I’m a huge fan of Jules Jordan’s movies, but why has it been so long since any of them have featured anal cream pies? The standard of his productions is only let down for me by the total reliance on the facial climax which we’ve all seen a million times. I find this particularly frustrating because Jules himself always delivers such volcanic loads – how much more exciting to see these delivered into some of those gapes he so expertly opens? And why not do at least one of the Ass Worhip series as a cream pie only or even a new Weapons of Ass Destruction with multiple loads? These things are attempted by other directors with varying degrees of success but surely Jules is the man to really exploit their erotic potential – why is he making us wait?
Not to divert the thread, but the reason is (likely) to be because of the HIV scare from Mar 2004. Creampies are inherintly more dangerous as they can transmit HIV much easier than any other act, and ANAL creampies are significantly MORE dangerous due to almost always getting torn (even at a microscopic level) and having blood to semen contact.
That said, a lot of the companies changed their policies to no longer shoot CP's or only in very limited circumstances (e.g. actors are already a "couple", etc...) Others don't care about the issues and continue shooting.
Anyway, I am a CP fan, but am not an anal fan or anal cp fan at all. From the pov of vaginal cp's I havn't seen them go down much in the last year (a small percentage maybe). I actually have seen anal cp increase due to the market wanting it, which makes it harder for me to find CP without also getting anal :(
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jul 24 2005 : 12:35PM
Jules has always favored facials and I believe Evil Angel actually has a restriction about anal creampies. Personally, I don't favor creampies on video. While it's the most natural thing in a personal pairing it doesn't translate well in video. Cumming shallow is not a natural urge, burying it deep is where it's at. Rummaging around to find the cum and have it spill out does nothing for me, and even less when it gets collected for a degrading aftermath. To me, the only time it's hot is when there's someone to eat it out of the hole. The HIV crisis of last year hasn't slowed down creampies all that much and there are plenty to be seen.
An interesting theory Creamlover but I doubt that it can be anything to do with any particular production company’s policy on the matter. I would imagine that any company that has decided not to make purely safe sex movies will have a safety policy is based on testing rather than the limited and arbitary prohibition of some risky acts- otherwise why would they all not also prohibit the sharing of anal toys, the transfer of dicks from one ass to another (both with the risk of blood to blood contact that’s even more dangerous, in the presence of disease, than the semen to blood contact that you warn of), allowing cum to enter the delicate mucus membranes of noses and eyes and any number of other potentially dangerous practices we regularly see?
I love (vaginal) creampies, in real life and on video.
However, like you, I hate all the time taken at the end to dig, stand, jump, shake, spread, and the usual large degrading that goes with it.
The ideal creampie scenes are those that end up having cum squirt out around/on the guys dick afterwards, or naturally dripping out. No long circus acts afterwards. My SO strongly dislikes facials, and even before her, while I could enjoy them, they wern't as hot as cumming on her breasts or pussy or stomach which is nowhere near as degrading.
Even more ideal: Another female eating her out with it oozing out afterwards. Unfortunately these are almost always coupled with huge bukkake/degrading videos so it's rare to find with it in a better light.
Also enjoy a second round, either with the same guy (RARE) or another guy (not as rare but usually with bad overtones typically), with all the first cum dripping out/sounds during the second round (no cleanup)
I wish studios rather than migrating to a complete "bukkake/anal/anal cp/slapping/facial" ending produced stuff just as hot but nowhere near as degrading. Unfortunately that's not the way the industry is going. :(
Lucky for the many anal creampies fans that there are many studios out there like RDL, PXP, Anabolic/Diabolic and 3rd Degrees etc.. that we can count on for our pleasure and money.
Most of Evil directors are very good, but they and the actors should be the ones that decide on the type of sexual activity they want to engage in before and during the shooting. And Evil should just distribute like they seem fit to do.
I have a high art, I hurt with cruelty those who would damage me. 225 Posts 4/04
Posted - Jul 25 2005 : 11:39AM
What is the policy in the she-males titles at EA- are they condom only? If they are then at least this safety policy is consistant and I can live with it. But if not it seems odd to single out one form of high risk behavior over others that are also high risk.
Quite the reverse thank you juha, your judgement is wholly unfounded.. It is the concept of a less than all embracing and self consistent policy on risk that I find senseless. Either the performers are known (?) to be disease free or they're not - in which case only safe sex makes sense.
If you'll do a search for past threads, spunkster, you'll find this is well trod ground. In a nutshell, there's no such thing as safe sex porn, there are only degrees of risk. You either don't support porn or you decide what constitutes acceptable risk and support those who share your assessment.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Jul 25 2005 : 4:07PM
For several reasons this seems a troll thread. It's closed. I've had enough of the same few trolls coming back. If I'm wrong so be it. I'm willing to take that chance.
Jules Jordan @ AEBN
Posted - Jul 24 2005 : 10:13AM
