That's just it. There is no variation with porn. It's either one thing or another. So you choose what you like more because if everybody buys some of the other just for variety, porners think that's the new "thing" and pretty soon, the shaved pussy is completely gone. So if I have to choose, I choose shaved. I don't mind pubes trimmed to reasonable proportion but shaved just looks better. Edited by - randomprecision on 6/18/2008 2:36:59 AM
According to the Evil Angel website, there's a dvd to be released soon called "Rocco's Hairy Bush". How's that for an intriguing title? Edited by - zedzed on 6/18/2008 2:40:15 PM
That's perfect! So long as the "bottom half" is shaved so that the "lady parts" are free and clean, then pubic hair on the pussy mound (I believe it is called; the area above the pubic bone for biology fans) is certainly acceptable, perhaps welcomed, and always up to the woman in question, as far as I am concerned. As mentioned by others above, variety is nice. It shouldn't be BALD or BUSH only, but Kristina put it best, just please keep the lady parts nicely visible. ;) Slurp, Slurp!!!
i have a couple weeks before i am in front of the camera again... and i am growing my hair out so i can go get it waxed and have a little landing strip!!!! and whoever you were saying you dont hire girls with pubs... lame! if she keeps it trimmed up or waxed nicely then its done tastefully right... im not down for full bush ewwwwwwwwwwwwww but having a little hair there is hot! "im the girl your mother warned you about"
Long and Cursive road to the Ivory Pagoda in the province of Loraine 4076 Posts 12/03
Posted - Jun 28 2008 : 5:32PM
From the Image Policy No images displaying the pubic region, including images where the pubic region is shaved, digitally blurred or blocked by means of digital editing.
To answer DP's question, and IMHO, I hope not. I like 'em bald! G
[Link]
Rosco Fuji Deactivated User
On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Feb 16 2009 : 2:32PM
Didn't I hear that some sort of Treaty was signed on this subject in the mid 90's?
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jul 14 2009 : 2:43AM
I agree with everything you wrote, except for the part about the fake tits. Unless they really look bad, I have no problem at all with fake tits. I don't want girls to stop getting fake tits anymore than I want them to stop shaving. I've been noticing a few of the girls in porn, like Kristina Rose, are startting grow out their pubes. To be honest, I don't like it at all. I'm really hoping that this doesn't spread to becoming a trend beyond the small minority of girls who are already doing it. I much prefer the girls to be completely hairless down there. Am I the only one who finds it ironic that while girls in porn are deciding to let their pubes grow, most of the guys in porn are still shaving? Shouldn't it be the other way around? The whole thing is just really backwards.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 14 2009 : 2:50AM
I completely don't understand the statement that 'pubic hair on the young girls looks terrible.' It's actually rather creepy. BTW you can now add Kimberly Kane, Bobbi Star and Kagney Linn Carter to the list of pro-bush girls. Edited by - BlackSix on 7/14/2009 2:51:40 AM
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 14 2009 : 3:22AM
I think you know exactly what I mean but I'll spell it out: why would pubic hair 'on young girls' look terrible? Because you want to imagine they're underage? If not, why specifically 'young girls'? If one is into age-play fine, but to insist that every young woman performer should shave to satisfy that small niche is ridiculous. Edited by - BlackSix on 7/14/2009 3:24:24 AM
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jul 14 2009 : 3:38AM
Can't it just be that guys simply don't like pubic hair on a woman? Why does everything have to overanalyzed into being something something that it isn't? It has nothing to do with imagining anyone as underage. Most guys (yes, I think I can safely speak for the majority of American men when I say this) simply prefer women to be shaved down there, and it has nothing to do with pedophilic fantasies. It's no different than finding high heels, big boobs, and long hair attractive. It just seems to spark an automatic sexual response in most men. Why else would women do it? And just as Jim Gunn pointed out, many young women already shave or wax their pubic hair now by default anyway.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 14 2009 : 3:45AM
But then why did he specifically say 'young women' instead of women? After all, he was talking about videos called Lesbian Teenyboppers, so I don't think it takes too much to conclude what he likes really is age-play, not just shaved pussies, as you claim.
Hazel Heart Interview
Posted - Jun 15 2008 : 6:28PM
