I've seen clippets of the sight on the net and its always showing the chicks crying supposedly due to the guys slamming them during anal sex. Is this site legit with that???? Or is it just a big ol fake-o crying??? Cause I'm starting to suspect its fake.
All porn is acting and fantasy but having chatted to one or two of the female participants on Facialabuse it is apparently a rough experience being treated in such a degrading way and they were certain about one thing they were not going back for seconds despite the money being good. Its a pity Duke has been banned he could have told you more colourfully than I his opinion regarding what happens on his site.
Porn stars DO come from the Midwest! 273 Posts 11/07
Posted - Jun 30 2009 : 9:07AM
I discussed this once with Tecey Heart who was on that site a year or two ago and she related that what you saw in her appearance on there was VERY real. Money was very good but she wouldn't do it again.
hey guys, from my experience its "ROLE" i played, i knew what i was getting into, the money was good, but i wouldnt do it again. they have "safe words" in case you either A: are in serious pain, torn, hurt, etc or B: decided you mentally cant get through it... they do try and talk you in to finishing the scene. I used the safe word because i cant stand puke(which the face f*ck you till you gag) they offered to just be done with the throat gagging and i was fine... i knew it was just another role i was playing, so i tuned out the spitting and name calling... "im the girl your mother warned you about"
@ lilmissmackenzeepierce - Let me just say that although sometimes (Ok, often) I find your posts a little angry, I (for one) do appreciate your candor.
well i could see that, im just very very literal and very abrasive but deep down... no not even deep down, in general i am a sweet fun loving goofy girl "im the girl your mother warned you about"
@ RandomPrecision & lilmissmackenzeepierce: The more truth (& less marketing) we can get in these forums the better. While I'm always looking for genuine "damn I've never seen that on camera before" moments... seeing girls crying is never arousing.
I would really enjoy watching that actually. Far as I'm concerned, real or not, these guys make porn for men who hate women. You can argue that folks like this are a niche market that deserve their brand of porn too, but isn't it ultimately bad for the industry as a whole? If there are seasoned pros who say they wouldn't do it again, what does that tell you about the not so experienced girls they feature? You gotta wonder how many potentially brilliant porn careers have been nipped in the bud by stuff like this.
^^ Why not? It's already been stated here that it is a) good money, b) you can invoke the safe word and end the scene at any time and c) some performers actually like a challenge. Would you deny a performer the right to make money just because it doesn't match with your ideals? Why not just move along and not buy/watch that scene/vid instead?
^ If you seriously think Hannah is likely to take advice from you or I regarding where and for whom she works then you have a highly inflated opinion of what influence you think you exercise on a forum where members only have the right to express their opinions in a polite and civil way. Perhaps you need to chill and accept that not all will necesarily agree with your opinion.
My mistake, I thought he actually enjoyed the crying scene but yes, those guys deserve a beating because I hate the way they try to break down a girl like that!
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jul 6 2009 : 12:22PM
^I'll just repeat back to you the same thing you said to me when I complained that I don't like foot fetish movies: Don't watch it.
There's a big difference, in a foot-fetish movie nobody is being abused to a point of being raped. It vexes me that Max Hardcore is in jail while that POS Duke Skywalker is running around free!
Ramsey, I think you need to understand why Max is in prison. I assure you, it has nothing to do with abuse or rape. He is serving his 4 years on a conviction entirely built on obscenity charges. And I'm sure he won't be the last pornographer indicted for such, either. All it takes is one closed mind to a particular fetish to rule it as "obscene" by community standards. Wherever that community happens to be. Edited by - LubenLuv on 7/6/2009 3:14:46 PM
How do you know the girls in foot fetish movies aren't completely repulsed? My sister hates feet and once dumped a guy because he wanted to suck on her toes. She said it was the most disgusting thing she could think of. Edited by - randomprecision on 7/6/2009 11:28:36 PM
I don't watch this kind of stuff, because for every freaky girl who's into very rough and degredation there's probably like 9 who're not. And there's plenty of strong porn out there so what's the need to push it any further, just because it's possible? How all porn is just fantasy is bullshit. Over-cynical or as a way to defend what is basically violent porn.
[Link]
The Juicer Idiot of the Year
17 Posts 7/09
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 2:01AM
I have a real serious problem with the way Facial Abuse has been produced in the last few years , it hasnt changed much from the standard straight sex scenes involving a lot of hardcore guy-girl abuse. While I think that totally degrading sexy slutty pornstars and amateur girls with a lot of heavy face spitting, slapping, thunder throatfucking and anal/pussy raping is a real erotic turn-on...its also gotten really really boring and predictable right people?? I really wish that Duke Skywalker would consider making a very hot nasty all-girl lesbian version of Facial Abuse, the new name should be called "DYKE ABUSE". On DYKE ABUSE, there would be some sexy pornstar bitch who would play the new role of "Duke". She would control the action behind the camera, ordering her 4-6 sexy slutty lesbo teammates to basically, slap & spit on a hot sexy "whore", while degrading her. Then lots of wet pussy/asshole fisting, licking, sucking and even deep pussy eating. After all that wild lesbo action is done, add some serious oiled-up strap-on fucking into the whore's pussy and asshole really good and hard. So good, it makes the whore squirt her pussy juice, all over the faces and mouths of the pussy hungry teammates just wanting to drink all that wet pink juice. After half an hour of relentless lesbian girl on girl abuse action , all done in a very calm casual relaxing way inside some cheap studio....the DYKE and her TEAMMATES would all piss ( yes I said urinate ) into a giant plastic clear funnel and the sexy nasty WHORE would basically drink all that female piss and swallow it down. Then followed by 20 additional women walking into the room and 5 groups of 4 sluts all gather around in a half circle and basically piss all over the WHORE again, until all 20 have done their dirty wet lesbian pissing deeds all over the WHORE'S face, eyes , mouth, hair, tits and shes just completely soaked in wet girly piss piss piss piss piss and more piss...then if all that wasnt enough for you to handle.. The same 20 EXTRAS plus the 4-6 TEAMMATES all stand in line and SPIT on the whore while calling her very nasty things like the common: bitch, slut, whore, cunt, rape victim , lesbo.....having no sympathy for the dumb whore who wanted to participate in DYKE ABUSE. After its all done The original DYKE would calmly interview the WHORE , if she really liked her experience , why she did it ....and if she wanted to come back Heres the catch... While shes getting interviewed by the DYKE , the 4-6 lesbo TEAMMATES would all walk up to her, piss on her fucking nasty face , while shes trying hard to answer the DYKE'S questions. NO MEN, NO MUSIC, NO FAKE LESBIAN SEX , NOTHING BUT JUST PURE ALL-GIRL NASTY ABUSE ACTION. Now thats what Duke Skywalker or someother female porn fetish director needs to start doing . Facial Abuse, as well as Latina Abuse and Ghetto Gaggers will always be an original, but its time to step outside of the male-female fetish and start focusing equally on hot lesbian girl-girl action. Think of it as Duke Skywalker's Facial Abuse + Kink.com's WhippedAss = DYKE ABUSE
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 3:48AM
BTW the 'Juicer' is really Mr. Squirt, but he's trying to sound a little more reasonable this time.
[Link]
The Juicer Idiot of the Year
17 Posts 7/09
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 3:59AM
thank you =) I am reasonable im not complaining about no one on the adult industry. I just want my fantasy to come true Dyke Abuse all-girl hot lesbo sex
I've probably never even actually seen "real" lesbian sex, but I'm pretty sure it's nothing like what you described in the rest of your post.
[Link]
StillHope Deactivated User
"You didn't say Car Ram Rod" 149 Posts 2/06
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 12:51PM
While I agree that for some girls it is a role, for most it is a paycheck. Now, I understand they sign a waiver, they are told exactly what is going to happen to them (well, somewhat), but I still think Duke pushes the envelope, especially for the newbies. I am sorry, but I think a genuine "Ouch, Ow, that hurts" should stop any scene, along with genuine crying. Also, the reason I don't think the girls are told everything is because in Hannah's scene, Duke directs Big Red to turn around and shove his ass in her face. He tells her to eat it and she looks at him and says out loud "Are you serious?" No way she was told ass eating was part of the scene. Also, he commands her to bark like a dog, which she refuses, he literally grabs her head, grits his teeth and says "Fuckin do it, I am not playin around here" Now, I know rough sex fans will cry "She could have stopped the scene if she wanted to", and again you are right, she could have. But for two seconds realize you are dealing with girls who for the most part have never done a porn before and they really need the money. They think if they refuse to do something that they won't get paid. Think about it, you get throat pumped to the point of puking for 10-15 minutes, then you refuse to eat the guy's ass, and are sent home with no paycheck. If that is what you think will happen, then most likely you are gonna eat the guy's ass even if you don't want to. If the subject had been broached before the scene, none of that would happen. Finally, the closing interview. I am sorry, I have seen a lot of porn and you can say what you want, Duke is asking those questions to the girl, not the character. "Have you ever felt this degraded in your personal life? Tell us what the most degrading part was. Do you feel like a totally worthless whore now?" All this while 2-4 loads are dripping down her face, and if that weren't enough, they usually add about 4-5 spitwads on there and make her keep the cum on there for way longer than most avg. porn (spare bukkake's). I am not trying to get them banned or anything, and some of their scene's with the pro's are actually quite good. I am simply saying that unlike Mckenzie Pierce , 70% of those girls are not playing a role.
I find it absolutely fascinating that so many porn fans believe that the performers are only in porn because they have no choice, are at the end of their financial rope and are more or less forced into taking these kinds of scenes to survive. Rather than worrying about how many porn performer are being mistreated, I wonder how many porn fans need psychological counseling to deal with their latent guilt for watching porn?
Yeah, and it could also be that a performer, especially a newbie, might not stop the scene because they might be mentally overwhelmed or in shock. When you're already stressed by a situation like that, convulsing from being choked and puking, trying to catch your breath, etc. and you've got two pricks barking orders at you, I don't think you can be expected to make the most rational decisions. How many rape victims don't scream or call out for help even though that's sort of what you'd expect a person to do? Maybe that's a bit of a stretch, but there's a common element there.
I think in the end the point is this: These guys are rough. By anyone's standards, these guys get pretty rough. There may be some people who get rougher, but these guys are definitely up there. They also do things that were not talked about beforehand. But realistically, when you're being insanely rough, a LOT of shit goes on, and it's pretty tough to be able to hash that all out before the scene. "Can I put my hand in exactly this place on your back while referring to you as a dirty cum-sucking whore at exactly this volume and having exactly this amount of spit coming out of my mouth while holding your head exactly this far above the ground?" But are the girls ok with it? Well, sometimes yes, and sometimes no. There are girls who post here on ADT who have done FA.com and said they enjoyed it, even the unexpected parts... and there are girls who post here on ADT who have done FA.com and said they didn't enjoy it, especially because of the unexpected stuff. The guys of FA.com may do something the woman has not consented to beforehand, but she allows to happen once it's going on. But they also might do something the woman has not consented to beforehand, and she does not consent to it during the scene, and so they stop. But by the time the girl can say she doesn't want it to happen, realistically, the only reason she knows she doesn't want it to happen is because they've already done it to her. So she can't say that she doesn't want it to happen; she can only say she doesn't want it to happen again. In that sense, it may be just as incorrect to call it consensual as it is to call it non-consensual. This is something else, perhaps somewhere in between the two.
[Link]
StillHope Deactivated User
"You didn't say Car Ram Rod" 149 Posts 2/06
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 3:54PM
I know I do. Seriously, I am in a bit of a financial pinch, so if you are offering, I will take you up on it. As long as their are no Rorschach Tests. Every time I answer "Brandon Iron's mushroom stamp'n, jaw wirin' good lawd go home and smack you mama Penis", the shrink looks at me puzzled for several moments, then quietly leaves the room. "you know, rest areas are homosexual hangouts...they're the bath houses of the 90's for many many many gay men"
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 4:42PM
It's disgusting... to you. Going back to the foot fetish thing, I complained that I find that disgusting, but you find it to be a turn-on. What's repulsive to one person may be enticing to another. As for blowjobs, believe it or not, I have heard more than a few women say that they are more turned-off by a guy going down on them than they are by going down on a guy. Indeed, there are plenty of women who, if they had to choose, would prefer to give a guy a BJ than have a guy go down on them. And this is just based on what I've heard several women actually say. So what RandomPrecision says does not sound at all unsual to me. Again, just because something is a turn-off for you doesn't mean it's the same for everybody else.If you think that, then you obviously miss the point of why people watch the site. It's called FacialAbuse for a reason.
[Link]
StillHope Deactivated User
"You didn't say Car Ram Rod" 149 Posts 2/06
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 4:47PM
killbillvol69: You make many good points. I don't agree with all of them, but you made them rationally and I thank you for that. I would simply say that when dealing with newbies and putting them in such a rough situation, everything does need to be discussed beforehand. Your example is, by any standard a hyperbole.But whether or not you are going to do oral on a guy's ass is a pretty big deal, not in the same ball park as where you are going to put your hand or how loud you are going to yell. Plus, if they were more aware or respectful of the talent's limits, I just believe they would put out a superior product. But alas, they seem to be doing quite satisfactory in the fiscal area of things. To sum it up, Pushing a girl to her very limit is one thing, pushing her beyond that is simply another". As another poster here said (Mike something I think) "The problem with train wreck porn is in order to keep the fan base, you have to create bigger and bigger train wrecks"...at the expense of the talent.
""The problem with train wreck porn is in order to keep the fan base, you have to create bigger and bigger train wrecks"...at the expense of the talent." And yet anal was a novelty and pretty rare 20 years ago. Today, it's commonplace. Yes, times change. Porn needs to change to keep up with it. Consumers seem to be VERY addicted to "reality" or "extreme" anything these days, mainstream or porn. FacialAbuse, while not my own cup of tea (I do enjoy very rough sex but not as a spectator), obviously hits the "extreme" category pretty well right now and depending on your perspectives perhaps even the "reality" segment as well, particularly if you believe that much of it is non-scripted perversion and debauchery. But not EVERY porn viewer likes change and there are those who like the softer stuff. Vivid built a whole freakin' empire on that, and the gonzo stuff seems to have taken strong hold everywhere else to push garden-variety hardcore. But just as porn changes, so do the performers. As evidenced by at least some performers in this thread, some see extreme porn as a challenge....go the extra mile past the boundaries and get the extra money. How is this any different than signing up as a contestant on Survivor knowing you'll have to be eating bugs to make the final episode? That isn't in the script either.....or is it???
[Link]
StillHope Deactivated User
"You didn't say Car Ram Rod" 149 Posts 2/06
Posted - Jul 7 2009 : 5:25PM
First off... major props for the ..."Or is it". Secondly, your avatar quote about tying up some loose ends, awesomely funny. Thirdly, I think this argument is turning into a Billy Preston song "Will It Go Round in Circles?" I could bring up the tired old hyperbolic "But consumers also have a taste for kiddie porn and snuff" to which you would of course (and correctly) "Don't compare rough sex to snuff or kiddie porn" to which I could reply "It was only a hyperbole to prove a point that we can't always depend on consumer's tastes to be the driving force. Capitalism is great with the proper restrictions (such as the Sherman Anti-Trust) but unbridled capitalism can descend into anarchy" To which you would smartly reply "It amazes me how many of you guys think these girls are forced into doing porn due to economic hardship or tricked into doing a hardcore scene. These girls can stop the scene anytime they want" To which I would reply "Or can they?" And just like this post, the topic would indeed go round in circles. Somebody call Billy Preston. "I bent my wookie"
Fair 'nuff. Or one of us could just say "Nazi" and thereby finish this thread quickly by invoking Godwin's Law. But given the emotions that often are exhibited in these types of threads, I'm sure another one just like it will pop up within a few days. ......race you there?
Hey. I was just pointing out that what's great for one woman might not be so great for another and your condemnation of rough sex is sheer hypocrisy as long as you expect porn chicks to do anything that's off the beaten path. How do you know they wouldn't rather get their ass spanked or their throat fucked than to have their feet played with? You are projecting your thoughts and emotions onto them. You could be right but you could just as easily be wrong. As I have said many times, I have no choice but to assume these girls do a small amount of research if they're not sure about what they're getting into. I have to trust their judgment. I'm a passive viewer. All I can do is count on them to behave like adults. Edited by - randomprecision on 7/7/2009 9:16:51 PM
OK. So where are all the victims? We've heard a few say they didn't have a good time and wouldn't do it again but that doesn't necessarily mean it was nonconsensual. There are girls who do one vanilla porn scene and decide porn isn't for them. Are they all victims too? Believe me. I'm not a fan of this site but as some folks say, it is what it is. They don't hide how unpleasant their shit is. You can see it in any of their previews. Would we even be having this conversation about boxing? Lets say a new boxer gets hit harder than he thought he would or his opponent doesn't stop pummeling him when he's supposed to. That's life as a boxer. You know what you're getting into and if you don't, you learn the hard way. The first time I saw "Facial Abuse" in a Google search, I knew (more or less) exactly what it was. Just the name should be enough to scare women who aren't into that shit. I know plenty of women myself and I don't know many stupid ones. Women know what it's all about when they see "Facial Abuse" on a web page.
You might want to see somebody about that.
[Link]
StillHope Deactivated User
"You didn't say Car Ram Rod" 149 Posts 2/06
Posted - Jul 8 2009 : 2:15AM
Sorry, the "Or Can They" was a direct quote from another post my friend AstroGlide, I mean LubenLuv did on another topic. I seriously should have made that point more clear, I know they can stop the scene. BTW, once again I stared into the eyes of my man Gary B. before reading your post. You win the internet for the most awesome avatar ever. The Bent My Wookie is a Simpsons quote from Ralph Wiggum. As far as the boxer goes, good analogy, but like all of them, slightly flawed. Boxing is boxing. Rough sex scenes can span the spectrum.
I am amazed at how this thread has raised such differing emotions in a number of members posting here. Some have given the topic serious thought and analysis in order to try and put their finger onto why we either accept that the girls knew what they were getting into or the opposing opinion that the rough bullying was excessive and even cruel. My conclusion is that it all depends on who the female talent is. If for example it was Gina or Mackenzee that is fine as they knew exactly what was expected going in and just how far they would allow themselves to be bullied before saying "Hey WTF" - on the other hand the relative new girls dont really know how to handle themselves in these situations so when things start getting excessive that is when the "real" crying and emotional scarring occurs. They are vulnerable because of their inexperience and are therefore easily exploited and persuaded to do things that more experienced stars would never accept. Experienced and strong stars can handle this type of shoot but newbies need to be warned by their agents that this type of shoot may just change their views on what they thought porn was like. The trauma of this type of abuse may just put them off ever doing any further work in the porn industry. Edited by - melt on 7/8/2009 10:32:18 AM
I don't know that they can. I'm just a viewer. I assume that they can. If by some chance they can't, if they're really upset about it, that is something they need to address themselves. I have to assume these people are as mature as their ages would suggest. I have to assume they would try and do something about it if something unexpected happened and they were angry enough about it.
The spectrum of what? It seems like to me that it's a fine analogy. Or would be if there wasn't a double standard between men and women and sex and everything else. If a male boxer gets slugged in a face and knocked unconscious, so what? If a female working for a sex site called "Facial Abuse" didn't know it was going to be rough and probably unpleasant, some folks want to make a federal case out of it. Hell, I'll go as far as to say if there was no sex involved and we were talking about two women kickboxing each other's brains out, nobody would have a single complaint unless it didn't last long enough or they didn't see any blood. Like I said, double standard between sex and everything else. If it was two men, as long as nobody died, who would care?
Gotta side with StillHope here, it's a pretty flawed analogy. Boxing involves punching, right? "Abuse" in boxing involves what, an excess of punching? (Mike Tyson's penchant for ears notwithstanding)... Rough sex "abuse" can involve gagging, inducing vomiting through gagging, smearing said vomit on the performer's face, forcing a dick down the performer's throat, keeping a dick in the performer's mouth and pinching her nostrils cutting off her air supply, upside-down face fucking that can cause phlegm, vomit or semen to fill her nostrils and even cause inhalation of said fluids, pinching, slapping, choking, choking in conjunction with gagging, forcing the performers face into the male talent's filthy ass, and of course any degree of hair pulling necessary to facilitate these things. And this is just oral sex-related abuse. I could probably think of more, but I don't typically watch this kind of porn. You said that you knew exactly what to expect from the name "Facial Abuse" and presume that others would (or should). Well I've been watching porn for just about as long as some of these younger performers have been alive and I honestly did not know what to expect. Maybe I'm just incredibly naive, but I don't think the "what part of 'abuse' didn't you understand" argument is a very valid one.
You don't? Let me put it as simply as I possibly can. Let's say I give you a phone call and ask you if you'd like to come over to my house for some facial abuse. Does that sound like fun to you?