shelby69
Member
36 Posts
4/04
|  Posted - Apr 12 2004 : 1:32PMCall it intact, uncut, uncircumcised, whichever you prefer, but it sure would be nice to see this included in the info on male stars. Whether you are a woman like myself who prefers intact penises, or a woman who prefers a circumcised man, this is very pertinent info when gauging the appeal of male stars and their works. I am quite certain that I am not the only person who would appreciate having this info when choosing entertainment. (:I)  [Link] |
DenverDon
Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
| Posted - Apr 12 2004 : 5:38PM
shelby, Welcome to the forum. I understand your interest in this, but I doubt that it will happen, at least as far as most reviews and especially box covers. However, browse the forum because there have been many threads discussing porn stars (including male) and the topic of intact or not comes up quite often in the discussions. Since there are not nearly as many male performers as female it should be relatively easy to identify which ones are intact and which ones are not. Hopefully that should help you. DenverDon Edited by - DenverDon on 4/12/2004 5:38:01 PM  [Link] |
licker
Senior Member
Heretic, Iconoclast, Skeptic
1141 Posts
8/03
| Posted - Apr 12 2004 : 9:28PM
For a reviewer who is just watching a movie, this may be impossible to tell in many cases. The foreskin can retract during the erection process, and the movies very rarely show the guys in the flaccid state.For guys who do "automatically retract" in this way, it happens every time, and the erect penis will look no different from a circumcised one. [Link] |
shelby69
Member
36 Posts
4/04
| Posted - Apr 12 2004 : 10:31PM
Thank you for the run down on the operation of the foreskin, licker. However, I do enjoy the sight of the foreskin doing what it does best......providing excellent sliding, during actual intercourse, hand jobs and oral sex, or any combination thereof. I sure I am not the first to think of the possibilities of the foreskin and the tongue together either.......BTW, this place is fun, educational, and very time consuming!!! Thanks for the welcome.[Link] |
davecummings
Member
368 Posts
12/02
| Posted - Apr 14 2004 : 2:58AM
I am grateful that I was not circumsized (possibly, it was because that I had minimal foreskin)--the foreskin sliding up and down over the bottom of the back side of my itty-bitty pee pee feels fantastic:-)Dave
www.davecummings.com [Link] |
| |
|
licker
Senior Member
Heretic, Iconoclast, Skeptic
1141 Posts
8/03
| Posted - Apr 14 2004 : 6:23AM
I had to get done at age 38, so now I have tried both ways. There's no question about it, the intact guys have got the best deal.[Link] |
Ellis
Member
43 Posts
3/04
| Posted - Apr 14 2004 : 12:03PM
.....I am also an intact male, and I would not trade that for anything, it works very well, and any women that I have been with seem to really enjoy and appreciate the fact that nothing is missing. I can understand having it removed if it is causing a medical condition, but that would be the only reason.......E[Link] |
Hal
Member
8 Posts
4/04
| Posted - Apr 14 2004 : 8:03PM
I'm also uncut.I actually find that I'm so sensitive after cumming I can also cum more than once at a time.I've experienced two or sometimes even three orgasms as a time.I wouldn't trade my foreskin for the world.[Link] |
