If a director chooses to take your approach and conduct such an interview it would likely mean the viewer would hit the fast-forward button and consider it a waste of their time.
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 |  Posted - Jul 30 2012 : 10:17AMA lot of porn films nowadays show interviews of the ladies before their fuck. But I have yet to see an interview of a porn stud who chooses a lady to fuck and explains his reasons why he chooses this lady or that. I think it makes a lot of sense to interview a porn stud, who gets to choose a woman to fuck, because it's the ultimate fantasy of many a man to meet several available women and get to choose among them which one to fuck. For many a man, choosing the pretty lady to fuck from a group of several women is just as much fun as is banging the lady whom he finally chooses. Because in making such a choice, the guy gets to look at the sexiness of each woman and comment about her nice tits, pretty face, good figure etc. Many male viewers would nod in agreement and approve, when they hear the stud talk about the ladies' pretty faces, nice tits, good-looking pussies, hour-glass figures, sexy legs, and gorgeous asses. Because these features of women's bodies have universal appeal for guys. Every guy likes to look at them and think about them. And of course the ultimate enjoyment of such an interview for the viewer would be when the stud finally says which lady he chooses to fuck and why. Because then the interviewer can ask him questions about his plans for blow-job sex, pussy sex, and anal sex with the lady he chose. I think most guys have at least a half-formed plan for how they are going to fuck the pretty lady, when they are about to go at it with her. And it would nice for porn viewers to hear the stud's plan for his lady, before he goes ahead and bangs her. Because knowing what the fucking guy wants to do allows the viewer to sympathize with the fucking guy and be a part of his fantasy. When a guy gets to choose the lady he likes from a group of several women, then his sexual passion for her in the scene is bound to be more genuine and hot. Because when a guy gets to be with the lady he likes the most, then his performance with her is bound to be above average. He is definitely going to put some extra umph behind his hips, when he rides the lady between her sexy ass-cheeks. I think such an interview would work best, if the camera focuses on the ladies about whom the guy is talking, and you only hear the guy's voice. Because then the guy's voice becomes your voice. He is saying things about the ladies that you want to say. And the camera shows you the ladies the way this guy would look at them, even as he talks about them. The stud's point of view, who talks in the film, becomes the viewer's point of view. And of course, you don't look at yourself, when you are talking. You are looking at the ladies who interest you. Edited by - Dan on Jul 30 2012 [Link] |
| Peoples Temple Member People tell lies my friend. Some people like publicity. I don't like publicity. 674 Posts 5/11 | Posted - Jul 30 2012 : 9:59PM If a director chooses to take your approach and conduct such an interview it would likely mean the viewer would hit the fast-forward button and consider it a waste of their time. [Link] |
| T0MBOne Senior Member 1200 Posts 5/08 | Posted - Jul 30 2012 : 11:10PM Edited by - T0MBOne on 7/30/2012 11:11:53 PM [Link] |
| whatsatelephonebill Senior Member 2935 Posts 10/11 | Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 12:25AM In addition, one of these two things which is unlikely to happen would have to: 1.) A girl goes to set, gets dolled up and whatnot, and wastes a couple hours of their day for the chance to get paid to shoot a scene. 2.) A company pays multiple girls some money just to show up and prep for a scene, but only pays 1 girl the money to actually shoot one. [Link] |
| Kezza Member Female porn lover 334 Posts 6/12 | Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 2:39AM The thing that annoys me about most guys and girls in porn is they are like robots or just follow the pack so to speak. I know its a business and they do it for the money and the more extreme and rough the more they get etc and probably don't really enjoy the acts they do all the time but do it because it is business to them. Personally I don't like the rough and extreme stuff but I know its a two way street as I've seen guys tied up, roughed up and humiliated by the girls, and the girls have had to same thing done to them by the guys or other girls. Does not do it for me but if they are going to do it then the best ones are the ones who can handle it, the trouble is you get those who can't and the guy just continues on without regard to his co-star and that is not on in my book. [Link] |
| Kezza Member Female porn lover 334 Posts 6/12 | Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 4:52AM Some of the best porn for me is when the guy and girl show personality and even get on and i am not talking about the sex. [Link] |
| bellend Deactivated User 570 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 5:15AM [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Jul 31 2012 : 9:46AM The only difference would be that the porn stud would choose his woman and not the film director. Which is the way it should be in most porn films anyway. It doesn't make any sense to have an arranged encounter, where the fucking guy has no choice in the woman he fucks. Because it's the guy who does most of the fucking, and he needs to have some chemistry going for the lady in order to have an outstanding performance with her. Why do something that is almost sure to lead to acting rather than real sex? When the guy does most of the performing, then he is the one who should choose, so that he will perform genuinely and not just act it out. This is just common sense. And this common sense is evident in films where the film director also performs in the film. Such films are popular nowadays because in these films the fucking guy gets to choose the women, which makes him perform better