One or too or a few are fine. My wife has tattoos. A real turn off when they are everywhere and they belong in a freakshow not a porno. There is nothing finer than a natural womans body. imho
I don't like tattoos at all either, but it seems everyone is getting them these days, I don't find them attractive at all though, and avoid porn where the women, or men for that matter have tattoos. That's why I mainly end up watching older movies, back before everyone was covered in tattoos and had 10 piercings. I mean that's fine for those that like it, but I just don't, maybe I am more conservative in what I like women to look like, nothing wrong with that, if that's what you prefer guys. Everyone likes something different, if you like women to be totally covered in tattoos and be pierced everywhere that's fine too, just not for me, or lots of other guys out there, but it is for some guys.
Bella Bellz will never be a favorite of mine because she is part of this new trend of girls who get butt implants and then use tattoos to cover the surgery scars. Whenever I see girls with tattoos on their butt/hips and studs or their lower back or ribs then that screams automatic red flag. Some guys like fake butts but I'm not one, I cant get attracted to penetrating two big bags of gel.
I may be the oddball here, but I don't like watching pornography if a girl DOES NOT have at least one tattoo. Girls with no tats just seem to wholesome for pornography to me. I admit it's weird, and I can't explain it to well, but chicks with tats just fit porn better.
^ I'm attracted to girls with tats even outside of porn. I've always thought that girls with an alt look are very sexy. "Normal" is boring. "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and gentle...Big Time Sensuality!"
Is anyone else turned off by tattoos? - yep, me But, perhaps I'm just getting too old. Though i can abide (and even like) a strategically placed tattoo on occassion, such as the "heartbreaker" tattoo on Jenna Jameson's ass, or the tattoo above August Ames' pussy. I just don't like it when they are slathered with them - when there are sleeves, etc. Too each their own, I just hope that it doesn't become some extreme minority to find porn with women who don't have billboards on their asses. Once upon a time, one had to buy an Easy Rider magazine to see this level of coverage, now it has become much more mainstream. Viva European (untouched) porn women I guess.
*Curious* ... is the way some people feel about tattoos analogous to how people reacted when bush shifted to shaved in the 80s??? It would be interesting to note the ages of people who have a stronger aversion to tattoos =-/ WE age, porn stars dont ;) ...(I mean overall, the actors/actresses are turned over, newer "models", yadda yadda... well, except for Ron Jeremy =p )
Im a little slow on the "uptake"...sort of a dumb-blonde when it comes to humour... A google search produced Matthew McConaughey--I assume its a Dazed & Confused reference but only seen the movie once =-/ I guess I will add to my weekend's to-do list. (A slight break from porn would be healthy--the amputee-porn will just have to wait).
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06
Posted - Jul 19 2015 : 4:38AM
^ That is indeed the Wooderson I was referencing. "That's what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older... They stay the same age," would be the particular quote. While you weren't referencing high school girls I think the gist was the same. (and no offense intended of course)
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Jul 19 2015 : 4:55AM
Lately what's been turning me off is the new cameras being used, Mark Wood bragged about those on twitter, these cameras made his dick look bigger. Well if that's a reason he better take a day off work or go grab some german sausages. The dicks just look thin and starved and dying at the end of the day. It's not very uplifting at all to sit and fuckin' watch. It's more like witnessing the death of the dicksupply. And what's even worse and a lot scarier, is the very fact that a spinner like Ariana Marie looked twohundred and fifty feet tall on Young & Glamorous # 7 With legs stretching all the way to Kansas. It did not help the situation at all that her pretty ass all of a sudden looked like it belonged to a ninety year old, even if that's nothing I been seeing, it looked that way, long and slack and hanging out of shape. So please throw those cameras the hell away before I kill myself in deep end frustration. I wil not buy another DVD if these sucking cameras are being used. I don't care much about long thin dicks at all. Because I don't have a fetish for german sausages. I don't even like overflowin' tatoos, man. I find it poisoning on a human level. Toxic waste do not belong to fresh skin.
See - from what I can see, tattoos are very much "normal" nowadays though. It's a hugely popular trend, especially in the US. everybody seems to be getting them. You can't walk through a mall or public place without seeing tons of people with ridiculous looking full sleeves and neck tattoos. as for the "Normal" is boring comment - I'd disagree. There's nothing hotter than seeing a pretty, clean looking, tat-free "girl next door" type completely surprising you by getting down and dirty by doing anal, DP and swallowing. Girls with lots of really conspicuous tattoos - nothing about the scene is going to surprise me. "This girl with the prison tats is probably going to put three baseball bats in her anus. If she was brave enough to get a giant swallow/sparrow tattooed on her neck, I'm assuming she's not a cum dodger.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jul 20 2015 : 1:07PM
^Full sleeves and neck tattoos are not "normal nowadays."
[Link]
Foobachi Deactivated User
251 Posts 4/13
Posted - Jul 20 2015 : 1:16PM
maybe not "normal" but they are becoming very, very common. go to any large urban shopping area when it's busy and count the number of people wearing tank tops showing of full sleeves. You'll run out of fingers to count them on it less than an hour. Neck tats are a bit less common, but I see at least 2 or 3 per day on my way to and from work. 20-30 years ago, you might see one person like this a year, and only if you were in prison, or were at a hardcore punk show, or a biker convention.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jul 20 2015 : 2:16PM
^Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that tattoos in general are becoming more normal and are even now socially acceptable to some degree, but full sleeves and neck tattoos are not "normal" even here in San Francisco, where tattoos are not at all uncommon.
And then: Wow you just did a complete 180 degree turn around. When I say that I am attracted to girls with an alternative look it doesn't mean that they must cover their entire body with ink. I do however think that women with some ink, some piercings, perhaps some odd colored nails or a unique hairstyle are very sexy. I'm not going to berate you for disliking tattoos on a female however I do find it fascinating how you associate "tat-free" with "pretty" and "clean looking"?There's no need for you to resort to extreme generalizations. Let's keep it real: I think that you're making some questionable assumptions regarding women both with and without tattoos that may not reflect reality. Look at my top 10 girls posted here on ADT and you'll see that none of them have their neck or arms covered in tats. I think that they are beautiful. In my opinion my top 5: Veronica, Roxy, Ashley, Alysa and Proxy fit the description of "getting down and dirty" very well. So where are their prison tats? "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and gentle...Big Time Sensuality!" Edited by - Love on 7/20/2015 4:20:31 PM
+1 to all of this Makes me think in the next generation, just like "Alex P Keaton" on family ties was a Republican mainly to (at least subconciously) tweak his hippie parents noses, if everybody is tatted & pierced, their kids would have to be "natural" to stick out or stick it to the new "man"
I really don't care how many tattoos a performer has. The substance of her scenes are what is going to get me going. Bella Bellz for example. Never really care about how many tattoos she has. I love to see that ass jiggle like jello when a guy goes all in it.
I completely agree. It's much hotter when an innocent-looking girl turns out to be a dirty whore in bed.
[Link]
Foobachi Deactivated User
251 Posts 4/13
Posted - Jul 24 2015 : 4:22PM
I'm not making any assumptions about women's personalities, or beliefs, or their "person". Porn is a visual medium. We watch it to be turned on. It's already assumed going in that sex is going to be performed in porn. If something in a given scene is a distraction to the point of turning you off, then you won't buy scenes/movies from that performer or company. When the trend of this kind of distraction becomes popular or commonplace, people are entitled to voice their opinions, and vote with their wallets.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jul 24 2015 : 4:43PM
I'm really beginning to wonder what city or town you people are living in where you see "tons of people with ridiculous looking full sleeves and neck tattoos." Such tattoos are not normal.
[Link]
Foobachi Deactivated User
251 Posts 4/13
Posted - Jul 24 2015 : 5:08PM
I live near and work in one of the major cities on the east coast. I commute here every day with millions of other people on various public transit systems. Today I decided, just for shits and giggles, to count the number of people I saw on my 1 hour commute who have full sleeve or neck tattoos. Not including bike messengers, I counted 4 neck tattoos, and 17 full or at least 3/4 sleeve tattoos. and it's a Friday in the summer when probably half the people aren't even in the city working because they are off on vacation. It's very common. I would imagine it's less common in more conservative areas of the country, like the south or the bible belt. but in major coastal metro areas like New York, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Miami, Boston, Seattle - it's everywhere.
At the end of the day, it is what it is. 629 Posts 12/09
Posted - Jul 25 2015 : 11:19AM
In theory, as more and more girls get tats, a new niche is created of girls who have no tats. Possibly more career opportunities in the 'no-tat' niche.
An image burning in her mind and between her thighs. 137 Posts 1/12
Posted - Jul 25 2015 : 11:29AM
I love natural girls and tatted up girls. Bonnie Rotten, Christy Mack, and Joanna Angel are among my all time faves. So I love the alternative look but can get into a gnd just as well.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Jul 25 2015 : 11:53AM
I think that you and I are defining "a ton" differently. You're talking about a mere 21 people out of all the people you saw during a 1 hour commute. I agree that tattoos in general have become more socially acceptable and "normal." There's no shortage of tattoos where I live and I have some myself, but it seems to me that you are exaggerating the alleged normalcy of full sleeves and neck tattoos in particular to make a point. Edited by - misspornUSA on 7/25/2015 11:54:23 AM
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06
Posted - Jul 25 2015 : 4:12PM
^ She's 61, not 70. Don't get me wrong, she looks amazing at 61, but things can start dropping off fast. If you want to throw out a better example of a still attractive septuagenarian than Helen Mirren (who is technically 69 for another few hours) I'd love to see it, but despite still looking good her skin is still not what I'd consider A+. That said, you're missing the point. Even if Christie Brinkley looks just as amazing a 70, people that don't like tattoos will think she looks good without them and people that like tattoo's will think that she'd look good with them. The whole "what will her skin look like at 70" is a completely pointless argument. The whole reason most people's tattoos look like crap when they're 70 is because people generally look like crap when they're 70. The tattoos have nothing to do with it.
When it comes to tats, with me, its very simple--when the tattoo, not the woman's body, becomes the center of attention, its too much. A tattoo then, should be located in certain parts of the body, and not others, to be "really" appealing, and if I could pick one example of how unbelievably sexy tattoos can be, if properly placed, I would only point to the "timeless" beauty of Julia Ann, a woman, all cameras "adore" and calendars ignore.
Obviously all of these answers are going to be based largely on personal preference, so here is mine. No, I am not a fan of tattoos on women, especially the large ones and head - to - toe coverings. I do however enjoy a couple of the smaller ones that really identify with the actress whether it be personal or funny. Three examples of tattoos I don't mind are Envy's cartoon devil with pitchfork, Friday's "F", and of course Jenna Jameson's heartbreaker tat.
As long it's not on the chest, tits or stomach I'm fine with it, as long as they aren't distracting. And If a porn girl who didn't have tats before suddenly has a lot of them, that requires getting used to which isn't always possible for me. Like with Natalie Heart! (No, just no) Btw, Bella Bellz is fucking amazing!!! Edited by - UNRELIABLE NARRATOR on 8/1/2015 10:00:31 AM
I have an assosiate around, a fellow I grew up with, a half some crazy bastard, he once told me had got a tat on his dick. It came as no chock though I did not beg for a proof. That was back in the 90s before tattoes where poppin' out. What kinda surprises me is the fact that I have yet to see a tattooed dick showing up from out my closet or some shoebox of mine. I'm sure the net can provide further details but I won't give a fuck if not ballsacks are the premise.
I see women with tattoos every day in real life, so that sort of thing's normal to me. I have no understanding of the actual desire to get tattoos, but the look's not a turnoff. As far as women not looking "natural" goes, for me it's the high heels and ridiculous outfits and excessive makeup that tend to be turn-offs. It's the excess of this sort of generic, plastic perfection. For me, a lot of porn performers are right on the edge of Uncanny Valley. Tattoos actually go some way towards preventing generic perfection. I could stand to see some more tattoos on this crop of seemingly identical women pouring out of Eastern Europe, for instance.
I'm not a fan of tats on porn stars but with ink becoming the new normal, I've come to tolerate it in moderation. Romi Rain, Monique Alexander, Capri Cavanni and more recently Marsha May are a few of my favorite inked performers.
Exactly right Axxxl. They have become so prevalent that one sort of has to accept "a few", but some girls quite frankly ruin themselves. I'd love for someone to borrow Doc Brown's de Lorean and prevent some well known stars from getting quite so many. Edited by - Molsoncp on 8/30/2015 1:51:49 AM
I'll admit, I was completely turned off when I first started seeing tattoos on women in porn. I can still remember the first, I don't remember her name but she had a MASSIVE rose in between her breasts. It just RUINED the feminine charm she could have had. But since then, I think it's the same as guys. Some look ridiculous, some are great BEAUTIFUL pieces of art that only add to the mystique and sensuality of the actress. I can't STAND it when I have to spend HOURS photoshopping out tattoos on models though. Just my 2 cents.
the hornet's nest poker in me wonders aloud if one of the reasons that Playboy stopped doing nudes is that they can't find women anymore that don't have gauges or "God Rides a Yamaha" tattooed on their backs
Posted - Jul 18 2015 : 1:25AM
Wow you just did a complete 180 degree turn around. When I say that I am attracted to girls with an alternative look it doesn't mean that they must cover their entire body with ink. I do however think that women with some ink, some piercings, perhaps some odd colored nails or a unique hairstyle are very sexy.
