Kurt Lockwood

xoxo
Devinn

[Link]

*one more reason I don't give a shit about his personal life and all of that. The boy is hot, takes risks (Str8t Shots... yeah). Good thing

[Link]

Wankus, as offered to his listening audience on KSEXradio.com two years ago, got a wonderful blowjob from Kylie and another woman and during the course of the blow job, allowed Kylie to pour lube on her fingers and slide a few in and out of his rectum for a few moments.

He not only never denied this act, he's the one who brought it to public attention since it wasn't done as a "scene". There was no FISTING going on, there was no strap on action...just some anal finger play that was not only never denied, but volunteered.

So...now that that information has been forthcoming, yet again my little Wankus hater...can you come up with a new and creative way to bash me or are we going to have to all succumb to your typical, childish, grade+school style attempts at promoting Wankus as a horrible person?

It's really funny. I get accused all the time of being too much of a self promoter when in actuality, the majority of the time KSEXradio.com, TylerFaith.com, TeamTyler.net or any other company I'm affiliated with gets mentioned...it's some completely fucking moron like Jamesn who brings me into the fold when I wasn't even part of the topic.

Here's a suggestion dickhead....if you don't like me...stop giving me any attention!

Until then...

...thanks for the press...checks in the mail!

PS: As I said two years ago when I announced the event...if a couple of Kylie Ireland's fingers in my ass while she's sucking me off makes me gay...let me know when the next parade is...I'll bring the rainbow stickers!

[Link]

Why are you reading the Gay DVD sextion Jamesn? I only found it by searching my name. You must have browsed it for...well...you know why.

In fact, psych class 101...those who constantly point negatively at certain sexualities, usually have their own secrets. You are familiar with your hang ups. I don't need to point them out for you.

As for me, I'm ALL FOR anyone being anyone they want to be, so long as they wave the flag of who they truly are.

Back to the topic, if Kurt claims to like it up the ass and isn't defensive about it...I think that's just fantastic and I support his right to enjoy what he enjoys.

It's the people who are defensive, in denial or constantly creating smoke screens about who they are or things they've done in the past that I will always bash.

(And of course, the no-name, annon loser reader who quickly points out everyone in the public eye that he has issues with while not presenting his real self to be judged by the same peers he claims to have such great awareness about. That coward will never get my respect. As much as I think Mr Lockwood has issues, I'll drink a beer with him and pull him out of a burning building way before the Jamesn's of the world. Those characters are on the same level as the typical participant of a Yahoo Chat Room)

Nuff said...off to bed! ;)

[Link]

Those could be the worst 2 posts ever.

[Link]

What a way to kick of your new Shane's World directing career.

Brian

[Link]

Anyway, VT, I respectfully disagree with your assertion that he is taking any risks with his image. This industry and its fans are notoriously ethically challenged. For him to have future problems in straight porn would require consumers to take a stand on some sort of principle (however misguided) and that's not going to happen.

Cases in point:
1. A Performer falsifies HIV tests, knowingly infects other performers, and is still in the production side of the industry.
2. A Performer starred in gay porn flicks. Performer vehemently denied such, even in the face of video evidence. Eventually just stopped responding to inquiries, which surprisingly, quit coming as well. Said performer is still active and idolized in straight porn. Rumors persist indicating performer is straight for pay.
3. A Director is shown to be a convicted sex-offender. Details of the exact charges get obfuscated such that it is difficult to know exactly what happened, except that the record remains. The dates of the offenses rule out youthful indiscretion. This person is still active in the pornography industry, has numerous fans who go so far as to gush support in his battle over adversity.
4. No need to start this discussion back up- but the facts are clear that "anal creampies" constitute one of the riskiest forms of sexual behavior. The risks inherent in "ass-to-mouth" and "a-t-o-g-m" are pretty well document, too. That doesn't stop consumers from demanding it, producers delivering it, or for that matter, performers from engaging in those behaviors.

So anyway, disregard what I think about Lockwood having his ass fucked, or Wankus having his ass three-fingered, I'm not addressing that at all. I'm simply saying that Lockwood doing this represents absolutely NO risk whatsoever to whatever image he has cultivated.

[Link]

Sorry, that's almost as bad as Taylor Rain mangling song titles, but, hey, I haven't had any coffee yet.

Male hysteria is hilarious. I've enjoyed this thread.

[Link]

I do, however, agree with skronker that this is a silly and overblown thread - but hurrah for silly and overblown threads I say!

(Strange that such an obvious troll as lovetoomuch has, despite himself, managed to start quite a number of threads that have taken amusing and interesting turns.)

Final thought for the day: if you can't be happy getting pleasure from your prostate then you are really only half a man.

[Link]

xoxo
Devinn

[Link]

Enjoy.

Scott McGowan - EyeOnAdult.com

[Link]

xoxo,
Devinn

[Link]

I, of course, know full and well that calling for a media blackout and having it come to fruition is indeed impossible. We all know that in porn there is no such thing as a blacklist.

Just ask Rob Black or John T. Bone

It was really more rhetorical than anything. Calling for the blackout was just a mechinism to point out that most folks who write news and gossip sites about the industry will continue to allow themselves to be had by this guy. I won't name names, but a lot of people that do what I do would stick their tongues in a paper shredder if they thought it'd get them a few extra clicks.

Plus I was also sensationlizing things a bit.

Shame on me, huh? ;)

Now for the record, I'm not trying to come off as some crusader. I'm far from it. I just feel a little bit better about things if I'm not the guy putting money into the pockets of people I suspect do more harm than good.

Taking this stand also makes me feel less like the proverbial played fiddle.

Respectfully,

Scott McGowan - EyeOnAdult.com

Edited by - smcg on 2/1/2006 11:40:16 PM

Edited by - smcg on 2/1/2006 11:41:15 PM

[Link]