with them. I agree that the camera should focus on the women during the guy's interview and not on the guy. But showing the guy choose a woman to fuck from a group of several women immediately persuades the viewer that the guy really wants the woman and isn't just doing it because its his job or because the film director told him to do it. If you want to persuade the viewer that the sex is real and not just acting, then you need to show something that makes it real. And letting the fucking guy choose a woman to fuck from a group of several attractive women makes it as real as real can be. Because virtually any fucking guy would have genuine hots for the woman he gets to choose like that, no matter what the situation is. But the same can't be said about an arranged date, where someone chooses your date for you. This is just common sense, and every guy knows this. Getting to choose a woman to fuck from a group of several attractive women is a lot more hot for any guy, than is going on an arranged fuck-date, where someone else chooses the woman for you. And yet porn films routinely show the less hot version of it, as if porn makers don't care about making their films as hot as they can make. Edited by - Dan on 7/31/2012 9:54:30 AM [Link] |
| Katvena Member Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN 402 Posts 8/12 | Posted - Oct 13 2012 : 11:15PM [Link] |
| Kezza Member Female porn lover 334 Posts 6/12 | Posted - Oct 14 2012 : 12:35AM [Link] |
| Katvena Member Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN 402 Posts 8/12 | Posted - Oct 14 2012 : 1:59AM You got get the right porn stars for it. A Max Hardcore scene and a woman only there for the money, it like watching a fucking train wreak. Nacho Vidal & Tory Lane are great together because they both are loving it they are not doing it for the money. [Link] |
| slyloki Member I don't exist when you don't see me.. 22 Posts 8/12 | Posted - Oct 14 2012 : 8:11AM I know she chooses, whom she wants to perform with, I'll never get the chance to chose from my top 5 female performers, yet the cosmic rays that be, might have her choose me one day.. :S I don't care if he chooses a chick coz she has big tits, no tit's or takes it up the patoui.. I watch porn for what I like.. And girl's if you want to know what makes a guy tick, just bloody ask them, it's that simple!! And aside from anything, it's just another thing antiporn crusaders would cling onto saying it's degrading the women not chosen.. Also, seeing the 'studs' these days seem to fall in a niche, "i like big tits", "i like hairy pussies", "I like big butts", the interviews would get stale very quick.. Stick to fucking, I already ff through the fake interviews with the chicks.. [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Oct 14 2012 : 9:22AM I agree with you that focusing the camera on the guy rather than on the sexy lady will probably ruin the scene for most viewers. But there is no good reason to focus the camera on the guy during the interview. Because the guy would be talking about the ladies and their sexy bodies. The camera would naturally focus on the ladies and not on the guy. And the main thing for the viewer in such a scene is to hear the guy's plan for banging the lady he chooses. Knowing what he is going to do allows you to anticipate the sex action and get you in the mood for it, before it happens. [Link] |
| mharris127 Senior Member 1844 Posts 8/09 | Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 2:57AM If a director could do three scenes using the man's choice format in one day the expense would increase by $2500 (one woman, one man, two extra make-up sessions) Using the standard format the cost would increase by the same amount as above if doing three scenes per day. Same for four scenes. Here are some off the cuff numbers for this scenario. Cost per scene in parentheses for both formats: Choice scene, two in a day with two different men assuming a choice of four women $1000 X 2 men: $2000 $1000 X 5 women: $5000 (two would perform) $250 X 7 Makeup/Airfare: $1750 Total Talent Expense: $8750 ($4375) Three scene expense: $11250 ($3750) Four scene expense: $13750 ($3438) Standard Scene, two scenes, man and woman paired by casting or director $1000 X 2 men: $2000 $1000 x 2 women: $2000 $250 X 4 Makeup/Airfare: $1000 Total Talent Expense: $5000 ($2500) Three scene expense: $7500 ($2500) Four scene expense: $10000 ($2500) If it is possible to do four scenes per day, the expense of the man's choice format isn't all that much in the swing of things. An extra $938 per scene is not much at all for one of the larger producers. Porno Dan might be receptive to something like this, he still hires multiple fluffers per scene paying at least $800 per fluffer for crying out loud! He could do a man's choice scene easily with his per-production budget. [Link] |
| slyloki Member I don't exist when you don't see me.. 22 Posts 8/12 | Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 4:53AM Porn is porn for a reason, just like a good action movie is for action, I don't want to see sly stalone wanking on about how he's going to kill people in rambo 13, I just want to see him do it! [Link] |
| The Ghost of Cal Jammer Senior Member 2207 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 8:09PM [Link] |
| whatsatelephonebill Senior Member 2935 Posts 10/11 | Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 10:50PM As for the money, I don't think you'd have to pay a full scene fee just to get the girl to show up. You'd have to pay her some money, but probably just a few hundred dollars to be a glorified extra (and/or because of any prep that she might have done besides makeup to get ready for a scene). Of course, there's also another question of how many girls would show up for the day for the chance to shoot a scene when they might have been able to book themselves for a guaranteed scene otherwise, which paying each girl her full rate would get rid of. [Link] |
| mharris127 Senior Member 1844 Posts 8/09 | Posted - Oct 15 2012 : 11:00PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |