The only things I would NOT allow would be : children and animals, everything else would be fair game, so long as it is all consensual.
[Link]
Angel Anthology: Angela White, The - review by bono-one| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Curious Man Member US 12 Posts 10/01 |  Posted - Oct 18 2001 : 7:13PMIf you could make the rules about what is allowed and not allowed in adult movies what would you make legal and would you make anything illegal. It seems to me that at least in some ways are freedom has taken a step back. In the 1970's there were scenes with s/m and penetration, fisting, and etc. Europe seems to be a lot more liberal in what is allowed. [Link] |
| BIGmike B-I-G-m-i-k-e 2335 Posts 3/01 | Posted - Oct 18 2001 : 9:03PM The only things I would NOT allow would be : children and animals, everything else would be fair game, so long as it is all consensual. [Link] |
| dexplorer Member 442 Posts 8/01 | Posted - Oct 18 2001 : 9:06PM However, the views expressed on that thread were of the more permissive end of the spectrum around here. When a thread discussed the topic of Rough Sex 1 & 2 having been pulled from distrubtor shelves after release, in an atmosphere of industry and especially distributor and retail concern that it was going too far given the legal climate, voices more in accord with the current limits were heard. See also this thread about a Golden Era classic that underwent some significant censorship cuts in the recent DVD re-issue. And how incongruous I found that in light of some of the new production stuff that's again starting to be released today. Then come back and argue with me. <gg> BTW, BigMike neatly summed up my position as well. The first link above explains just what the current legal situation actually IS pretty well.
[Link] |
| BIGmike B-I-G-m-i-k-e 2335 Posts 3/01 | Posted - Oct 18 2001 : 9:29PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |