em




Jump To: