Khan Tusion

I did a lot of scratching around and found out who he REALLY is (hint he has a close relative in national radio syndication)

what he really is, on the other hand is a pathetic piece of human debris.

Yes Im tempted to out his punk ass but not just yet....

[Link]

Edited by - Tinaka on 9/10/2006 6:24:12 PM

[Link]

[invalid URL removed]Khan Tusion

[Link]

wonder how he'd feel when the real world sees him....the handful of people in porn are ho hum about it His brother wouldn't be I'd bet

[Link]

Edited by - Sh0Ck on 9/11/2006 12:24:37 PM

[Link]

This is an entirely different vibe than what Khan sometimes does.
I'm talking about scenes where the girl is authentically turned on by sexual submission and the rough stuff is entirely consensual, in fact, orgasmic, for her.

I gotta check this scene with Cloe out.

[Link]

Than why, after I did link to that IMDB page, was I threatened with banishment and was my topic swiftly removed ?

Edited by - Twiki on 9/11/2006 1:34:31 PM

[Link]

- Mike

[Link]

Well, at least they can't take away [invalid URL removed]our [invalid URL removed]memories.

Edited by - Twiki on 9/11/2006 3:00:16 PM

[Link]

Edited by - skronker on 9/11/2006 4:15:06 PM

[Link]

There are girls such as Taryn Thomas who regretted their scene with him. But Taryn said afterwards that Khan wasn't monster, and instead the problem was that she should never have attempted that kind of scene in the first place (this was Taryn's pre-Shylock days).

And that's part of the problem. He pays very well and unfortunately if you offer that much a lot of the girls have a "Yes!" reflex because of the money. He tries to weed out the girls who really aren't up to it, but sometimes that doesn't work. They talk about what's going to happen in the shoot, they see footage from earlier shoots, yet when asked if they're up to it their brain just short-circuits to Yes! because of the $$$

[Link]

The basic rule I use on another porn site is generally no real names or personally identifiable information, unless the victim outs themselves. Just because you can get that info elsewhere doesn't mean I want it "here" - I don't want to be a stalker magnet.

Jenna Jameson is easy because she puts her real name on her website. Jill Kelly OK because she deliberately chose to be a corporate officer in a publicly-traded company (JKP) which meant she's going to be in a lot of SEC filings. Then there are cases like Hailey Paige whose affidavit against Martin del Toro lists her real name.

And it's not just courtesy: stalkers are a real threat and not just from outside. Remember the Allie Ray threats against Gen Padova? Just reading this thread I see several wannabe stalkers...

(as for Khan not showing his face ... come on, do we really need to see more guy faces in porn? It's about the girls and the less guys-shots the better!)

[Link]

jrv wrote

[Link]

I'm as kinky as the next guy, but I draw the line at what "Meatholes" considers fourplay.... :p

(exactly who came up the the concept that stepping on the vagina with dirty ass kicks is anything in the ballpark of erotic???)

[Link]

He is a creation, just like Santa Clause, Jesus Christ, The Easter Bunny, and Pee-Wee Herman.

As with the others, people will look to him for as long as they need him, and when they find independence (or the next thing to pledge eternal allegience to) they will put him away, Just as Pooh was finally put away by Christopher Robin.

[Link]

As for Khan well, i understand he may not want to show himself much but bluring and putting black stripe over his face...lol

As for his work, i saw the Nicki Hunter scene and when shart crying and screaming i was like "ouch...i was kind of shock, stoped to masturbate and lost the bonner..." There rought sex and plain abuse...

[Link]

I worked with Khan Tusion for over a year, especially in the beginning with Meatholes and consider him the most unique and raw pornographers out there. Almost to a tee, every girl was informed what they were going to do and were given code words to stop the action if it became too intense or otherwise. It's interesting to note that alot of the girls came back later and told me the experience was cathartic in a way.

It's none of my business to let anyone out there know who Khan is. I have been asked and refuse to divulge. He is a very private guy with a unique set of skills regarding porn. I frankly would rather watch a scene he directs than a scene directed by 99% of the pornographers out there. I truly wish I had some of his psychological skills during a scene but, alas, I do not.

But I will show you what he looks like ...

http://www.homestead-farm.net/photos/2005-LateJuly/19-guy-eats-corn.jpg

Edited by - Chico Wang on 9/14/2006 4:44:15 AM

[Link]

It is the unfortunate reality that a huge percentage of the women who perform for us were abused and would not be in the sex industry has that not happened. Girls that were abused very typically act out what happened to them again and again.

It is a sad fact, and I haven't let it stop me from watching porn, but perhaps we owe it to them to at least feel guilty sometimes about getting off of them re enacting their traumas.

In my own case, although I know that just about all of the girls were abused, I only really get bothered when it is screamingly obvious in a scene how the girl is re enacting her trauma.

An example of this for me was in RLD's "Breakin' Em In 2" with a girl (I forget which one since I now skip the scene) who said she did not really like vaginal sex and preferred anal. Well, to my mind that just said that when she was abused it was anally. She was there to act it out, but the abuse had turned her against sex generally so she tolerated vaginal sex only so she could go get to the anal which was the reinactment she was there for.

I don't have a good answer about the morality of watching porn once you realize how much of it is the result of trauma. All I can say is that I try to avoid stuff like rough sex films which just seem to add to the trauma.

[Link]

I do. And you're making things up.

How many people in the industry do you know? Furthermore, how many more do you know intimately enough so that they admit their abuse to you?

And as for girls specifically requesting anal? I haven't seen that film, and I'm not aware of the context, but have you ever heard of menstruation? Or anal orgasms? (my foot!)

Your logic lacks... logic...

As for your morality, well....

[Link]

Chico Wang wrote

Learned Hand wrote

[Link]

Additionally I pay attention to the interviews of porn stars where they are often asked about early sexual encounters. All those girls that say they first started having sex at 14 (or earlier)? Those are not happy memories for those girls. I have also heard the reactions of the guys on tape when they hear the ages of first sex for these girls. Sometimes when a girl will say 15 or something like that they will laugh and say "that's late for porn."

I have also seen guys say things like "we aren't doing anything to these girls that their dads or uncles haven't already."

I am not trying to suggest that the guys are jerks for that reaction. They are merely observing the reality. I also think that off the cuff remarks like these from guys who are really around these girls all the time can give a lot of insight into the reality of the situation.

But look, I am not telling you to stop watching porn. I still watch it.

I don't think it is necessary to feel high minded in every single thing I do. I can acknowledge the pull and attraction of porn while still feeling bad for what happened in the early lives of most of the women who are performing for me. If you can't, fine you know, gloss over it.

[Link]

I also try to tune some of the interview out because thinking too much about it puts a damper on the stroking mood.

I used to like these interviews because I am always more excited when I can see more of the real girl behind the fantasy. In fact, I still do like them any time I am not hearing about how the girl first had sex when she was 12. It is just too bad that so often that is what comes up in the interview.

I think the whole "when did you first start having sex" question is mostly a fluke of history. Ed Powers was one of the first to have interviews of the girls in his scenes and it just happened that this was one of the questions that he asked. I think that most of the interviews in porn now are a result of copying this aspect of the Dirty Debs line.

I don't think that the average porn interviewer is trying to probe hurtful memories of the girls, I think it is just a case of interviewing being basically a hard job and the fact that there have come to be a stock set of questions to ask just as a result of repitition.

I don't doubt that Khan on the other hand noticed the same thing we did and decided that he *would* try to probe in a hurtful way. I don't want to tar Vince Voyeur or Randy West with the same brush though.

Speaking of Randy, one of his best questions was "What did you do before you got into porn?" This was a safe question in terms of trauma that often really enhanced the fantasy. Hearing about the girl working in the family sewing machine store is good fodder for the cute cashier fantasy.

[Link]